Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Kamal @ Poorikamal v. State of Tamil Nadu

16 Oct 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants who stabbed the deceased causing fatal injury to vital arteries, rejecting their plea of private defence and delay in FIR as insufficient to create reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC private defence carotid artery injury

Rajvinder Singh v. State of Haryana

16 Oct 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for kidnapping and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, rejecting belated additional evidence and affirming the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence kidnapping murder forgery

C. Chakkaravarthy v. M. Satyavathy

16 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that promotion to Assistant Engineer posts must be based on merit with eligibility determined by length of service, not date of degree acquisition, and directed the Government of Pondicherry to redo the promotion exercise accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant promotion selection post merit-based promotion seniority

Sant Ram v. Dhan Kaur & Ors.

16 Oct 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court clarified that the petitioner’s right to recover mesne profits already awarded by lower courts was not given up in the 2009 order and directed execution of the decree accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits execution of decree clarification of order Order XVIII Rule 5

Jayendra Awad v. Nivedita Sharma

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the civil appeal for fresh adjudication in accordance with its prior judgment in Prakash & Ors. vs. Phulavati & Ors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant remand High Court Supreme Court precedent civil appeal

M. Narayana & Anr. v. Ramakka by Lrs. and Ors.

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's impugned order and remanded the civil appeals for fresh adjudication in light of its recent binding judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant remand impugned order High Court Supreme Court judgment

H.P. Chikkarama Reddy v. Kanthamma

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, set aside the High Court's impugned order, and remanded the case for fresh consideration in light of its prior judgment in Prakash & Ors. vs. Phulavati & Ors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil appeal remand impugned order Supreme Court precedent

Ratheesh v. State of Kerala & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against conviction for rape and cheating, upholding concurrent findings of fact and declining to interfere with the sentence reduced by the High Court.

criminal appeal_dismissed rape Section 376 IPC Section 417 IPC concurrent findings

B.S. Sheshagiri Setty v. State of Karnataka

15 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's suo motu revision under Section 108 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act to set aside an illegal auction sale was valid despite delay, protecting appellants' right to livelihood and setting aside the High Court's dismissal on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 108 Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act Revision petition limitation Auction sale confirmation Right to livelihood Article 21

Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. Muktinath Airlines Private Limited & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that disputes arising from an arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration, and objections regarding contract validity or forgery are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration agreement

Khumbha Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

15 Oct 2015 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic refusal of leave to appeal in a dowry death case, emphasizing the need for reasons and proper application of statutory presumptions, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 113B Evidence Act leave to appeal Section 378 CrPC

Ram Sunder Sen v. Narender @ Bode Singh Patel

15 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder and rape case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances motive alibi

Krishika Lulla & Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that copyright does not subsist in the title of a literary or cinematographic work, and quashed a criminal complaint alleging infringement of copyright in the film title "Desi Boys."

criminal appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement title of work Copyright Act, 1957 Section 63 Copyright Act

M/s. Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S.A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that legal expenses incurred to protect a going concern are deductible under Section 37 and intellectual property rights acquired constitute 'plant' eligible for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income-Tax Act, 1961 Section 37 deduction Intellectual property rights Trademarks depreciation

Sumer Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Narendra Gorani

15 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that disputes involving possession of immovable property situated outside Bombay fall outside the Bombay High Court's original jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, dismissing the appellant's appeal against revocation of leave to file a Section 9 arbitration petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Clause 12 Letters Patent Section 9 Arbitration Act suit for land territorial jurisdiction

Ratnesh Kumar Choudhary v. Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar

15 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that termination of a probationer based on an ex parte enquiry report containing stigmatic allegations without a regular enquiry violates natural justice and is punitive, thus quashing the termination and ordering reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant probationer termination natural justice stigmatic termination illegal appointment

K.A. Kotrappa Reddy v. Rayara Manjunatha Reddy

15 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to delay in FIR, doubtful witness credibility, lack of motive, and procedural lapses, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in FIR injured witnesses motive in criminal law partisan witnesses

Faruk Ilahi Tamboli v. B.S. Shankarrao Kokate

14 Oct 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal for eviction on bona fide need grounds, holding that the landlord's genuine business requirement and comparative hardship justified eviction despite tenant's alternative accommodations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona fide need eviction landlord-tenant dispute standard rent

N. Sunkanna v. State of Andhra Pradesh

14 Oct 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C.Nagappan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a corruption case holding that mere possession of tainted currency without proof of demand of illegal gratification is insufficient for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence Section 13(1)(d) offence illegal gratification

Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors.

14 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the Bihar Public Service Commission's use of moderation over scaling in evaluating multi-subject competitive examinations, clarifying that Sanjay Singh does not mandate scaling and limiting judicial interference in expert evaluation decisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant moderation method scaling method public service commission competitive examination