Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpn v. Alexix Sonier

08 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the liability of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation for a motor accident, disallowed certain foreign medical expenses due to lack of proof, and awarded additional compensation for attendant costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence contributory negligence special damages

Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Anr. v. Buddha Jagadheeswararao & Ors.

08 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that unregistered documents evidencing relinquishment of rights in immovable property are inadmissible for proving partition but may be admitted for collateral purposes upon payment of stamp duty and penalty.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Section 17 Section 49 partition suit

Avenue Supermarts Pvt. Ltd v. Nischint Bhalla & Ors

08 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that vested rights under a decree cannot be nullified by withdrawal of a motion at the appellate stage and directed the High Court to decide the appeal on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant withdrawal of suit vested rights order confirming sale Notice of Motion

State of Jammu & Kashmir v. R.K. Zalpuri

08 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an unexplained delay of over five years in challenging a dismissal order bars relief under Article 226, emphasizing the importance of delay and laches in writ jurisdiction and limiting the power of review to correcting palpable errors.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches writ petition Article 226 disciplinary proceedings

Ram Bahal v. Deputy Director of Consolidation

08 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the Deputy Director of Consolidation's order dismissing the appellants' claim of adverse possession over disputed land, affirming the validity of revenue entries favoring the respondents and dismissing the appeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act adverse possession revisional jurisdiction

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/s. Ispat Industries Ltd.

07 Oct 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that freight charges for transportation to the buyer's premises are not includible in excise duty valuation when sales are ex-works and ownership passes at the factory gate, overruling revenue's claim based solely on transit insurance.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 place of removal excise duty valuation transit insurance

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-IV v. M/S. Fitrite Packers, Mumbai

07 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that printing on duty-paid GI paper amounts to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, as it transforms the paper into a distinct product with a specific commercial use.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 2(f) printing

State of Haryana v. Northern Indian Glass Industries Ltd.

07 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to resume land acquired for industrial use without mandatory prior hearing where the Respondent breached contractual terms by unauthorized sale, emphasizing pragmatic application of natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deed of Conveyance Resumption of land Principles of natural justice

State of Karnataka v. F. Nataraj

07 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to lack of reliable evidence proving sexual intercourse beyond reasonable doubt despite the prosecutrix being a minor.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minor consent medical evidence

M/S STAR INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS), RAIGAD

07 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that roasting ores into concentrates amounts to manufacture, excluding concentrates from exemption notifications for ores, and upheld countervailing duty on imported Roasted Molybdenum Ore Concentrate.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant countervailing duty exemption notification manufacture ores and concentrates

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ravinder Kumar

07 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant-Corporation's bonafide cancellation of a tender to ensure reasonable rates and transparency, setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender cancellation public procurement Article 14 arbitrariness

D. Thamodaran v. Kandasamy & Anr.

07 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to inconsistencies, delay in FIR, and failure to prove recovery of the weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304 Part II IPC FIR delay recovery of weapon interested witnesses

Daya Sah v. Chandra Datt Pandey

07 Oct 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals upholding the lower courts' concurrent findings that the appellants failed to prove ownership and tenancy over the suit property, thereby denying reliefs for demolition and ejectment.

civil appeal_dismissed concurrent findings ownership tenancy encroachment

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (SEA), CHENNAI v. M/S. NATIONAL LAMINATION INDUSTRIES & ANR.

07 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the Customs Department's rejection of undervalued declared import prices and restored the differential duty demand, emphasizing the necessity of documentary evidence to justify valuation differences under Customs Valuation Rules.

customs appeal_allowed Significant Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 undervaluation transaction value Rule 8 Customs Valuation

Rajni Kant Ojha v. State of Bihar

07 Oct 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that seniority of employees transferred between different departments on a policy basis must be determined from their date of joining the new post, not from their original merit or appointment date.

civil appeal_allowed Significant seniority direct recruitment transfer common selection process

Vijay Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India

06 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a government servant who fails to join duty after suspension revocation is not entitled to salary for the period of non-joining, affirming the principle of 'no work no pay' despite procedural irregularities in suspension revocation.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant suspension revocation pay and allowances during suspension no work no pay government servant salary entitlement

State through Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mushtaq Ahmad

06 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act for possession of commercial quantity of charas, ruling that mandatory minimum sentences cannot be reduced based on purity or time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act commercial quantity charas Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)

Dinesh Lal v. State of Uttarakhand

06 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court remanded a murder conviction case for fresh appellate consideration due to inadequate re-appraisal of evidence and reliance on interested witnesses without proper scrutiny.

criminal other Significant Section 302 IPC Section 4/25 Arms Act interested witnesses re-appraisal of evidence

Jagdish Lal Gambhir v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

06 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of an employee post-bank amalgamation, affirming that disciplinary proceedings by the transferee bank under its service rules are valid despite prior inquiries and procedural contentions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet transfer of employees

Satya Pal Singh v. State of M.P.

06 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that victims have a statutory right to appeal acquittal orders under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. only after obtaining leave under Section 378(3), and remanded the case for proper exercise of appellate jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. leave to appeal Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. victim's right to appeal