Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

PREM v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

02 Nov 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim to Rs. 6 lakhs due to inadequacy of the original amount and absence of objection from the insurance company.

civil appeal_allowed Motor Accident Compensation Compensation Enhancement Insurance Company Motor Accident Compensation Tribunal

GURCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

02 Nov 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

The Supreme Court reduced the sentence of an aged appellant suffering from ailments to one year on compassionate grounds while disposing of the criminal appeal.

criminal sentence_modified sentence reduction age of accused health ailments compassionate grounds

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rinku Singh

02 Nov 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court enhanced the sentence from the High Court's reduced term to three years imprisonment for firearm injuries, emphasizing appropriate sentencing reflecting the offence's gravity.

criminal appeal_allowed sentence enhancement firearm injuries High Court sentence reduction criminal appeal

Dr. I. Ismail v. K. Shameem Rani

30 Oct 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a removal order against a college principal after a proper inquiry, dismissed the appeal for delay and on merits, and reaffirmed the applicability of Vishaka guidelines and res judicata in service matters.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant removal order sexual harassment Vishaka guidelines inquiry procedure

U. P. Power Corporation Limited v. Vimla Devi

30 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by limiting energy charge revision to twelve months based on average subsequent consumption and set aside adverse remarks and costs imposed on officers for procedural irregularities without malafide.

civil appeal_allowed Significant energy charges meter fault short assessment revision of bills

MOHAMMED YASSIN v. RAMIZABI

29 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that possession initially permissive does not become adverse by mere passage of time post final decree without evidence of hostility, restoring decrees in favor of the appellant for declaration of title and possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession permissive possession title lease vs license

Poonam v. State of U.P. & Ors.

29 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent allottee without independent rights is not a necessary party entitled to challenge an appellate order restoring the original allottee's rights, affirming the principle of necessary party impleadment and natural justice in writ proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant necessary party natural justice writ petition fair price shop

Shri Kamal Prashar v. Airport Authority and Another

28 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that statutory deputation under the National Airport Authority Act is mandatory and an employee cannot revert to the parent department without formal relief, validating disciplinary action for unauthorized absence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory deputation National Airport Authority Act, 1985 Section 13(3) unauthorized absence

M/s. Chebrolu Enterprises v. Andhra Pradesh Backward Class Cooperative Finance Corporation Ltd.

28 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld an Arbitral Award fixing a lower price for supplied goods based on suppliers' undertaking that quoted prices were the lowest, dismissing appeals challenging the Tribunal's jurisdiction and findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award price determination undertaking Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Union of India v. Manoj Deswal

28 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful discharge of a non-attested trainee soldier without prior show cause notice, affirming the Commanding Officer's authority under Army Rules to terminate probationary service for unauthorized absence and desertion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Army Rules 1954 discharge of non-attested soldier principles of natural justice summary enquiry

GMR ENERGY LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE

27 Oct 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the invoice values declared under a rotable exchange programme represent the true value for customs duty, disallowed additional valuation based on returned parts, and upheld exemption benefits under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus.

customs appeal_allowed Significant Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 Long Term Assured Parts Supply Agreement Rotable Exchange Programme Transaction value

Director General of Foreign Trade and Another v. M/s. Kanak Exports and Another

27 Oct 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's retrospective amendments to the EXIM Policy 2002-2007 excluding certain exports from duty free entitlement benefits, affirming the statutory power to amend trade policy in public interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant EXIM Policy 2002-2007 Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 Section 5 amendment power Duty Free Credit Entitlement Scheme

M/S. MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

27 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that imported wax used in manufacturing cotton yarn constitutes raw material, disqualifying the appellant from excise duty exemption under Notification No.8/97-C.E.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Export Oriented Undertaking Notification No.8/97-C.E. raw material consumable

Ashok Rangnth Nagar v. Shrikant Govindrao Sangvikar

27 Oct 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must formulate a substantial question of law before entertaining or deciding a second appeal under Section 100 CPC and remitted the matter for fresh disposal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC second appeal substantial question of law High Court jurisdiction

Mehboob Ali & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan

27 Oct 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for fake currency offences, holding that statements leading to discovery of facts under section 27 of the Evidence Act are admissible even if recorded during police custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 27 Evidence Act Confession admissibility Fake currency Discovery of fact

Dr. Sandeep v. Union of India

27 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld domicile-based reservation in super-specialty medical admissions under Article 371-D and the Presidential Order, ruling it constitutionally valid despite general merit-based admission principles.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 371-D Presidential Order 1974 domicile-based reservation super-specialty medical courses

Kamlesh v. Attar Singh

27 Oct 2015 · H. L. Dattu; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in motor accident cases involving composite negligence, all drivers are jointly and severally liable, allowing claimants to recover full compensation from any one of them.

civil appeal_allowed Significant composite negligence joint tort-feasors motor accident claim compensation

Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

27 Oct 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that under a lease agreement, the registered owner, insurer, and lessee (KSRTC) are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation for motor vehicle accidents, and the lessee can recover amounts paid from the owner or insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 lease agreement owner liability insurance indemnity

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai v. M/s. Nebulae Health Care Ltd.

27 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that SSI Units availing CENVAT credit on inputs for third-party branded goods on job work basis are not disentitled from claiming excise duty exemption on their own branded goods under relevant Notifications.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant SSI exemption Central Excise MODVAT credit CENVAT credit

Rajendra Prakash Agrawal v. Union of India & Anr

26 Oct 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court granted bail to an elderly accused in a corruption case after investigation completion and charge sheet filing, emphasizing humanitarian grounds and cooperation despite serious charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Corruption Act Indian Penal Code charge sheet