Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

A.P. Power Coordination Committee v. M/s. Lanco Kondapalli Power Ltd.

16 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings before the Electricity Regulatory Commission under the Electricity Act, 2003, but claims barred by limitation cannot be entertained unless expressly permitted by statute, remanding the dispute for fresh adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act applicability Electricity Regulatory Commission Section 86(1)(f) Electricity Act Capacity charges dispute

Veerendra Kumar Dubey v. Chief of Army Staff

16 Oct 2015 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that discharge under Army Rule 13 requires adherence to prescribed procedural safeguards including an impartial enquiry and consideration of mitigating factors, setting aside the appellant's discharge for failure to follow such procedure.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Army Rules 1954 Rule 13 discharge red ink entries procedural fairness

Pratap Kishore Panda v. Agni Charan Das

16 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of regularizing reserved category appointments made through an alternative recruitment method when OPSC failed to fill reserved vacancies, affirming the State's power to relax recruitment rules within constitutional and statutory limits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularization reservation seniority Orissa Ministerial Service Rules

Balu @ Bala Subramaniam v. State (U.T. of Pondicherry)

16 Oct 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that the appellants could not be convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC due to lack of common intention, modifying their conviction to a lesser offence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention constructive liability murder

Prakash v. Phulavati

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not confer coparcenary rights retrospectively to daughters whose fathers died before the amendment's commencement.

property appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 retrospective effect coparcenary rights

SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN v. MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA

16 Oct 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that upon termination of a named arbitrator's mandate, a substitute arbitrator must be appointed according to the original appointment rules unless expressly excluded, upholding the High Court's appointment of a substitute arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 15(2) Arbitration and Conciliation Act substitute arbitrator arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator

State of Gujarat v. M/S Kothari and Associates

16 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that claims for damages arising from successive breaches of contract must be filed within three years of each breach, and a suit filed beyond this period is barred by limitation even if the plea was not earlier raised.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 successive breaches works contract damages for delay

Kamal @ Poorikamal v. State of Tamil Nadu

16 Oct 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants who stabbed the deceased causing fatal injury to vital arteries, rejecting their plea of private defence and delay in FIR as insufficient to create reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC private defence carotid artery injury

Rajvinder Singh v. State of Haryana

16 Oct 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for kidnapping and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, rejecting belated additional evidence and affirming the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence kidnapping murder forgery

C. Chakkaravarthy v. M. Satyavathy

16 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that promotion to Assistant Engineer posts must be based on merit with eligibility determined by length of service, not date of degree acquisition, and directed the Government of Pondicherry to redo the promotion exercise accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant promotion selection post merit-based promotion seniority

Sant Ram v. Dhan Kaur & Ors.

16 Oct 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court clarified that the petitioner’s right to recover mesne profits already awarded by lower courts was not given up in the 2009 order and directed execution of the decree accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits execution of decree clarification of order Order XVIII Rule 5

Jayendra Awad v. Nivedita Sharma

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the civil appeal for fresh adjudication in accordance with its prior judgment in Prakash & Ors. vs. Phulavati & Ors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant remand High Court Supreme Court precedent civil appeal

M. Narayana & Anr. v. Ramakka by Lrs. and Ors.

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's impugned order and remanded the civil appeals for fresh adjudication in light of its recent binding judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant remand impugned order High Court Supreme Court judgment

H.P. Chikkarama Reddy v. Kanthamma

16 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, set aside the High Court's impugned order, and remanded the case for fresh consideration in light of its prior judgment in Prakash & Ors. vs. Phulavati & Ors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil appeal remand impugned order Supreme Court precedent

Ratheesh v. State of Kerala & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against conviction for rape and cheating, upholding concurrent findings of fact and declining to interfere with the sentence reduced by the High Court.

criminal appeal_dismissed rape Section 376 IPC Section 417 IPC concurrent findings

B.S. Sheshagiri Setty v. State of Karnataka

15 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's suo motu revision under Section 108 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act to set aside an illegal auction sale was valid despite delay, protecting appellants' right to livelihood and setting aside the High Court's dismissal on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 108 Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act Revision petition limitation Auction sale confirmation Right to livelihood Article 21

Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. Muktinath Airlines Private Limited & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that disputes arising from an arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration, and objections regarding contract validity or forgery are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration agreement

Khumbha Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

15 Oct 2015 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic refusal of leave to appeal in a dowry death case, emphasizing the need for reasons and proper application of statutory presumptions, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 113B Evidence Act leave to appeal Section 378 CrPC

Ram Sunder Sen v. Narender @ Bode Singh Patel

15 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder and rape case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances motive alibi

Krishika Lulla & Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta & Anr.

15 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that copyright does not subsist in the title of a literary or cinematographic work, and quashed a criminal complaint alleging infringement of copyright in the film title "Desi Boys."

criminal appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement title of work Copyright Act, 1957 Section 63 Copyright Act