Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

State of Haryana v. Northern Indian Glass Industries Ltd.

07 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to resume land acquired for industrial use without mandatory prior hearing where the Respondent breached contractual terms by unauthorized sale, emphasizing pragmatic application of natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deed of Conveyance Resumption of land Principles of natural justice

State of Karnataka v. F. Nataraj

07 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to lack of reliable evidence proving sexual intercourse beyond reasonable doubt despite the prosecutrix being a minor.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minor consent medical evidence

M/S STAR INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS), RAIGAD

07 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that roasting ores into concentrates amounts to manufacture, excluding concentrates from exemption notifications for ores, and upheld countervailing duty on imported Roasted Molybdenum Ore Concentrate.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant countervailing duty exemption notification manufacture ores and concentrates

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ravinder Kumar

07 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant-Corporation's bonafide cancellation of a tender to ensure reasonable rates and transparency, setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender cancellation public procurement Article 14 arbitrariness

D. Thamodaran v. Kandasamy & Anr.

07 Oct 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to inconsistencies, delay in FIR, and failure to prove recovery of the weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304 Part II IPC FIR delay recovery of weapon interested witnesses

Daya Sah v. Chandra Datt Pandey

07 Oct 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals upholding the lower courts' concurrent findings that the appellants failed to prove ownership and tenancy over the suit property, thereby denying reliefs for demolition and ejectment.

civil appeal_dismissed concurrent findings ownership tenancy encroachment

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (SEA), CHENNAI v. M/S. NATIONAL LAMINATION INDUSTRIES & ANR.

07 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the Customs Department's rejection of undervalued declared import prices and restored the differential duty demand, emphasizing the necessity of documentary evidence to justify valuation differences under Customs Valuation Rules.

customs appeal_allowed Significant Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 undervaluation transaction value Rule 8 Customs Valuation

Rajni Kant Ojha v. State of Bihar

07 Oct 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that seniority of employees transferred between different departments on a policy basis must be determined from their date of joining the new post, not from their original merit or appointment date.

civil appeal_allowed Significant seniority direct recruitment transfer common selection process

Vijay Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India

06 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a government servant who fails to join duty after suspension revocation is not entitled to salary for the period of non-joining, affirming the principle of 'no work no pay' despite procedural irregularities in suspension revocation.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant suspension revocation pay and allowances during suspension no work no pay government servant salary entitlement

State through Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mushtaq Ahmad

06 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act for possession of commercial quantity of charas, ruling that mandatory minimum sentences cannot be reduced based on purity or time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act commercial quantity charas Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)

Dinesh Lal v. State of Uttarakhand

06 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court remanded a murder conviction case for fresh appellate consideration due to inadequate re-appraisal of evidence and reliance on interested witnesses without proper scrutiny.

criminal other Significant Section 302 IPC Section 4/25 Arms Act interested witnesses re-appraisal of evidence

Jagdish Lal Gambhir v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

06 Oct 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of an employee post-bank amalgamation, affirming that disciplinary proceedings by the transferee bank under its service rules are valid despite prior inquiries and procedural contentions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet transfer of employees

Satya Pal Singh v. State of M.P.

06 Oct 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that victims have a statutory right to appeal acquittal orders under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. only after obtaining leave under Section 378(3), and remanded the case for proper exercise of appellate jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. leave to appeal Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. victim's right to appeal

Mahaboosa Begum & Ors v. Tamil Nadu Wakf Board & Anr

06 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order that prematurely objected to evidence production and set aside the sale, and directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.

civil appeal_allowed examination of witnesses production of documents trial court High Court

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. & ANOTHER v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

06 Oct 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that Ready Mix Concrete manufactured and used at the site of construction is not exempt from excise duty under Notification No. 4/1997-CE, which exempts only Concrete Mix, distinguishing the two products based on manufacturing process and quality standards.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Ready Mix Concrete Concrete Mix Central Excise Duty Notification No. 4/1997-CE

Purnima Manthena and Another v. Dr. Renuka Datla & Others

06 Oct 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act lies only on a question of law and set aside the High Court's interim order substituting the Board of Directors, directing the Company Law Board and civil court to decide the dispute on merits.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 10F Companies Act Company Law Board interlocutory order appeal maintainability

Ramesh Chand v. Asruddin

06 Oct 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court set aside the decree of specific performance subject to payment of compensation with enhanced interest, emphasizing the discretionary nature of specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Section 20 Specific Relief Act discretionary remedy agreement for sale

Neon Laboratories Ltd. v. Medical Technologies Ltd.

05 Oct 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld an injunction protecting prior user rights over a trademark despite an earlier registration application by the defendant who delayed actual use.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark prior user rights passing off interlocutory injunction

Khushbir Singh v. Gurdeep Singh

05 Oct 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed amendment of the plaint to change the party's name from father to grandfather and permitted evidence on the amended suit, setting aside the impugned judgment.

civil appeal_allowed amendment of plaint change of party name civil appeal leave to amend

State Bank of Hyderabad v. Rabo Bank

01 Oct 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that a defendant raising triable issues including fraud and lack of acceptance on Bills of Exchange is entitled to unconditional leave to defend a Summary Suit under Order 37 CPC, setting aside summary decrees against the appellant Bank.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Summary Suit Order 37 CPC leave to defend Bills of Exchange