Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh v. State Government of Uttar Pradesh

17 Nov 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that illegal vigilance proceedings and arrest of a public servant without following prescribed procedures violate fundamental rights and awarded compensation for the resulting mental agony and financial loss.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant vigilance enquiry prior approval State Vigilance Committee illegal detention

B. Radhakrishnan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

17 Nov 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that excess pay received by police personnel under a court order cannot be recovered by the government if received without fault, even if the order is later set aside.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay parity Fundamental Rule 22B excess payment recovery police service pay

Pawan Kumar Agarwala v. General Manager-II & Appointing Auth.

17 Nov 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that failure to furnish list of witnesses and documents vitiates disciplinary enquiry, reinstated the appellant with full back wages minus pension, and set aside the lesser penalty imposed by the High Court Division Bench.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice back wages reinstatement

Vishwanath Dadu Gurav v. Dattatray Ganapati Gurav

16 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court remanded the probate dispute for fresh appellate consideration, emphasizing proper evidence appraisal and adequate reasoning by the appellate court.

civil remanded Significant probate Indian Succession Act Section 276 Will validity

M/s Cochin Shipyard Ltd v. M/s Apeejay Shipping Ltd

06 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, legal misconduct must be established from the arbitral record and fresh oral evidence in court to prove such misconduct is impermissible.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 30 legal misconduct arbitral award

VNS College of Physical Education and Management Studies v. State of Madhya Pradesh

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the State's restriction of admissions to candidates who appeared in the Vyapam entrance exam and dismissed the plea of private colleges to conduct college-level counseling for vacant seats.

administrative appeal_dismissed college-level counseling admission rules 2008 Vyapam entrance examination private educational institutions

Jupudy Pardha Sarathy v. Pentapati Rama Krishna

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a Hindu widow's limited life interest in property granted by Will is enlarged into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, extinguishing any vested remainder interests.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14(1) life estate Hindu widow

Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani v. State of Maharashtra

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the State Government has concurrent and superior revisional jurisdiction under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, permitting a second revision, and upheld the Minister's order restoring mutation entries in favor of respondents.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 257 revision jurisdiction State Government revisional power

Parvaiz Ahmad Parry v. State of Jammu & Kashmir

06 Nov 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a candidate with B.Sc. Forestry as a major subject and M.Sc. Forestry satisfies the prescribed qualification for Range Officer Grade-I post and allowed his appeal against rejection on eligibility grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eligibility qualification B.Sc. Forestry M.Sc. Forestry Jammu & Kashmir Forest Service Recruitment Rules

All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association v. State of Kerala

05 Nov 2015 · H.L. Dattu; R.K. Agrawal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld Kerala's selective prohibition of online lotteries under Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998, affirming the State's competence to regulate online lotteries as a distinct class to protect public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 Section 5 online lottery paper lottery

HERO CYCLES (P) LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)

05 Nov 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that interest on borrowed funds used for advancing money to a subsidiary pursuant to commercial expediency is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, allowing the assessee's claim and setting aside the High Court's disallowance.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 36(1)(iii) Income Tax Act interest deduction commercial expediency borrowed funds

Baldev Singh v. State of Haryana

04 Nov 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 15 NDPS Act based on trustworthy police testimony despite non-examination of investigating officer, reducing sentence from twelve to ten years.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 15 NDPS Section 35 NDPS possession of contraband

VSE Stock Services Ltd. v. S.E.B.I & Anr.

04 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that voluntary amalgamation of stock broker companies does not attract SEBI's fee continuity benefit, requiring fresh registration fees to be paid.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant fee continuity benefit SEBI Regulations 1992 amalgamation compulsion of law

State of Rajasthan v. Daud Khan

04 Nov 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S.A. Bobde
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Daud Khan for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, rejecting challenges based on FIR delay, inconclusive forensic evidence, and eyewitness reliability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC FIR delay Section 157 CrPC

UNITECH LTD. & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

04 Nov 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that a collaboration agreement enabling enjoyment of immovable property rights constitutes a 'transfer' under the Income Tax Act, but compulsory pre-emptive purchase orders require proper valuation and an opportunity to rebut tax evasion presumption.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UA Section 269UD compulsory pre-emptive purchase

State of Tamil Nadu v. R. Muthukumaraswamy

03 Nov 2015 · Anil R. Dave; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court allowed transfer petitions under Article 139-A(1) of the Constitution, transferring multiple writ petitions from the High Court of Madras to itself for adjudication.

constitutional appeal_allowed Article 139-A(1) Constitution of India transfer petition writ petition High Court of Madras

Securities & Exchange Board of India v. M/s. Prebon Yamane (I) Ltd.

03 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that fee continuity under SEBI Regulations is limited to specific conversions and denied such benefit to a joint venture entity, allowing SEBI's appeal to recover membership fees.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fee continuity SEBI Regulations 1992 stock broker registration fees segmental surrender

S.E.B.I. v. Alliance Finstock Ltd.

03 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the fee continuity benefit under SEBI Regulations for stock brokers who corporatised before 1 April 1997, ruling that the provision applies retrospectively and SEBI cannot collect fees again for periods already paid.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant fee continuity SEBI Regulations retrospective effect stock brokers

HARI NARAYAN BANSAL v. DADA DEV MANDIR PRABANDHAK SABHA

03 Nov 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; S.A. BOBDE

The Supreme Court held that framing a substantial question of law is not required when dismissing a second appeal at the admission stage and dismissed the appeal while granting the appellants time to vacate the premises subject to payment of mesne profits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant second appeal substantial question of law admission stage tenancy

Union of India v. Jivanti Devi

02 Nov 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed a lump sum payment to the respondent in lieu of family pension, recognizing equitable relief where formal pension eligibility was not met.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family pension Central Reserve Police Force service term lump sum compensation