Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Securities & Exchange Board of India v. ICAP India Pvt. Ltd.

24 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that 'annual turnover' for SEBI registration fees includes the full value of securities transactions, not just brokerage, overruling the SAT's narrower interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant annual turnover SEBI Regulations stock broker registration fee wholesale debt market

M/S INDIAN INSTT. OF PLANNING & MGMT. & ANR. v. M/S AK & I ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.

24 Nov 2015 · J. S. KHEHAR; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court held that a party must first request the other party to agree on an arbitrator before approaching the court under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, and set aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator for lack of such request.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement

M/S BRIDGESTONE INDIA PVT. LTD v. INDERPAL SINGH

24 Nov 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that after the 2015 amendment, courts where the cheque is presented for collection have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overruling earlier jurisdictional rulings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction dishonour of cheque Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance 2015

Commercial Taxes Officer v. A Infrastructure Ltd.

24 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that exemption granted to manufacturers under Rajasthan VAT Act does not render goods exempted goods, entitling the manufacturer to Input Tax Credit on raw materials.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Exempted Goods Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Section 8 exemption

K.S. Soundararajan v. Commissioner of H.R. & C.E.

24 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld that the charities under the Will constitute public religious trusts and that authorities have power under Section 64 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, 1959, to frame a scheme for their administration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant public trust private trust religious charity Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, 1959

Elektron Lighting Systems Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Shah Investments Financial Developments and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

20 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the contract for LED street light replacement awarded to the appellants but quashed the grant of exclusive advertising rights for lack of fair tender process, emphasizing judicial restraint in contract award disputes.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review tender process technical bid price bid

Krishna Bhatacharjee v. Sarathi Choudhury

20 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that judicial separation does not sever the domestic relationship under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and a woman can claim recovery of Stridhan as a continuing offence not barred by limitation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 judicial separation aggrieved person domestic relationship

State of Rajasthan v. Ramesh

20 Nov 2015 · S. A. Bobde; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's acquittal and convicted the accused for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under grave and sudden provocation, based on medical and circumstantial evidence ruling out suicide by hanging.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC strangulation hanging

Raj Singh @ Raja v. State of Haryana

20 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court acquitted Raj Singh @ Raja of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC due to lack of common object but upheld his convictions for rioting and assault under Sections 148, 307, and 323 read with Section 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC murder

Brij Bihari Singh v. Bihar State Financial Corporation

20 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of an employee due to procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice in departmental enquiry and improper delegation of disciplinary authority, remanding the matter for fresh enquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice disciplinary proceedings right of appeal

Prof. N.K. Ganguly v. CBI New Delhi

19 Nov 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory before prosecuting public servants for offences committed in discharge of official duty, quashing proceedings initiated without such sanction in a case of alleged illegal land transfer.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC prior sanction criminal conspiracy public servant

STATE BANK OF PATIALA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

18 Nov 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation received by banks on delayed payment of discounted bills of exchange is not taxable as interest under the Interest Tax Act, 1974.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Interest Tax Act, 1974 Section 2(7) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 32

Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh v. State Government of Uttar Pradesh

17 Nov 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that illegal vigilance proceedings and arrest of a public servant without following prescribed procedures violate fundamental rights and awarded compensation for the resulting mental agony and financial loss.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant vigilance enquiry prior approval State Vigilance Committee illegal detention

B. Radhakrishnan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

17 Nov 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that excess pay received by police personnel under a court order cannot be recovered by the government if received without fault, even if the order is later set aside.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay parity Fundamental Rule 22B excess payment recovery police service pay

Pawan Kumar Agarwala v. General Manager-II & Appointing Auth.

17 Nov 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that failure to furnish list of witnesses and documents vitiates disciplinary enquiry, reinstated the appellant with full back wages minus pension, and set aside the lesser penalty imposed by the High Court Division Bench.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice back wages reinstatement

Vishwanath Dadu Gurav v. Dattatray Ganapati Gurav

16 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court remanded the probate dispute for fresh appellate consideration, emphasizing proper evidence appraisal and adequate reasoning by the appellate court.

civil remanded Significant probate Indian Succession Act Section 276 Will validity

M/s Cochin Shipyard Ltd v. M/s Apeejay Shipping Ltd

06 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, legal misconduct must be established from the arbitral record and fresh oral evidence in court to prove such misconduct is impermissible.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Section 30 legal misconduct arbitral award

VNS College of Physical Education and Management Studies v. State of Madhya Pradesh

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the State's restriction of admissions to candidates who appeared in the Vyapam entrance exam and dismissed the plea of private colleges to conduct college-level counseling for vacant seats.

administrative appeal_dismissed college-level counseling admission rules 2008 Vyapam entrance examination private educational institutions

Jupudy Pardha Sarathy v. Pentapati Rama Krishna

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a Hindu widow's limited life interest in property granted by Will is enlarged into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, extinguishing any vested remainder interests.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14(1) life estate Hindu widow

Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani v. State of Maharashtra

06 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the State Government has concurrent and superior revisional jurisdiction under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, permitting a second revision, and upheld the Minister's order restoring mutation entries in favor of respondents.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 257 revision jurisdiction State Government revisional power