Supreme Court of India

18,343 judgments

Year:

A. Andisamy Chettiar v. A. Subburaj Chettiar

08 Dec 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the appellate court's order allowing additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and directed the appellate court to reconsider the application afresh.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 41 Rule 27 CPC additional evidence appellate court Section 115 CPC

M/S. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

07 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act is not payable on differential excise duty arising from retrospective price escalation agreed after removal of goods.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 11AB interest on delayed payment transaction value

Parivartan Kendra v. Union of India

07 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan · (2015) 5 SCALE 77
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for acid attack victims beyond the minimum prescribed, directed timely payment and comprehensive medical care, and emphasized State responsibility for victim rehabilitation and regulation of acid sale.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acid attack compensation victim rehabilitation Section 357A CrPC

Maya Devi v. State of Haryana

07 Dec 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Sections 304B and 498A IPC, affirming that continuous dowry-related harassment soon before death creates a rebuttable presumption of dowry death, which the accused failed to disprove.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Evidence Act

Susana Rani David v. Esther Jaspher Swaminathan

07 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed appeals to permit exhibition of a sale deed affecting a party's property share and directed the High Court to reconsider its judgment accordingly, upholding the compromise deed for other parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant sale deed compromise deed property dispute share of defendant

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD v. HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.

04 Dec 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; VIKRAMAJIT SEN; PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE

The Supreme Court reaffirmed that under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the opposite party must file its version within a maximum of 45 days, and this limitation period is mandatory and cannot be extended.

civil other Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13(2)(a) limitation period written statement

CIT (CENTRAL) KANPUR & ORS v. RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA

04 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of recent legal principles.

tax appeal_allowed Significant remand High Court order Special Leave Petition Income Tax

OPG Securities Private Ltd. v. S.E.B.I. & Anr.

04 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that after Schedule IIIA's applicability, SEBI cannot demand registration fees under Schedule III for turnover accrued thereafter, and fees must be paid monthly as per Schedule IIIA.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI registration fee Schedule III Schedule IIIA stock-broker turnover

M/S. ADANI POWER LTD. v. GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

03 Dec 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court declined interim relief on tariff payments during the pendency of an appeal challenging PPA termination, allowing the state agency discretion to pay compensatory tariff subject to the appeal's outcome.

administrative other Power Purchase Agreement termination of contract compensatory tariff Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Union of India & Anr. v. Rajbir Singh

03 Dec 2015 · T.S. Thakur; J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of armed forces personnel to disability pension where disabilities were presumed service-related absent reasoned medical rebuttal, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and burden on employer to disprove service connection.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 medical board opinion

Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.

02 Dec 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Pinaki Chandra... · 2014 (11) SCC 1
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that life imprisonment means imprisonment for the convict's natural life subject to remission by the Appropriate Government, clarified the scope of executive remission powers under the Constitution and CrPC, and upheld the maintainability of the Union's writ petition challenging State remission in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant life imprisonment remission executive power Article 72

Sujoy Mitra v. State of West Bengal

02 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court prescribed detailed safeguards for recording testimony of a foreign witness via video conferencing under Section 278 CrPC, holding that furnishing recorded video testimony to the accused is not mandatory for a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant video conferencing witness testimony Section 278 CrPC Section 376 IPC

Purushottam v. State of Karnataka

02 Dec 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman · 2014(3)SCC 721

The Supreme Court held that allotment of a civic amenity site for a petrol pump by the Bangalore Development Authority was valid under the Act, dismissing challenges based on alleged earmarking for a Bank.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Section 38A civic amenity petrol pump

Vennangot Anuradha Samir v. Vennangot Mohandas Samir

02 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of a divorce suit and held that divorce by mutual consent requires free and voluntary consent not vitiated by undue influence, especially where the wife suffers from a life-threatening illness.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce by mutual consent free consent undue influence pre-existing duty doctrine

M/S ADANI AGRI FRESH LTD v. MAHABOOB SHARIF & ORS

02 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that injunctions restraining invocation of unconditional bank guarantees are impermissible except in cases of established fraud or irretrievable injustice, and set aside the interim injunctions against the appellant's bank guarantees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unconditional bank guarantee injunction invocation of bank guarantee fraud

Nuney Tayang v. Kodelum Tayang & Others

01 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court remitted the dispute over compensation for acquired tribal community land to the District Judge for a fresh enquiry to identify rightful owners and apportion compensation without mandating formal Land Acquisition Act proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Denning Reserve Forest Land Acquisition Act, 1894 community land tribal land rights

Madan Razak v. State of Bihar and others

01 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that delayed recording of witness statements does not justify quashing criminal proceedings if a prima facie case exists, and restored the summoning order for trial in a rape and murder case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC summoning order prima facie case delayed witness statements

Rukmani Devi & Others v. Jaipur Development Authority & Anr.

01 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that the State's policy circular providing 15% developed land in lieu of compensation is enforceable, directing the Jaipur Development Authority to allot such land to appellants, setting aside the High Court's dismissal.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition developed land allotment Jaipur Development Authority policy circular

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. v. NILOUFER SIDDIQUI & ORS.

01 Dec 2015 · V. GOPALA GOWDA; AMITAVA ROY
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that IOCL's termination of LPG distributorship without supplying or executing the standard agreement and without just cause was illegal and arbitrary, directing restoration of distributorship and emphasizing constitutional fairness in government contracts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant distributorship termination unexecuted agreement unconscionable contract clause Article 14 Constitution of India

Medical Council of India v. Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences

01 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that the Medical Council of India need not conduct a re-inspection of a medical college failing to meet minimum standards and set aside the High Court's direction for such inspection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Medical college inspection Increase in MBBS intake Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999