Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Madan Razak v. State of Bihar and others

01 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that delayed recording of witness statements does not justify quashing criminal proceedings if a prima facie case exists, and restored the summoning order for trial in a rape and murder case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC summoning order prima facie case delayed witness statements

Rukmani Devi & Others v. Jaipur Development Authority & Anr.

01 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that the State's policy circular providing 15% developed land in lieu of compensation is enforceable, directing the Jaipur Development Authority to allot such land to appellants, setting aside the High Court's dismissal.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition developed land allotment Jaipur Development Authority policy circular

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. v. NILOUFER SIDDIQUI & ORS.

01 Dec 2015 · V. GOPALA GOWDA; AMITAVA ROY
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that IOCL's termination of LPG distributorship without supplying or executing the standard agreement and without just cause was illegal and arbitrary, directing restoration of distributorship and emphasizing constitutional fairness in government contracts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant distributorship termination unexecuted agreement unconscionable contract clause Article 14 Constitution of India

Medical Council of India v. Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences

01 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that the Medical Council of India need not conduct a re-inspection of a medical college failing to meet minimum standards and set aside the High Court's direction for such inspection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Medical college inspection Increase in MBBS intake Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999

Rajni Sanghi v. Western Indian State Motors Ltd.

01 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld family settlements approved by courts over a pending arbitration award, holding the award 'otherwise invalid' under Section 30(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, emphasizing the binding nature of family arrangements and court orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Family settlement Section 30(c) Arbitration Act Hindu law family arrangement

Poona Employees Union v. Force Motors Limited & Another

01 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of Industrial Court's recognition of the appellant union, holding that reliance on affidavits to prove majority membership was impermissible and the appellant failed to comply with statutory requirements under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant recognized union trade union recognition Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 membership verification

Securities & Exchange Board of India v. Magnum Equity Services Ltd.

30 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that fee continuity under SEBI regulations requires only one erstwhile partner to remain Whole-time Director holding 40% equity for three years, and that SEBI's 2002 circular imposing stricter conditions is not retrospective.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant fee continuity corporatization SEBI regulations Whole-time Director

Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar v. Union of India

30 Nov 2015 · B.V. Nagarathna; K.M. Joseph
Cites 0 · Cited by 50

The Supreme Court held that a child adopted by the widow of a deceased government servant after his death is not entitled to family pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant family pension adoption by widow Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

D.V. Sadananada Gowda v. K.G. Nagalaxmi Bai

27 Nov 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; S.A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that amalgamation of plots without subdivision and construction conforming to sanctioned plans do not violate lease terms, and courts must not usurp statutory authorities' discretion in property lease enforcement.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease-cum-sale agreement plot amalgamation building plan sanction Bangalore Development Authority

Ram Charan Singh Prajapati v. State of U.P.

26 Nov 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by Ram Charan Singh Prajapati, upholding the impugned judgment without imposing costs, relying on the reasoning in a related appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed civil appeal impugned judgment appeal dismissed leave granted

State of U.P. & Ors. v. Ajay Kumar Sharma & Anr.

26 Nov 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appointments and renewals of District Government Counsel are discretionary professional engagements governed by Section 24 Cr.P.C. and the LR Manual, and set aside the High Court order directing mandatory renewal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant District Government Counsel appointment renewal Section 24 Cr.P.C.

Vindu Kishore Sharma v. Chancellor, Chaudhary Charan Singh University

26 Nov 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that failure to exercise a required written option to continue under an earlier Personal Promotion Scheme bars promotion claims under that scheme after amended schemes are introduced.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Personal Promotion Scheme Section 31A Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act written option promotion revocation

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ashwani Kumar

26 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that under the Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972, the permissible landholding of a family and its members must be aggregated and cannot exceed the statutory ceiling, reversing the High Court's order allowing separate permissible units to each family member.

property appeal_allowed Significant Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 permissible area land ceiling family definition

A.R. Dahiya v. SEBI

26 Nov 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of a buy-back transaction involving post-dated cheques constituted an acquisition triggering SEBI disclosure obligations, dismissing the appellant's appeal and upholding SEBI's directions for a fresh public offer at the highest price paid.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Regulations Substantial Acquisition of Shares Takeover Regulations Buy-back of shares

Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. v. Shree Lal Meena

26 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that resignation prior to the introduction of voluntary retirement provisions cannot be equated with voluntary retirement for pension benefits under the 1995 Rules, pending larger Bench consideration.

service_law other Significant voluntary retirement resignation pension entitlement retrospective application

State of Uttar Pradesh v. United Bank of India

26 Nov 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a mortgage of Government (Nazul) land without State sanction is void, the Bank had no right to convert leasehold into freehold, and the State's resumption notice was valid.

property appeal_allowed Significant Nazul land Government Grants Act, 1895 Mortgage Leasehold

SEBI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN v. ROOFIT INDUSTRIES LTD.

26 Nov 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that penalties under Section 15A(a) of the SEBI Act, 1992 as amended in 2002 are mandatory without discretion for reduction on extraneous grounds, and the default by Roofit Industries was a one-time default attracting pre-amendment penalty provisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI Act 1992 Section 15A penalty Section 15J factors discretion in penalty

Shamsher Singh Verma v. State of Haryana

24 Nov 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a compact disc containing recorded conversations is admissible evidence under Section 294 CrPC and must be allowed to be examined by the defence to uphold the right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 294 CrPC compact disc evidence right of defence tape-recorded conversation

Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/S Nestle India Limited

24 Nov 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that valuation of goods cleared by a 100% EOU to sister units in India must follow exemption notifications and Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, not customs valuation under Section 3(1) proviso (ii), dismissing the revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant 100% Export Oriented Unit Central Excise Valuation Rule 8 Central Excise Rules Section 3(1) Proviso (ii) Central Excise Act

M/S. SHREE BHAGWATI STEEL ROLLING MILLS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & ANR.

24 Nov 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that omission of a statutory provision amounts to repeal, interest cannot be levied without statutory authority, and mandatory penalty provisions under certain Central Excise Rules are ultra vires and violate constitutional rights.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 3A General Clauses Act, 1897 omission vs repeal