Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University

15 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a deemed university performing public functions is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, allowing the appellant's writ petition to be maintainable and remanding the matter for merits consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 deemed university public function

M/S MASTER TOURS AND TRAVELS v. THE CHAIRMAN, SHRI AMARNATH JI SHRINE BOARD

15 Dec 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a clause providing for final decision by a designated official is not an arbitration clause and directed the dispute to be resolved by the Chief Executive Officer within a time frame.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant dispute resolution clause arbitration clause interpretation of contract final decision by official

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore v. M/S. TVS Motors Company Ltd.

15 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that pre-delivery inspection and free after sales service charges incurred by dealers but not recovered from them by manufacturers are not includible in the assessable value for excise duty under amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant assessable value pre-delivery inspection charges after sales service charges transaction value

M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES & ORS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I

14 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that cold-rolling of hot-rolled stainless steel strips amounts to manufacture attracting central excise duty and upheld the extended limitation period for duty recovery.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant cold-rolling manufacture central excise duty Section 2(f)(i) Central Excise Act

Calcutta Stock Exchange v. BLB Limited

11 Dec 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal seeking to summon irrelevant documents in a recovery suit, affirming that civil courts should not entertain collateral investigations and emphasizing the necessity of document relevance under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XVI Rule 1 CPC relevance of documents collateral investigation SEBI Act Section 11C

Shakti Kumar Gupta v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and another

11 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the premature retirement of a judicial officer despite setting aside an adverse Annual Confidential Report based solely on non-submission of a self-assessment report, emphasizing the discretionary power of the High Court to retire officers in public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant premature retirement Annual Confidential Report self-assessment report Higher Judicial Service Rules

Rajbala & Others v. State of Haryana & Others

10 Dec 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of educational and other disqualifications for contesting Panchayat elections under the Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015, affirming the State Legislature's competence to prescribe reasonable qualifications consistent with Article 14.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Panchayati Raj Article 14 Right to contest election Disqualifications

Nanuram Mohanlal Varma v. Divisional Controller

10 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the appellant to return 50% of back wages to the respondent within four weeks without interest, imposing 6% interest if delayed, thereby partially allowing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed back wages repayment interest civil appeal

Bipinchandra Gamanlal Chokshi v. State of Gujarat

10 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a detenu released immediately after Emergency revocation retains the right to challenge his detention order, allowing such challenge despite prior non-action during Emergency, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant COFEPOSA Act Section 12A Preventive Detention Emergency

Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan; Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

09 Dec 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court set aside Ram Singh's conviction due to lack of eyewitness evidence and granted Mahendra Singh the benefit of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, modifying his sentence while maintaining conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Section 20 Juvenile Justice Act juvenility determination conviction under IPC Sections 148, 302, 149

Shobha Ram Raturi v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

09 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that an employee whose premature retirement was quashed is entitled to back wages for the period restrained from work, rejecting the employer's plea of "no work, no pay."

civil appeal_allowed Significant premature retirement back wages no work no pay continuous service

Premium Global Securities Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Securities & Exchange Board of India & Anr.

09 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that transferring stock exchange membership to a subsidiary company to comply with SEBI regulations constitutes compulsion of law, entitling the appellant to fee continuity benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fee continuity compulsion of law Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules, 1957 SEBI circular 30.9.2002

SODEXO SVC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

09 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that Sodexo Meal Vouchers are not 'goods' but represent a service, and thus are not liable to Octroi or Local Body Tax under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Sodexo Meal Vouchers goods vs service Local Body Tax Octroi

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD v. A.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD

09 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that LPG and water storage tanks qualify as 'houses' under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, making them liable to property tax, and dismissed Indian Oil Corporation's challenge to the tax demands.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant property tax Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 definition of house storage tanks

S.K. Verma v. Union of India

09 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals but directed an ex-gratia payment to the appellant's widow to settle the dispute and barred future litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed civil appeal ex-gratia payment litigation settlement appeal dismissal

Sat Parkash v. State of Haryana

09 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of Sat Parkash under Section 366-A IPC, holding that inducing a minor to go with intent to force or seduce her to illicit intercourse with another person was not proved, and acquitted him of kidnapping and rape charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping procuration of minor Section 366-A IPC suicide note

M/S GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD & ANR. v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS

09 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Uttarakhand State Legislature lacked competence to levy market fee on agricultural produce brought into the market area solely for manufacturing, striking down the relevant provision of the Act as unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant legislative competence market fee development cess Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Act

Prajwala v. Union of India

09 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court disposed of the writ petition on trafficking after the Government committed to establishing a specialized agency and constituting a Committee to draft comprehensive anti-trafficking legislation.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant trafficking victim protection Organized Crime Investigative Agency comprehensive legislation

Sri Ch. Narasimha Rao v. Land Acquisition Officer, Eluru

09 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that limitation for filing Reference Applications under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act begins from the date of final confirmation of acquisition, allowing delayed applications filed promptly after such confirmation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18(1) limitation reference application

Ruchika Abbi & Anr. v. State of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court directed the Family Court to decide the custody dispute of a minor child on merits within six months, granted temporary custody to the father, and emphasized parental cooperation for the child's welfare.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody dispute minor child welfare habeas corpus petition Family Court jurisdiction