Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

16 Dec 2015 · T.S. Thakur; A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi · (2003) 10 SCC 561
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed stricter vehicular pollution control measures in Delhi, including diversion of non-Delhi bound vehicles, increased ECC, vehicle entry restrictions, diesel vehicle registration bans, mandatory CNG conversion for taxis, and enforcement of pollution norms to combat severe air pollution.

environmental_law appeal_allowed Significant Environment Compensation Charge vehicular pollution Delhi pollution control vehicle diversion

Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry

16 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that RBI and banks can withhold certain inspection and penalty-related information under RTI exemptions protecting economic interests, fiduciary relationships, and commercial confidence, balancing transparency with confidentiality.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(a) Section 8(1)(d) Section 8(1)(e)

Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi & Ors.

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree recognizing the suit property as joint family property purchased from insurance proceeds, dismissing the appellant's challenge on procedural and substantive grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint family property insurance nomination Hindu widow Karta vs Manager

Mangu Singh v. Dharmendra & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a double murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the unreliability of FIRs, eyewitnesses, and confessional statements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant motive FIR ante-timed FIR eyewitness testimony

Prem Nath Bali v. Delhi & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld compulsory retirement after a fair departmental inquiry but directed that the appellant's prolonged suspension period be counted for pension benefits due to undue delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry compulsory retirement principles of natural justice suspension period

Sri Jagannath Temple Managing Committee v. Siddha Math & Ors.

16 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955, being a special statute, prevails over the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951, and the disputed lands vest in the Temple Managing Committee, overruling prior conflicting decisions rendered per incuriam.

property appeal_allowed Significant Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 amrutamanohi properties special statute vs general statute

Gautam Kundu v. Manoj Kumar, Assistant Director

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's refusal of bail to the appellant in a money laundering case under PMLA, affirming the overriding effect of PMLA's bail provisions and the serious nature of economic offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 24 SEBI Act Section 12A SEBI Act bail under PMLA

Rajiv Singh v. State of Bihar & Another

16 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of dowry death and related charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove the death of the victim and unreliability of forensic evidence.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant dowry harassment Section 304B IPC DNA evidence dead body identification

Nala Sangam & Ors. v. Government of Tamil Nadu & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that appointments of Archakas in Hindu temples must conform to essential religious practices prescribed by the Agamas, protecting religious freedoms under Articles 25 and 26 against executive orders disregarding such customs.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Articles 25 and 26 freedom of religion Hindu religious practices appointment of Archakas

K.B. Ramachandra Raje Urs v. State of Karnataka

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court invalidated land acquisition under the City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 due to procedural non-compliance but allowed partial retention of land by the allottee considering equitable factors and directed compensation to rightful owners.

property appeal_allowed Significant City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 land acquisition development scheme government sanction

Bimla Devi v. Rajesh Singh & Anr

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld life sentences for four accused in a double murder family feud case, acquitted one accused due to lack of evidence, and declined to impose the death penalty, emphasizing benefit of doubt and procedural fairness.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt FIR delay inquest report overwriting rarest of rare

Narender Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld convictions based on a reliable dying declaration recorded despite minor procedural defects, rejecting alibi and false implication pleas in a custodial burning death case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 330 IPC police custody

State of Maharashtra v. Hemant Kawadu Chauriwal

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder and cruelty case due to unreliable dying declaration, inadequate proof of letters, and defective investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt cruelty burn injuries

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India

16 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian... · (1993) 4 SCC 441

The Supreme Court held that the executive, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, must finalize the Memorandum of Procedure for judicial appointments, incorporating transparency and accountability measures, while the Court provided broad guidelines to improve the collegium system.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant collegium system judicial appointments Memorandum of Procedure transparency

State of Punjab v. Bittu & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on incomplete and doubtful circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder hostile witnesses benefit of doubt

Gian Chand v. Gurlabh Singh

15 Dec 2015 · Arun Mishra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held the bus driver and owner liable for rash and negligent driving causing death in an accident, awarding enhanced compensation to the claimants and setting aside prior findings of no liability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 rash and negligent driving compensation

LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUST v. MAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS

15 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the single member Waqf Tribunal retains jurisdiction over waqf property disputes until a three member Tribunal is constituted by the State Government, rejecting the High Court's order transferring jurisdiction to civil courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Waqf Act, 1995 Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 Section 83(4) single member Tribunal

Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University

15 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a deemed university performing public functions is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, allowing the appellant's writ petition to be maintainable and remanding the matter for merits consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 deemed university public function

M/S MASTER TOURS AND TRAVELS v. THE CHAIRMAN, SHRI AMARNATH JI SHRINE BOARD

15 Dec 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a clause providing for final decision by a designated official is not an arbitration clause and directed the dispute to be resolved by the Chief Executive Officer within a time frame.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant dispute resolution clause arbitration clause interpretation of contract final decision by official

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore v. M/S. TVS Motors Company Ltd.

15 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that pre-delivery inspection and free after sales service charges incurred by dealers but not recovered from them by manufacturers are not includible in the assessable value for excise duty under amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant assessable value pre-delivery inspection charges after sales service charges transaction value