Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Tukesh Singh & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh

14 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 683

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to failure of eyewitnesses to identify accused in court and material contradictions in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the necessity of reliable identification for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness identification reasonable doubt omnibus statements material omissions

M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA

14 May 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; JOYMALYA BAGCHI · 2025 INSC 689

The Supreme Court held that the MSMED Act overrides arbitration agreements and the Arbitration Act, empowering the Facilitation Council to conduct arbitration irrespective of the contractual seat, restoring arbitration proceedings before the Delhi Arbitration Centre.

civil appeal_allowed Significant MSMED Act 2006 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Facilitation Council jurisdiction arbitration seat

Brig Sandeep Chaudhary v. Union of India & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 685
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that biased and concealed adverse ratings in confidential reports must be expunged and directed reconsideration of promotion, granting relief to a decorated army officer denied promotion due to mala fide assessments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report ACR mala fide promotion

The State of Telangana & Ors. v. Dr. Pasupuleti Nirmala Hanumantha Rao Charitable Trust

14 May 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 679

The Supreme Court held that State land allotment under a statutory scheme with conditions is not a sale, and such conditions including resumption rights are valid and not void under Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant land allotment statutory scheme Transfer of Property Act Section 10 resumption of land

HP Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Brua Hydrowatt Pvt. Ltd.

14 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 680

The Supreme Court held that only the party to the Connection Agreement, BHP Ltd, is liable for the entire Bay charges, rejecting the Appellate Tribunal's decision to absolve it of full liability due to absence of privity of contract with other generating companies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Connection Agreement Bay charges Privity of contract Electricity Act, 2003

LAL MOHD. & ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

14 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 811

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under the UP Gangsters Act for lack of evidence of organized gang activity, holding that mere participation in a single violent protest does not satisfy the Act's requirements and that the FIR was a mala fide abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UP Gangsters Act quashing of FIR gang definition organized crime

Tushar Himatlal Jani v. Jasbir Singh Vijan

13 May 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 663
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s injunction restraining the property owner’s redevelopment rights over a small disputed portion, emphasizing the need for prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury before granting interim relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction tenancy rights family settlement agreement possession

OFFICE FOR ALTERNATIVE ARCHITECTURE v. IRCON INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES LTD.

13 May 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 665

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and cannot exclude claims as non-arbitrable at the appointment stage, leaving such issues to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement non-arbitrable claims

AASHISH YADAV v. YASHPAL & ORS.

13 May 2025 · K. V. Viswanathan; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 666

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for main accused in a contract killing case, holding that bail cannot be granted merely on parity with co-accused and emphasizing the need to consider conspiracy and risk of absconding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail parity main accused contract killer

Chaddarwala v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

13 May 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 664

The Supreme Court held that offences committed after withdrawal of a suit and tampering with archived court records do not attract the bar under Section 195 CrPC, allowing cognizance on FIR without a complaint by the presiding officer.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 195 CrPC custodia legis court proceedings tampering with court records

Thirunagalingam v. Lingeswaran & Anr.

13 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 672
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a 1116-day delay in filing an appeal against an ex-parte decree, holding that repeated grounds for delay already rejected by courts cannot justify condonation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay ex-parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Order XLI Rule 3A CPC

Deep Shikha & Anr v. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 675

The Supreme Court held that a married daughter must prove financial dependence to claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, but an elderly mother living with and dependent on the deceased is entitled to enhanced compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140 compensation dependency

Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd v. Haresh

13 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 669

The Supreme Court allowed substitution of the allotted apartment, directed payment of a quantified amount by the purchaser, and ordered execution of the sale agreement, balancing statutory provisions and equitable considerations under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 allotment cancellation alienation of property stay order violation

Vijay Kumar Joshi v. Akash Tripathi & Ors.

13 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 670

The Supreme Court held that employees absorbed from Co-operative Societies into MPSEB are entitled to pension benefits from the date of absorption, excluding pre-absorption service, ensuring parity and preventing discrimination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant absorption pension entitlement qualifying service functional integration

SHAIKH SADIK SHAIKH RAFIQUE v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.

13 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 673

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a completely disabled accident victim by adopting updated income and multiplier standards, affirming insurance coverage for an employee passenger in a goods vehicle.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation motor vehicle accident disability multiplier

Competition Commission of India v. Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd.

13 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 668
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Schott India’s discount schemes and agreements did not constitute abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act, emphasizing the necessity of effects-based analysis and procedural fairness, and set aside the CCI’s penalty order.

competition appeal_dismissed Significant abuse of dominant position Competition Act 2002 volume-based rebates functional rebates

NDA SECURITIES LTD. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

13 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 676

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order releasing disputed sale proceeds during ongoing investigation, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to decide disputed facts prematurely.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction mini trial fraud

P. SHANTHI PUGAZHENTHI v. STATE

13 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 674
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld conviction of a public servant for abetting her husband's acquisition of disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that non-public servants can be liable for abetment under section 13(1)(e).

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 section 13(1)(e)

Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

13 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 667
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court flagged serious concerns about the existing guidelines for designation of Senior Advocates under Section 16 of the Advocates Act and referred the matter for reconsideration to ensure a dignified, transparent, and merit-based process.

administrative other Significant Senior Advocate designation Section 16 Advocates Act Permanent Committee points-based assessment

Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh

13 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 671

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry cruelty case due to lack of specific evidence and held that vague allegations cannot sustain conviction under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act cruelty dowry demand