Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Prasannatma Das v. K.N. Haridasan Nambiar

16 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 717

The Supreme Court held that ISKCON Bangalore, not ISKCON Mumbai through its Bangalore branch, is the rightful owner of the disputed Bangalore property, setting aside the High Court's contrary finding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Societies Registration Act property ownership Bangalore Development Authority Schedule A property

Baljinder Singh Alias Aman v. State of Punjab & Anr

16 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 796

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic bail order in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, restoring the trial court's refusal of bail due to the gravity of the offence and accused's antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC criminal conspiracy trial court

19. The word ‘may’ gives discretion to the Court where it is alleged that the suit property is under threat and protection, preservation, management and improvement of the property, along with collection of rents and profits is required, then the Court ma

15 May 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 700

The Supreme Court directed expeditious resolution of long-pending temple management disputes, restricted prolonged Receiver appointments by advocates, and upheld the State's role in facilitating temple development while safeguarding religious freedoms.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Receiver appointment Temple management Order XL Rule 1 CPC Religious freedom

EBY CHERIAN v. JEREMA JOHN

15 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 709

The Supreme Court directed a structured interim visitation schedule for a non-custodial parent employed overseas, balancing child welfare and parental rights, and set aside the requirement for repeated custody applications pending final custody adjudication.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim custody visitation rights family court child welfare

M/S. INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION v. NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD

15 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 699
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's power under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 to award interest for pre-reference, pendente lite, and future periods including compound interest, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7) Interest award Pre-reference interest

Mohit Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh; State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. v. Kiran Prajapati

15 May 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 704
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that candidates must submit OBC certificates in the prescribed State Government format as mandated by recruitment notifications, and failure to do so justifies treating them as general category applicants, thereby rejecting their claim to reservation benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant OBC certificate recruitment notification reservation certificate format

Rajesh v. Union of India

15 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 705

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for illegal possession of wildlife products but reduced the sentence considering the appellants' age and investigation gaps.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 illegal wildlife trade possession of tiger skin proof beyond reasonable doubt

Virender Pal @ Vipin v. State of Haryana

15 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 710

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304-B IPC for dowry death, affirming that consistent evidence of harassment and dowry demand coupled with failure to rebut the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act justifies conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act unnatural death

V. S. R. MOHAN RAO v. K. S. R. MURTHY

15 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 708

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of the appellant as a land grabber under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing Act, emphasizing the statutory definition of land grabbing and the shifting burden of proof upon prima facie ownership.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land grabbing Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 land grabber adverse possession

POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED v. MADHYA PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED

15 May 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 697
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that CERC's regulatory and adjudicatory powers under Section 79 of the Electricity Act, 2003 include granting compensation for delay even without specific regulations under Section 178, and writ petitions challenging CERC orders are barred when efficacious alternative remedies exist under Section 111.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Section 79 Section 178

M/S GAYATRI PROJECT LIMITED v. MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

15 May 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 698
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1996 cannot be annulled on jurisdictional grounds if no such objection was raised before the tribunal, even where the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 applies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 jurisdictional objection Section 16(2)

Hansura Bai & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

15 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 711

The Supreme Court directed transfer of the investigation into a custodial death from local police to the CBI and emphasized protection for the sole eyewitness facing harassment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant custodial death investigation transfer independent agency Central Bureau of Investigation

M/S DHANBAD FUELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

15 May 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 696

The Supreme Court held that mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies prospectively from 20.08.2022, protecting suits instituted earlier from rejection and allowing them to be kept in abeyance for mediation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act pre-institution mediation Order VII Rule 11 CPC prospective overruling

Thirumalpad v. Union of India

15 May 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 701

The Supreme Court held that allotment and use of reserved forest land without Central Government approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is illegal, rejected the doctrine of desuetude and bona fide purchaser defense, and ordered cancellation of allotment and restoration of forest land.

environmental/administrative appeal_allowed Significant Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Reserved Forest Doctrine of desuetude Bona fide purchaser

THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SURAJ KUMAR & ORS.

15 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 707

The Supreme Court held that an insurer’s liability in motor accident claims is limited to monetary compensation and cannot extend to providing or maintaining prosthetic devices, directing a monetary enhancement instead.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability pecuniary compensation prosthetic limbs

Hansa Devi & Ors. v. SBI General Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

15 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 706
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Tribunal's compensation award for the deceased truck driver's family, rejecting the High Court's reduction of income and affirming loss of consortium claims for children and parents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of consortium assessment of income future prospects

Nagarajan & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu

15 May 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 703

The Supreme Court held that Section 20AA of the PoFA Act validly excludes probation for food adulteration offences and that reduced sentences under the repealing FSS Act are not applicable due to the savings clause, but converted imprisonment sentences to fines in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Probation of Offenders Act Section 20AA Food Safety and Standards Act

Kukreja and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

14 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 794
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against appellants in a contractual payment dispute, holding that the allegations disclosed only a civil dispute and criminal law was misused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR civil dispute vs criminal offence abuse of process of law contractual dispute

Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

14 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 684

The Supreme Court held that crude degummed soyabean oil is a manufactured product distinct from agricultural produce and that an administrative circular cannot restrict the scope of a statutory customs duty exemption notification, thereby entitling the appellant to duty exemption under the DFCE scheme.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Duty Free Credit Entitlement Customs duty exemption Agricultural product definition Manufacture test

Vijaya Bank & Anr. v. Prashant B Narnaware

14 May 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 691

The Supreme Court upheld a contractual clause requiring a minimum three-year service and liquidated damages for premature resignation, ruling it neither a restraint of trade nor opposed to public policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant restrictive covenant restraint of trade liquidated damages employment contract