Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Shital Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 743

The Supreme Court held that Section 80-IA(9) restricts aggregate deductions under Chapter VI-A heading 'C' to profits and gains already claimed but does not require reducing gross total income for computing other deductions like Section 80-HHC.

tax other Significant Section 80-IA Section 80-HHC Chapter VI-A Income Tax Act, 1961

Rampat Azad v. Union of India

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 740

The Supreme Court upheld the CAT and High Court orders denying the appellant promotion as Handicrafts Promotion Officer, affirming his regularisation and promotion rights solely within the cadre of Carpet Training Officer.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Regularisation Promotion Junior Field Officer Carpet Training Officer

Ramjee Prasad Jaiswal and Ors v. State of Bihar

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 738
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the convictions of appellants due to failure to comply with Section 313 CrPC and established juvenility of one appellant, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural fairness and juvenility claims in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC juvenility juvenile justice audi alteram partem

Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta & Ors.

20 May 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 739

The Supreme Court held that a plaint in a partition suit involving alleged joint Hindu family properties cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on benami grounds without evidence, dismissing the Special Leave Petitions challenging the rejection of such applications.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 benami property joint Hindu family property

M/S ANVITAAUTO TECH WORKS PVT. LTD. v. M/S AROUSH MOTORS & ANR.

20 May 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1202

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal holding that the COVID-19 limitation extension applies to the mandatory 120-day period for filing written statements in commercial suits and that non-filing does not extinguish the right to cross-examination, thereby remanding the case for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement commercial suit 120 days limitation COVID-19 limitation extension

Shivappa Reddy v. S. Srinivasan

19 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 729

The Supreme Court held that a partner cannot escape liability under Section 138 NI Act without complying with statutory retirement procedures under the Indian Partnership Act and set aside the High Court's quashing of proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Indian Partnership Act retirement public notice of retirement

State of Lokayuktha Police v. C B Nagaraj

19 May 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 736
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant accused of accepting a bribe, holding that demand must be proved beyond reasonable doubt before the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act applies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 20 presumption demand and acceptance of bribe phenolphthalein test

Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal

19 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 734

The Supreme Court held that High Courts can exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings under Section 12(1) of the DV Act, 2005, but must do so cautiously to prevent abuse of process without defeating the Act's protective purpose.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 DV Act Section 482 CrPC Inherent jurisdiction

M/s Patanjali Foods Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 733

The Supreme Court held that encashment of bank guarantees furnished as security does not amount to payment of customs duty, rendering the doctrine of unjust enrichment inapplicable and directing refund of amounts unlawfully retained by the Department.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 27 unjust enrichment bank guarantee

In Re: Refixation of Pension Considering Service Period in District Judiciary and High Court v. Union of India

19 May 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 726

The Supreme Court held that pension for retired High Court Judges must include service as District Judges, disallowing discrimination based on source of appointment or break-in service, thereby upholding judicial independence and equality under the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant High Court Judges pension District Judiciary service Break-in service Additional Judges pension

Rofiqul Hoque v. Union of India & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Manoj Misra; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 730
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Foreigners Tribunal's declaration of the appellant as a foreigner, ruling that inclusion in the draft NRC does not invalidate such a declaration.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Foreigners Act, 1946 Section 9 burden of proof Foreigners Tribunal National Register of Citizens (NRC)

Rajo Devi & Anr. v. Manjeet Kaur & Ors.

19 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 741

The Supreme Court set aside the finding of contributory negligence in a motor accident case, enhanced compensation to the dependants of deceased motorcyclists, and admitted new evidence to ensure just relief under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contributory negligence motor accident claim compensation assessment eyewitness testimony

GOPAL DIKSHIT v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

19 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 731
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal holding that damage caused by flooding due to heavy rainfall is covered under the insurance policy and set aside the insurer's repudiation based on seepage, remanding the matter for compensation determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim flood damage seepage survey report

Hakim v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

19 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 728
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for acid attack under Section 326A IPC, reduced the sentence of one appellant on humanitarian grounds, and reaffirmed limited scope for interference in concurrent criminal findings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acid attack Section 326A IPC concurrent findings interference in criminal appeal

All India Judges Association and Others v. Union of India and Others

16 May 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; K. Vinod Chandran

The Supreme Court directs uniform framing and implementation of service rules for Court Managers nationwide, regularizing contractual incumbents subject to suitability tests, to enhance judicial administration efficiency.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Court Managers Thirteenth Finance Commission regularization service conditions

VANASHAKTI v. UNION OF INDIA

16 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 718

The Supreme Court struck down the 2017 EIA notification and 2021 OM permitting ex post facto environmental clearance as illegal, reaffirming that environmental clearance must be prior and protecting the fundamental right to a pollution-free environment under Article 21.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant ex post facto environmental clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 EIA Notification, 2006 Article 21 Constitution

Saraswati Devi & Ors. v. Santosh Singh & Ors.

16 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 715

The Supreme Court held that a permanent injunction decree is enforceable perpetually and successive execution petitions cannot be barred by res judicata or limitation, restoring the execution petition for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent prohibitory injunction execution petition res judicata Section 47 CPC

Raghunath Sharma v. State of Haryana

16 May 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 723
Cites 5 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot recall its order quashing an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. once the judgment is signed, except in limited circumstances not present here, and set aside the order restoring the FIR.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 362 Cr.P.C. inherent powers quashing of FIR

P KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

16 May 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 725

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's denial of anticipatory bail in a serious corruption case, clarifying the limited role of confessional statements and police statements of accused in bail proceedings and emphasizing the need for fair investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail confessional statements Section 30 Indian Evidence Act Section 161 CrPC statements

The State of Kerala v. The Principal, KMCT Medical College

16 May 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 518

The Supreme Court held that the Kerala Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee lacked statutory authority to create a corpus fund from NRI student fees without legislation, quashed the Government Order directing such fund, but allowed self-financing medical colleges to retain collected amounts subject to their use for subsidizing BPL students.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee corpus fund NRI students self-financing medical colleges