Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

HITESH UMESHBHAI MASHRU v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

18 Feb 2025 · BELA M. TRIVEDI; PRASANNA B. VARALE · 2025 INSC 246

The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail to the appellant in a cheating and sexual offence case after the charge-sheet was filed, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and conditional bail.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 493 IPC Section 376(2)(n) IPC charge-sheet

Nergish Sunavala v. Private Limited & Others

18 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 241

The Supreme Court quashed criminal defamation proceedings against media personnel for non-compliance with mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC and lack of specific allegations against non-editors, reinforcing procedural safeguards and freedom of speech.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal defamation Section 202 CrPC inquiry editorial director liability Press and Registration of Books Act

In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail

18 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 239

The Supreme Court clarified that remission of sentences must be granted fairly under a policy framework with procedural safeguards including notice, reasons, and opportunity to be heard, ensuring protection of convicts' constitutional rights.

criminal other Significant remission of sentence Section 432 CrPC Section 473 BNSS premature release

Udhaw Singh v. Enforcement Directorate

17 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 247
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court granted bail to an appellant under PMLA due to unreasonable trial delay violating the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act PMLA bail speedy trial Article 21

State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy

17 Feb 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 229

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary inquiry is not mandatory before FIR registration under the PC Act if information discloses a cognizable offence, and the Superintendent of Police validly directed FIR registration and investigation based on a detailed source information report.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Preliminary inquiry FIR registration Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17 PC Act

State of Punjab & Ors. v. Trishala Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

17 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 231
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld that reduction of input tax credit on stock in trade by delegated legislation is invalid before the enabling statutory amendment, protecting vested tax credit rights.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant input tax credit Punjab VAT Act Rule 21(8) delegated legislation

Jatinder Kumar Sapra v. Anupama Sapra

17 Feb 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 237

The Supreme Court held that its decree granting permanent alimony is a full and final settlement of all maintenance claims, dismissing the application to include maintenance arrears and closing pending maintenance proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Significant permanent alimony maintenance arrears matrimonial dispute irretrievable breakdown of marriage

SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF TELANGANA LTD. v. B RAMESH

17 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 326

The Supreme Court held that a candidate failing a physical test due to non-permanent injury is not entitled to appointment without following the prescribed selection process, upholding the principle of equality of opportunity under Article 16.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 16 Constitution of India equality of opportunity public employment physical test

Shanti & Ors. v. National Insurance Company

17 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 234

The Supreme Court held that interest on delayed compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, is mandatorily 12% per annum from the due date, and the insurer is liable to pay such interest without recourse to recover from the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act 1923 Section 4A(3)(a) interest on compensation insurance liability

Western Coal Fields Ltd. v. Manohar Govinda Fulzele

17 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran

The Supreme Court held that gratuity can be forfeited under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for misconduct constituting an offence involving moral turpitude without requiring criminal conviction, allowing partial or full forfeiture based on the gravity of misconduct.

labor appeal_allowed Significant forfeiture of gratuity Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 moral turpitude disciplinary proceedings

Jagdish Chand Memorial Trust v. State of Himachal Pradesh

17 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 232
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful withdrawal of an invalidly issued No Objection Certificate for an Ayurvedic Medical College, holding that non-compliance with Rules of Business renders such grants void and not protected by promissory estoppel or natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant No Objection Certificate Rules of Business Council of Ministers promissory estoppel

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Others

17 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai · 2025 INSC 754

The Supreme Court held that Zudpi Jungle lands are forest lands under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, accepted the CEC's nuanced recommendations allowing certain historical allotments to be excluded from forest classification without compensatory afforestation, and mandated strict action against unauthorized post-1996 allotments.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Zudpi Jungle Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Forest land classification Non-forest use

Kalyani Transco v. M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited & Ors.

17 Feb 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 621

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the IBC are maintainable by all aggrieved stakeholders, emphasized strict compliance with Section 29A eligibility, and clarified the limited jurisdiction of NCLT/NCLAT over public law matters such as ED's attachment under PMLA.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Resolution Plan Section 29A eligibility

Punimati & Anr. v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

17 Feb 2025 · Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1454
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite contradictions and hostile witnesses, dismissing the appeals of the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC interested witness hostile witnesses

Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh v. Bihar Legislative Council

15 Feb 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 264
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the expulsion of a legislative council member was disproportionate and unconstitutional, affirming judicial review over legislative disciplinary actions and substituting the punishment with suspension.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 212(1) Constitution of India Ethics Committee Bihar Legislative Council expulsion of member

Tapas Kumar Palit v. State of Chhattisgarh

14 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 222
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in a UAPA case due to inordinate trial delay, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 and the need for prosecutorial discretion in witness examination.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail speedy trial Article 21 UAPA

M/S. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

14 Feb 2025 · SANJIV KHANNA; SANJAY KUMAR; K.V. VISWANATHAN · 2025 INSC 215
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of a bidder who made a patent mistake in the bid amount, directing partial payment as consequence and return of the bank guarantee, emphasizing equitable relief and proportionality in public tender disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unilateral mistake bid security equitable relief public procurement

JSW STEEL LTD. v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MUMBAI PORT TRUST MUMBAI

14 Feb 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 257
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that systemic delay cannot bar adjudication of a pure legal question under Article 226 and liability for wreck removal under the Indian Ports Act lies on the vessel owner, not a third party who deposited security under protest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Indian Ports Act 1908 wreck removal liability systemic delay

Vinod @ Nasmulla v. The State of Chhattisgarh

14 Feb 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 220

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dacoity case due to unreliable identification and doubtful arrest and recovery evidence, emphasizing the limited evidentiary value of TIP without examination of participating witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade dock identification dacoity recovery of weapon

M/S. B N PADMANABHAIAH AND SONS v. R N NADIGAR & ORS

14 Feb 2025 · R. Mahadevan; J.B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 214

The Supreme Court held that a decree for permanent injunction is binding only on parties to the suit and does not bar a subsequent representative suit by third parties challenging title, dismissing the latter suit for lack of locus standi and maintainability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata locus standi permanent injunction representative suit