Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

B.S YEDDIYURAPPA v. A ALAM PASHA

21 Apr 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; MANOJ MISRA · 2025 INSC 515

The Supreme Court refrained from deciding the applicability of sanction provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act pending a larger bench ruling on whether a Magistrate takes cognizance while directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, and accordingly tagged the present petitions with the larger bench matter.

criminal other Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17A PC Act Section 19 PC Act Section 156(3) CrPC

N. Eswaranathan v. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police

17 Apr 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 509

The Supreme Court dismissed a second Special Leave Petition filed after dismissal of the first, held the Advocate-on-Record and assisting advocate guilty of professional misconduct and contempt for misleading the Court, and imposed disciplinary sanctions while accepting their unconditional apology.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Advocate-on-Record misuse of process of law contempt of court professional misconduct

ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD.

17 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 507
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-service of Section 21 notice and non-joinder under Section 11 do not bar impleading parties who are bound by the arbitration agreement, affirming the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction under Section 16 to decide such issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 21 notice Section 11 application Section 16 jurisdiction

D.B. Ravikumar v. G.S. Suresh

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 514
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that an FIR disclosing cognizable offences cannot be quashed merely because the accused holds an official position, and directed that the investigation must proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR quashing cognizable offence premature quashing official position

Ayyub Ali v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 568

The Supreme Court held that charges for murder under Section 302 IPC must be framed when the evidence discloses a prima facie case, setting aside the trial court's framing of charges only under Section 304 IPC in an honour killing case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC prima facie case

ANKIT MISHRA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 501

The Supreme Court upheld anticipatory bail granted to a habitual offender for non-heinous offences triable by Judicial Magistrate, emphasizing careful judicial discretion and conditions for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail habitual offender cancellation of bail Section 438 CrPC

Subhash Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi

17 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 499
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of a father for shooting his son, ruling that absence of motive does not preclude conviction when circumstantial evidence forms a complete chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence motive gunshot residue firearm injury

Sheela Devi & Anr v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd & Anr

17 Apr 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 516

The Supreme Court held that the statutory penalty for delayed compensation under Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees' Compensation Act is payable solely by the employer, modified the penalty to 30% of the compensation amount, and upheld the insurer's liability for compensation and interest but not the penalty.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(b) statutory penalty employer liability

DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE v. RAJ KUMAR ARORA & ORS

17 Apr 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 498

The Supreme Court held that dealing with psychotropic substances listed in the NDPS Act Schedule constitutes an offence under Section 8(c) regardless of their inclusion in Schedule I of the NDPS Rules, applying the ruling in Sanjeev V. Deshpande retrospectively and disallowing charge alteration under Section 216 CrPC after framing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Buprenorphine Hydrochloride psychotropic substances Schedule I NDPS Rules

Ajay Raj Shetty v. Director and Anr.

17 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 500

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the Appellant as Principal Employer under the Employees’ State Insurance Act for failure to deposit deducted employee contributions, affirming criminal liability despite the Company’s sick status.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 85(a) Principal Employer General Manager

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shamsher Singh

17 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 503
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder by holding that firing a firearm causing grievous injuries with knowledge of its lethality satisfies the requisite intention or knowledge to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Intention to cause death Grievous hurt

Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. The State of Maharashra & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 489
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld MHADA's jurisdiction to redevelop freehold land jointly with residents and societies, dismissing the appellants' writ petition challenging the e-tender based on unregistered agreements.

property appeal_dismissed Significant MHADA Development Control and Promotion Regulations 2034 freehold land redevelopment unregistered agreements

K. Shikha Barman v. State of Madhya Pradesh

16 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 497

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of the prosecution to prove her identity as the accused named in seizure and arrest documents under the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identity of accused Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 313 CrPC burden of proof

State of Karnataka v. Nagesh

16 Apr 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 492

The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction of a public servant for accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that minor discrepancies in witness testimony do not vitiate a well-established prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 P.C. Act Section 13(1)(d) P.C. Act Section 13(2) P.C. Act

Nafees Ahmad v. Soinuddin

16 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 520

The Supreme Court held that substantial compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC is sufficient and failure to frame points for determination does not vitiate an appellate court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 41 Rule 31 CPC points for determination appellate court judgment substantial compliance

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Swati Sharma and Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 487
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding of sole negligence by the truck driver and dismissed the insurer's appeal, confirming full liability to compensate the deceased's family.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance liability contributory negligence eyewitness testimony vicarious liability

R. Baiju v. The State of Kerala

16 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 488

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a political leader as a conspirator who instigated a fatal attack, affirming that active instigation with knowledge of likely death suffices for culpable homicide under Section 304 Part II IPC read with Section 120B IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conspiracy culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 Part II IPC Section 120B IPC

R. Annamalai v. Lalitha Subanam

16 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 513

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dissolved the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142, directing a financial settlement.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India Hindu Marriage Act 1955 divorce decree

Sushila & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 505

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against husband's relatives under dowry and cruelty laws due to lack of specific allegations and the dissolution of marriage by divorce.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

State of Rajasthan v. Combined Traders

16 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 496

The Supreme Court held that the State Government lacks power to cancel declaration forms under the CST Act, rendering sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of Rajasthan Rules ultra vires and invalid.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 rule-making power declaration forms Form C