Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sunil Kumar Khushwaha v. Katragadda Satyanarayana & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 642
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a fruit seller who suffered 60% functional disability due to leg amputation in a motor accident, emphasizing realistic assessment of loss of income and related expenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant functional disability compensation permanent disability loss of income

SIDDHI SANDEEP LADDA v. CONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES AND ANOTHER

07 May 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 714

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's directions on CLAT answer key evaluation, awarding marks for logically correct answers and deleting unsuitable questions to ensure fairness in the examination process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Common Law Admission Test CLAT answer key evaluation fundamental duties

KANUBHAI GOKALBHAI BARIYA v. JAYDIPSINH GOPALSINH PAREKHIYA

07 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 641
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a grievously injured appellant by correctly assessing functional disability and loss of income, and apportioned liability between insurers based on negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation loss of income functional disability amputation

Rajumon T.M. v. Union of India & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 644
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that denial of disability pension based on a Medical Board opinion lacking reasons is arbitrary and directed grant of pension to a serviceman discharged for Schizophrenia.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension medical invalidation Schizophrenia Medical Board opinion

RAMKIRAT MUNILAL GOUD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

07 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 702

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a child rape and murder case due to flawed investigation and failure to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together extra-judicial confession forensic evidence

TATA STEEL LTD v. RAJ KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS

07 May 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 639
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 61(2) IBC must be filed within 30 days plus a maximum 15-day condonable period, and the NCLAT cannot condone delay beyond this statutory limit, setting aside the NCLAT's order condoning delay in this case.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 61 limitation condonation of delay Limitation Act, 1963

P. Nallammal v. State by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Police, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu

07 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 643
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the public servant's wife for abetment in acquiring disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that non-public servants can be liable if they intentionally aid such offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 109 IPC abetment

MOHAMMED ASARUDEEN v. UNION OF INDIA

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 746

The Supreme Court held that witness protection under Section 44(2) of UAPA and Section 17(2) of the NIA Act requires individual recorded satisfaction and adherence to natural justice, setting aside blanket protection orders that denied the accused access to witness statements.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant witness protection Section 44 UAPA Section 17 NIA Act right to fair trial

Vijay Kumar Padalia v. State of Uttarakhand

06 May 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 660

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the NGT's procedural dismissal, permitting amendment and fresh filing to ensure justice over technicalities in environmental litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Section 14 NGT Act Section 16 NGT Act procedural dismissal

Commissioner of Service Tax-III, Mumbai v. M/s. Vodafone India Limited

06 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 914

The Supreme Court upheld that services provided to foreign clients with payment in convertible foreign exchange qualify as export of services exempt from service tax under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, dismissing Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant export of services service tax Business Auxiliary Services Telecommunication Services

DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY v. KAUSHIK BABULAL SHAH

06 May 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 637
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing the release of a sealed sonography machine after acquittal, holding that indefinite sealing is unjustified under the PC & PNDT Act and CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant PC & PNDT Act Section 29 Section 30 Section 451 CrPC

Tahir V. Isani v. Madan Waman Chodankar

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1044
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser from a third party not involved in the suit is not a transferee pendente lite under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC and can raise objections in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI CPC Rule 102 transferee pendente lite execution of decree

Kumari Rekha v. Shambhu Saran Paswan

06 May 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 631

The Supreme Court allowed divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under its Article 142 powers, dissolving a 26-year marriage after prolonged separation and failed reconciliation.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India Hindu Marriage Act 1955 divorce

Gopal Govind Lakade v. State of Maharashtra

06 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 658

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order dismissing a criminal application without notice or reasons, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR principles of natural justice notice to respondents criminal application

CHHATTISGARH DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. SHWETA KABRA

06 May 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 720

The Supreme Court held that fee fixation by a committee effective from a specified academic year cannot be applied retrospectively to earlier admitted students, setting aside the High Court's order for refund of excess fees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fee fixation retrospective application refund of excess fees Fee Fixation Committee

A. Raja v. D. Kumar

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 629

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant validly belonged to the Scheduled Caste Hindu Parayan caste of Kerala and set aside the High Court's order voiding his election.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election Petition Caste Certificate

Rajendra Anant Varik v. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 633

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, compounded the offence under Section 138 NI Act after payment of cheque amount and compensation, and acquitted the accused-appellant considering the defense under the Goa Money-Lenders Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Goa Money-Lenders Act compounding offence Article 142 Constitution

ARABIAN EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 630

The Supreme Court held that acceptance of a full and final settlement under economic duress does not bar arbitration and set aside the High Court's refusal to appoint an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement accord and satisfaction economic duress discharge voucher

Saroj Salkan v. Huma Singh & Ors.

06 May 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 632
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a partition suit for lack of maintainable pleadings and binding prior decrees, holding that Order XII Rule 6 CPC authorizes dismissal on court's own motion and that amended Hindu Succession Act provisions do not apply retroactively.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Hindu Succession Act 1956 partition suit Hindu Undivided Family

Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 634

The Supreme Court held that the Trial Court rightly summoned a new accused under Section 319 CrPC based on prima-facie evidence despite untested alibi, setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning of accused abetment to suicide alibi defence