Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

LIFESTYLE EQUITIES C.V. & ANR. v. AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC.

25 Feb 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; K.V. VISWANATHAN · 2025 INSC 1190

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretionary grant of unconditional stay of execution of a large money decree in a trademark infringement suit, clarifying that deposit or security under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC is directory and exceptional cases may justify stay without it.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XLI Rule 5 CPC stay of execution money decree deposit and security

National Highways Authority of India v. M/s IRB Ahmedabad Vadodara Super Express Tollways Pvt. Ltd.

24 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 283
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the applicability of Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC but set aside certain directions in the impugned judgment based on the respondent's statement, disposing of the civil appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC Code of Civil Procedure 1908 execution proceedings erasure of judgment paragraphs

District Magistrate/Collector, Sonbhadra v. Heera Lal & Ors.

24 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 285

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the land possession dispute for fresh factual determination, emphasizing independent judicial inquiry over contradictory administrative stands.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land ownership possession dispute public road construction compensation

A. Shankar v. State of Tamil Nadu

24 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 284

The Supreme Court directed continuation and consolidation of cybercrime investigations without interfering in merits, while reminding the petitioner to comply with prior court orders.

criminal petition_dismissed Cyber Crime Investigation Section 509 IPC Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. BALVEER SINGH

24 Feb 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 261

The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife, holding that the competent and reliable testimony of a child witness and corroborative circumstantial evidence suffice to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite delay in recording the statement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness testimony competency of witness tutored testimony circumstantial evidence

MD. BANI ALAM MAZID @ DHAN v. STATE OF ASSAM

24 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 260

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to incomplete and inconsistent circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstances and the inadmissibility of extrajudicial confessions made in police presence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together extrajudicial confession Section 27 Evidence Act

Surinder Dogra v. State through Director CBI

21 Feb 2025 · Ashok Koul; Kewal Krishan; Romesh Malhotra; J. Chandera Hass... · 2025 INSC 258

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a Traffic Superintendent for forgery and cheating by tampering with airline tickets, relying on expert handwriting evidence and concurrent findings of lower courts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant forgery cheating handwriting expert Prevention of Corruption Act

Rahul Verma v. Rampat Lal Verma

21 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 296

The Supreme Court held that arbitration agreements in partnership deeds bind and can be invoked by legal heirs of deceased partners, dismissing the petition challenging the High Court's referral to arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement legal heirs partnership firm arbitration clause

State of Odisha v. Sudhansu Sekhar Jena

21 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 259

The Supreme Court held that only qualifying job contract service sufficient for pension eligibility counts towards pension under Odisha Rules, setting aside a contrary High Court order and allowing the State's appeal despite prior delays.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Job Contract Employees Pensionary Benefits Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 Work-charged Employees

State of Kerala v. Moushmi Ann Jacob

20 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 255

The Supreme Court held that the exemption from conversion fees applies only to landholdings up to 25 cents, and for land exceeding 25 cents, the conversion fee must be paid on the entire landholding without deducting the first 25 cents.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 Government Notification interpretation conversion fee exemption land reclamation fee

Sajid Khan v. L Rahmathullah & Ors.

20 Feb 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 251
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the appointing authority's recognition of equivalence between diplomas for recruitment purposes is binding unless shown to be arbitrary or illegal, and set aside the High Court and CAT orders invalidating the appellants' appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant equivalence of qualifications recruitment rules judicial restraint appointing authority discretion

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajesh Kumar @ Munnu

20 Feb 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 331

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to lack of credible evidence, unexplained FIR delay, and non-cooperation in medical examination.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC Section 452 IPC FIR delay

BANK OF BARODA v. FAROOQ ALI KHAN

20 Feb 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 253

The Supreme Court held that High Courts cannot prematurely interdict personal insolvency proceedings under the IBC before the resolution professional submits a report, emphasizing adherence to the statutory insolvency process and restrained judicial review.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 personal insolvency proceedings resolution professional judicial review

RACING PROMOTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. DR. HARISH

20 Feb 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 252

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's directions altering contractual terms between the State and a private sports promoter, affirming the legitimacy of public-private partnerships and limiting judicial interference in State policy decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public-private partnership Memorandum of Understanding sports promotion judicial review

Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

20 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 249

The Supreme Court emphasized the high professional duties of advocates-on-record, accepted apologies for misrepresentations in remission petitions, and flagged the need to reconsider guidelines for designation of senior advocates under Section 16 of the Advocates Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant advocate-on-record professional misconduct senior advocate designation Section 16 Advocates Act

Vishal Shah v. Monalisha Gupta

20 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 254
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage on grounds of irretrievable breakdown, quashed extradition proceedings against the appellant due to illegal passport impoundment, and directed payment of permanent alimony.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India passport impoundment natural justice

ZON HOTELS PVT. LTD v. GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY

19 Feb 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 297

The Supreme Court held that environmental compensation orders must comply with natural justice by providing a hearing before determination, and remanded the matter for fresh determination after hearing the appellant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant environmental compensation natural justice Show Cause Notice Coastal Regulation Zone

MAATR SPARSH AN INITIATIVE BY AVYAAN FOUNDATION v. UNION OF INDIA

19 Feb 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 302

The Supreme Court directed the Union and States to ensure provision of feeding rooms and child care facilities in public places to uphold the fundamental rights of nursing mothers and infants under the Constitution.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant breastfeeding feeding rooms child care facilities fundamental rights

Rocky v. State of Telangana & Anr.

19 Feb 2025 · Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1384
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 344, and 506 IPC, holding that disputed civil documents cannot negate prima facie criminal allegations at the quashing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings civil dispute vs criminal prosecution No Dues Certificate

Poornima Advani v. Government of NCT

18 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 262
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that refund of stamp duty paid on lost e-stamp paper is permissible and interest is payable on delayed refund, as retention without occurrence of the taxing event violates constitutional principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant refund of stamp duty lost e-stamp paper Article 265 Constitution of India interest on delayed refund