Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Bikkina Rama Rao & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Tahsildar

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh consideration of the validity of sale deeds under the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, emphasizing the need to examine all relevant provisions and documents.

property appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 Section 3(1)(a) Section 2(g) land transfer

G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board

03 May 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 623

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 is not a Court for the purposes of the Limitation Act, and thus cannot condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in appeals before him.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Commissioner jurisdiction

G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board

03 May 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act is not a Court for Limitation Act purposes and cannot condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Commissioner

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Paramjeet Singh

03 May 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a purely contractual appointment terminable without notice can be ended without violating natural justice, allowing the employer's appeal and dismissing the employee's writ petition.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment termination without notice natural justice writ petition

Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation v. Paramjeet Singh

03 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that termination of a purely contractual appointment without notice is valid and does not violate natural justice when expressly permitted by the contract.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment termination without notice natural justice principles of natural justice

The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. v. Farid Ahmad Tak

02 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of compulsory retirement orders of government employees involved in corruption allegations, remitting the cases for fresh consideration under correct legal principles governing administrative action and judicial review.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations public interest judicial review

The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. v. Farid Ahmad Tak

02 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's orders quashing compulsory retirement of government employees involved in corruption cases, emphasizing limited judicial review and the need to consider entire service records under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations public interest judicial review

TATA POWER COMPANY LTD. v. ADANI ELECTRICITY MUMBAI LTD

02 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld MERC and APTEL orders allocating standby electricity charges between Tata Power and BSES/REL, affirming MERC's exclusive tariff jurisdiction under the 1998 Act and invalidating unilateral tariff revisions by licensees.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 standby charges tariff determination Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission

TATA POWER COMPANY LTD. v. ADANI ELECTRICITY MUMBAI LTD

02 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld MERC and APTEL's decision that BSES/REL should bear 23% of standby charges payable to MSEB through TPC, affirming MERC's exclusive jurisdiction over tariff determination under the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant standby charges electricity tariff Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act 1998

Seema Sarkar v. Executive Officer

01 May 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi · 2019 INSC 612

The Supreme Court held that an ex-officio MP member of a Panchayat Samiti is entitled to participate and vote in no confidence motions, and quorum must be reckoned on total membership, invalidating removal of the Pramukh without proper quorum.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Panchayat Samiti No Confidence Motion Member of Parliament Quorum

Seema Sarkar v. Executive Officer

01 May 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that the Member of Parliament, as an ex-officio member of the Panchayat Samiti, must be counted for quorum and has voting rights in no confidence motions against the Pramukh, invalidating the removal of the appellant for lack of quorum.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Panchayat Samiti No Confidence Motion Quorum Member of Parliament

Thulasidhara & Another v. Narayanappa & Others

01 May 2019 · M. R. Shah; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by reappreciating facts and wrongly held an unregistered family partition document inadmissible, restoring the dismissal of the suit based on the nominal nature of the Sale Deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC substantial question of law concurrent findings of fact partition deed

Thulasidhara & Another v. Narayanappa & Others

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating facts in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, restored the lower courts' dismissal of the suit, and clarified principles on family settlements and Sale Deeds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Partition Deed

Maharashtra Archery Association v. Rahul Mehra

01 May 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Court-appointed Administrator cannot unilaterally amend a sports federation’s Constitution beyond approved amendments, invalidated elections conducted on such basis, and directed fresh elections under the Court-approved Constitution.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Administrator authority Constitution amendment National Sports Development Code Court-appointed Administrator

M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Luxra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

01 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot arbitrarily appoint multiple surveyors to repudiate a fire insurance claim without valid reasons and upheld the insured's claim with interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Insurance claim Surveyor appointment Section 64 UM Insurance Act Claim repudiation

M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Luxra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

01 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot arbitrarily appoint multiple surveyors to repudiate a fire insurance claim without valid reasons and upheld the insured's entitlement to compensation and interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Insurance claim Fire insurance Surveyor report Section 64 UM Insurance Act

S. Subramanian v. S. Ramasamy

01 May 2019 · M. R. Shah; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by reappreciating evidence and substituting findings of fact in a second appeal, restoring the trial and first appellate courts' dismissal of partition suits involving self-acquired versus ancestral property claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Blending of Property Joint Hindu Family

S. Subramanian v. S. Ramasamy

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by reappreciating evidence and substituting findings of fact in a second appeal concerning blending of self-acquired property into joint family property, and restored the Trial Court's dismissal of partition suits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Blending of Property Joint Family Property

Praveen Singh Ramakant Bhadauriya v. Neelam Praveen Singh Bhadauriya

01 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2019 INSC 615

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution based on an amicable settlement including financial terms and withdrawal of pending cases.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce by mutual consent Article 142 Constitution of India amicable settlement financial settlement

Praveen Singh Ramakan Bhadouriya v. Neelam Praveen Singh Bhadouriya

01 May 2019 · R. Bhanumati; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142, recording the parties' settlement including maintenance and withdrawal of all pending cases.

family appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution mutual consent divorce matrimonial settlement withdrawal of criminal cases