Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Praveen Singh Ramakant Bhadauriya v. Neelam Praveen Singh Bhadauriya

01 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 following an amicable settlement including financial terms and withdrawal of pending cases.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce by mutual consent Article 142 Constitution settlement maintenance

Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir & Anr. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

01 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing CBI investigation into alleged illegal transfer of religious Trust property, holding that such extraordinary power must be exercised only in exceptional cases with prima facie material, and that the dispute was essentially civil in nature.

civil appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Article 226 religious trust property public interest litigation

Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir & Anr. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

01 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in directing CBI investigation into alleged illegal transfer of religious trust property without prima facie evidence of criminality, emphasizing that such extraordinary powers must be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Public Interest Litigation Religious Trust property Article 226

UP Housing and Development Board v. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal

01 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that mere registration does not confer a right to allotment under housing board rules and set aside the consumer forum's direction to allot a flat without contractual basis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant registration allotment housing scheme consumer complaint

Union of India & Ors. v. S. Maadasamy and Anr.

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of amended recruitment rules equating two government posts as a policy decision within the State's exclusive domain, setting aside lower courts' quashing of such rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment rules equivalence of posts Joint Chief Inspector of Factories Principal Grade A Senior Scale

Gangaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence of a truck driver transporting poppy straw in commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, ruling that breach of license conditions attracting Section 15(c) punishment cannot be reduced to Section 26 penalties.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act poppy straw Section 15(c) Section 26

Gangaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence of the appellant for transporting commercial quantity of poppy straw in violation of the NDPS Act, rejecting the defense based on license conditions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act poppy straw Section 15(c) Section 26

Rajesh v. State of Haryana

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate's and High Court's orders summoning appellants under Section 319 CrPC based on trial evidence despite no initial charge-sheet against them.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning accused discharge charge-sheet

Rajesh v. State of Haryana

01 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the Magistrate's summons under Section 319 CrPC to appellants not initially charge-sheeted, holding that trial evidence prima facie implicating them justifies their trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning accused examination-in-chief evidence charge-sheet

Ryatar Sahakari Sakkarre Karkhane Niyamit v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax C-1 & Ors.

01 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must frame substantial questions of law under Section 260-A(3) of the Income Tax Act before hearing appeals, and failure to do so vitiates the order, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 260-A Income Tax Act substantial question of law framing of questions appeal admission procedure

Ryatar Sahakari Sakkarre Karkhane Niyamit v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax C-1 & Ors.

01 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must frame substantial questions of law under Section 260-A(3) of the Income Tax Act before hearing appeals, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication due to non-compliance.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 260-A Income Tax Act substantial question of law framing of questions appeal admission

S.K. Miglani v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K.M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 602

The Supreme Court held that a bank manager removable without government sanction is not entitled to prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., upheld framing of charges for forgery and conspiracy, but deleted premature observations of guilt at discharge stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. prosecution sanction public servant forgery

S.K. Miglani v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a bank manager removable without government sanction is not entitled to prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., and upheld framing of charges for forgery and criminal conspiracy while deleting premature observations of guilt at discharge stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. prosecution sanction public servant nationalized bank manager

Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority v. Chavva Sheela Reddy

30 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 596

The Supreme Court held that a development authority can demand escalated cost under a provisional allotment contract and allowed the appeal permitting price revision despite the original fixed price stated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fixed price contract price escalation development authority consumer dispute

Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority v. Chavva Sheela Reddy

30 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a development authority can demand escalation in flat cost under a provisional price allotment, allowing the appeal and setting aside the consumer commission's order restricting payment to the original price.

civil appeal_allowed Significant flat allotment cost escalation fixed price contract provisional price

JK JUTE MILL MAZDOOR MORCHA v. JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD.

30 Apr 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that a registered trade union qualifies as an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and can file a joint insolvency petition on behalf of its members.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant operational creditor trade union Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 operational debt

Nazir Malita & Ors v. State of West Bengal

30 Apr 2019 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court modified the appellants' conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC and reduced their sentence from fourteen to ten years, emphasizing absence of premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder quantum of sentence premeditation

Nazir Malita & Ors v. State of West Bengal

30 Apr 2019 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court modified the appellants' conviction to Section 304 Part II IPC and reduced their sentence from fourteen to ten years, holding that absence of premeditation negates murder conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 302 IPC premeditation

Rashmi Chopra v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

30 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 600

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act against appellants except Rajesh Chopra, holding the complaint was an abuse of process and the High Court erred in refusing to quash it.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of complaint

Rashmi Chopra v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

30 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act against appellants due to mala fide prosecution and lack of specific allegations, while upholding summons against Rajesh Chopra for offences under Sections 323, 504, and 506 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of complaint