Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

State of Orissa v. Dhirendra Sundar Das

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that mere recommendation without completion of the recruitment process does not confer a vested right to appointment, and that restructuring and abolition of service cadres extinguish claims under repealed rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion recruitment process vested right abolition of cadre

State of Haryana and Another v. Sandeep Singh and Others

06 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the notional conversion of Classical & Vernacular Teachers to TGT under Haryana 2012 Rules does not entitle them to promotion as Elementary School Headmasters against the TGT quota.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Classical & Vernacular Teachers Trained Graduate Teacher Haryana School Education Rules 2012 Promotion eligibility

State of Haryana and Another v. Sandeep Singh and Others

06 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that Classical & Vernacular Teachers are not members of the TGT cadre under the 2012 Rules and thus not entitled to promotion to Elementary School Headmaster posts reserved for TGTs unless duly qualified and appointed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Classical & Vernacular Teachers Trained Graduate Teacher Promotion Elementary School Headmaster

Randhir Kaur v. Balwinder Kaur

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that an unauthorized exchange of gifted school property was illegal, set aside the mutation in favor of the Principal and his heirs, and restored ownership to the educational institution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Gift Deed Mutation Exchange of property Locus standi

Rambir v. State of NCT, Delhi

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 626
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years' imprisonment in a case of death caused in a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder strangulation

Rambir v. State of NCT, Delhi

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years' imprisonment, holding the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder sudden fight

Jiten K. Ajmera v. M/s Tejas Cooperative Housing Society

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for admission of additional documents at the appellate stage under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and just adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence consumer dispute Occupancy Certificate

Jiten K. Ajmera v. M/s Tejas Cooperative Housing Society

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for admission of additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and timely disposal of consumer disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence consumer dispute Occupancy Certificate

Raja Singh v. State of U.P.

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 624

The Supreme Court held that officers appointed to the Minority Welfare Department prior to the 2001 Service Rules by selection are entitled to absorption and related benefits despite the Rules excluding such absorption.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant District Minority Welfare Officer Substantive appointment Deputation Service Rules 2001

Raja Singh v. State of U.P.

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that officers appointed prior to the 2001 Service Rules through selection are substantively appointed and entitled to absorption and benefits in the Minority Welfare Department, overruling the High Court's dismissal of their claims.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant substantive appointment deputation absorption Minority Welfare Department

Karnataka Housing Board v. K. A. Nagamani

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that revision petitions under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are not maintainable against orders passed by State Commissions in execution proceedings, as such proceedings are independent of the original consumer dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 21(b) Revision Petition Execution Proceedings

Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the father's natural guardian right to custody of his minor child, affirming the High Court's habeas corpus order directing appellants to hand over custody in the child's welfare interest.

family appeal_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody natural guardian Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the father's natural guardianship and ordered custody of the minor child be handed over to him, affirming the writ of habeas corpus as a proper remedy in cases of illegal detention of a child.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody habeas corpus natural guardian Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

161e70b3d9fdeb3d5b2ae64c65bd320137cd16b1774555f6aa8fe4351409db1f

05 May 2019

The High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC permit directing police to take over investigation and prosecution when necessary to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC inherent powers transfer of investigation police jurisdiction

Maha Lakshmi v. Gangumalla Apparavu

05 May 2019 · K. M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the decree for specific performance of a sale agreement where the purchaser was ready and willing to perform, and the seller breached the contract by failing to execute the sale deed despite repeated requests.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance sale agreement land measurement readiness and willingness

Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India v. Union of India

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Vineet Saran
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of penal provisions in the PC&PNDT Act treating clerical errors as offences, rejecting challenges that such provisions violate fundamental rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant PC&PNDT Act female foeticide sex determination clerical errors

Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha · 2019 INSC 622

The Supreme Court held that research experience in drug synthesis and testing is a desirable qualification but does not satisfy the essential manufacturing/testing experience required for appointment under recruitment advertisements, setting aside the High Court's contrary interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement essential qualification desirable qualification research and development experience

Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha · 2019 (5) SCC 1

The Supreme Court held that research experience in drug development laboratories does not substitute essential manufacturing/testing experience required by recruitment advertisements and set aside the High Court's contrary interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement essential qualification preference clause research and development experience

Shri Hanumant Dinkar Arjun v. Shri Suresh R. Andhare

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a complaint based on adverse observations in a conviction order pending appeal cannot be entertained until the appeal is decided.

criminal appeal_dismissed sub judice criminal appeal complaint adverse observations

Bikkina Rama Rao & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Tahsildar

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh consideration of the validity of sale deeds under the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, emphasizing proper application of the definition of 'Transfer' and consideration of all relevant evidence.

property appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation Section 3(1)(a) Section 2(g) land transfer