Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Lahari Sakhamuri v. Sobhan Kodali

· A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld the US Court's jurisdiction over custody of minor children born and residing in the US, dismissed the Indian custody petition for lack of jurisdiction, and emphasized the paramount importance of the children's best interest and welfare in cross-border custody disputes.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 jurisdiction best interest of the child

6d451999222dd9ab3f12fd5b973c852b2c4dc238cf6fef70f381471550fadfc1

· 2019 INSC 326

The court held that mere breach of contract does not constitute deception under the Indian Contract Act, 1972, requiring proof of intentional misrepresentation and fraudulent intent for criminal liability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant deception Indian Contract Act 1972 intentional misrepresentation mens rea

Kalabai v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 590

The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, reducing the sentence to five years' rigorous imprisonment based on the dying declaration and absence of intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC intention to cause death

Kalabai v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, reducing the sentence based on the absence of intention to cause death despite the fatal act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC culpable homicide

Sampada Yogesh Waghdhare v. State of Maharashtra

· Ashok Bhushan; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of a Municipal Councillor under Section 44(1)(e) for unauthorized constructions by her spouse, affirming that such disqualification is independent of criminal liability and applies even to temporary structures.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Section 44(1)(e) Maharashtra Municipal Council Act disqualification of Councillor unauthorized construction temporary construction

Hindustan Sanitaryware and Industries Ltd. & Others v. The State of Haryana

· L. NAGESWARA RAO; M.R. SHAH

The Supreme Court held that the Government's power under the Minimum Wages Act is limited to fixing minimum wage rates and cannot alter employee classifications, include unpaid trainees or security supervisors, prohibit wage component segregation, or fix training periods, striking down those parts of Haryana's notifications as ultra vires.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 5(2) definition of employee minimum wages

G. Shashikala v. G. Kalavati Bai & Ors.

· Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order permitting additional evidence without notice under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and remanded the civil appeals for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 41 Rule 27 CPC additional evidence appellate procedure notice

Ajit Kaur @ Surjit Kaur v. Darshan Singh through LRs & Ors.

· A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that possession by a female Hindu without title does not confer absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, upholding a will excluding the widow from inheritance and dismissing her claim to the disputed property.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 14(1) absolute ownership female Hindu property rights

Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation

· Ranjan Gogoi; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that documents published in the public domain cannot be excluded on grounds of official secrecy or privilege, affirming the primacy of freedom of the press and public interest in disclosure under the Right to Information Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant freedom of speech and expression freedom of the press Official Secrets Act, 1923 Right to Information Act, 2005

Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation

· Ranjan Gogoi; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 506
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that documents published in the public domain cannot be excluded on grounds of official secrecy or privilege, affirming the primacy of freedom of the press and public interest in judicial review.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant freedom of press official secrets right to information public interest

Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation

· Ranjan Gogoi; K. M. Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that documents published in the public domain cannot be excluded on grounds of official secrecy or privilege, affirming the primacy of freedom of the press and public interest under the Right to Information Act and Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Official Secrets Act, 1923 Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 123 Indian Evidence Act freedom of press

1c5f7a724f4946624f7577861c57698fd35df75b3c8779b420d395ef5173af36

· 2019 INSC 629

The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Indian Government Grants Act, 1978 and affirmed the lawful exercise of powers by the Inspector General of Government Grants, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the administrative actions under the Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Government Grants Act, 1978 Inspector General of Government Grants administrative powers judicial review

Anjana Mittal v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited

· Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran · 2019 INSC 835

The Supreme Court held that a long-serving promoted employee cannot be treated as temporary for termination, ordered reinstatement with reduced back wages due to habitual absenteeism and delay in litigation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant temporary employee termination Regulation 24 back wages

Anjana Mittal v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited

· Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that a long-serving promoted employee cannot be treated as temporary for termination under Regulation 24, ordered reinstatement with 10% back wages considering habitual absenteeism and delay in seeking remedy.

labor appeal_allowed Significant temporary employee termination Regulation 24 back wages

State of Meghalaya v. All Dimasa Students Union

· Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 721

The Supreme Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction and orders banning illegal rat-hole coal mining in Meghalaya, affirming the applicability of the MMDR Act in tribal areas and the State's authority to regulate mining and environmental restoration.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 rat-hole mining tribal areas

State of Meghalaya v. All Dimasa Students Union

· Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction and orders banning illegal rat-hole coal mining in Meghalaya, affirming the applicability of the MMDR Act in tribal areas and validating environmental restoration measures.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 rat-hole mining tribal areas

Ramesh Dasu Chauhan and Another v. State of Maharashtra

· Deepak Gupta; Surya Kant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder and robbery based on reliable circumstantial evidence and recovery of stolen items, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence identification parade Section 27 Evidence Act homicidal death

M/S Star Wire (India) Vidyut Pvt. Ltd. v. Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission

· A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging discriminatory tariff regulations for renewable energy projects and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulations Renewable Energy Control Period

M/S Star Wire (India) Vidyut Pvt. Ltd. v. Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission

· A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging discriminatory tariff regulations for renewable energy projects and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff determination Renewable energy Control period

Syed Zainul Abedeen v. Rajasthan Board of Muslim Wakf

· N. V. Ramana; Ajay Rastogi · 2019 INSC 980

The Supreme Court held that suits challenging wakf property classification under Section 6 of the Wakf Act, 1954 must be filed within one year of publication in the Official Gazette, and dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Wakf Act, 1954 Section 6 limitation Wakf Al-Allah