Supreme Court of India
14,826 judgments
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings requested before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by the pre-amended law, no claim certificates signed under duress do not bar arbitration, and courts must respect contractual procedures for appointing arbitrators.
M/s. ACHAL INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
The Supreme Court upheld the levy of turnover tax on total turnover under Section 6-B(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, rejecting the appellant's contention that tax should be levied only on taxable turnover.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by pre-amendment law, no claim certificates signed under financial duress do not extinguish disputes, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
UNION OF INDIA v. PARMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by pre-amendment law, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
UNION OF INDIA v. PARMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Supreme Court held that the Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015 does not apply to arbitrations commenced before its commencement, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures unless failure justifies independent arbitrator appointment under Section 11(6).
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 does not apply to arbitration proceedings commenced before its commencement, no claim certificates signed under economic duress do not bar arbitration, and the High Court rightly appointed independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the pre-amended Act due to failure of the appellants to follow the agreed appointment procedure.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by the pre-amended law, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration demands made before the 2015 Amendment are governed by pre-amendment law, 'no claim' certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Antique Art Exports Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that absent prima facie evidence of coercion, a full and final discharge voucher accepted without protest extinguishes arbitral disputes, and the High Court erred in appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by pre-amendment law, no claim certificates signed under duress do not bar arbitration, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by pre-amendment law, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and the High Court rightly appointed independent arbitrators due to failure to follow agreed appointment procedures.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings commenced before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by pre-amendment law, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and the High Court rightly appointed independent arbitrators due to failure of parties to follow agreed appointment procedures.
Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
The Supreme Court held that arbitration proceedings initiated before the 2015 Amendment Act are governed by the pre-amended law, no claim certificates signed under financial duress do not discharge disputes, and courts must respect agreed arbitration appointment procedures before appointing independent arbitrators.
UNION OF INDIA v. PARMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Supreme Court held that the Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015 does not apply to proceedings commenced before its commencement, no claim certificates do not bar arbitration if signed under duress, and the agreed arbitration appointment procedure must be followed before court intervention.
Lahari Sakhamuri v. Sobhan Kodali
The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction over custody of minor children who are US citizens and not ordinarily resident in India, affirming the US Court's custody orders and emphasizing the paramountcy of the child's welfare and comity of courts.
through LRs. Gurbinder Singh .... v. The State of Haryana & Others Etc. Etc. .
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired in Faridabad under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, applying a 12% per annum cumulative increase reflecting the land's locational advantage and market escalation.
Balwant Singh v. The State of Haryana
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired in Faridabad under the Land Acquisition Act, applying a 12% annual cumulative increase to reflect true market value based on location and development potential.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Vijay Kumar Alias Pappu
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 326 IPC for acid attack causing 16% burns, reduced sentence to 5 years, and directed additional victim compensation from accused and State.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Vijay Kumar Alias Pappu
The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 326 IPC for acid attack causing 16% burns, refused to restore attempt to murder charge, and directed additional victim compensation from accused and State.
PT. BATESWARI DAYAL MISHR SHIKSHA SAMITI v. Madhya Pradesh Nurses Registration Council
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of a nursing institution seeking recognition for courses for 2018-19 due to incomplete application and non-compliance with procedural and infrastructural requirements.