Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

JAINA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.

· Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that delay in informing the insurer about vehicle theft does not justify repudiation of the insurance claim if the theft was immediately reported to police and the claim is genuine.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim delay in intimation theft of vehicle Condition No. 1

Gwalior Development Authority v. Subhash Saxena & Others

· K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2022 INSC 302

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of respondent's transfer and promotion under statutory service rules, dismissing State and GDA appeals challenging his absorption and seniority.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transfer absorption promotion seniority

Gwalior Development Authority v. Subhash Saxena & Others

· K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a long-past promotion and lawful absorption of an employee transferred from SADA to GDA, dismissing challenges to his seniority and service benefits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant promotion validity transfer vs deputation seniority determination Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatagram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973

State of Karnataka & Anr. v. State of Meghalaya & Anr.

· M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 331

The Supreme Court held that States lack legislative competence to tax lotteries organized by Governments under Entry 40 of List I, invalidating State lottery tax laws and directing refunds.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant legislative competence lotteries taxation Entry 40 List I

State of Karnataka & Anr. v. State of Meghalaya & Anr.

· B.V. Nagarathna; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that States lack legislative competence to tax lotteries organized by the Union or other States, as such lotteries fall exclusively under Entry 40 of List I, rendering the Karnataka and Kerala lottery tax Acts unconstitutional.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant legislative competence lotteries taxation Entry 40 List I

Satnam Singh v. Satnam Singh

· Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi · 2022 INSC 476

The Supreme Court upheld the decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell, dismissing the appeal and directing the plaintiff to pay an additional amount before possession is handed over.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell readiness and willingness concurrent findings

Satnam Singh v. Satnam Singh

· Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell, dismissed the appeal, and directed the plaintiff to pay an additional amount to balance equities due to delay and market changes.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell readiness and willingness concurrent findings

Mohd. Firoz v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of Mohd. Firoz for the rape and murder of a child, affirming the application of the last seen theory and principles of circumstantial evidence while rejecting claims of unfair trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 313 CrPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Mohd. Firoz v. State of Madhya Pradesh

· Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of Mohd. Firoz for the rape and murder of a minor, affirming the application of the last seen theory and principles of circumstantial evidence while rejecting claims of unfair trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 313 CrPC death penalty

Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu

· N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s bail order in a serious criminal case for non-application of mind and denial of victims’ right to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant victim rights bail application Section 2(wa) CrPC Section 439 CrPC

Som Dutt & Ors. v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

· Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court upheld the theft convictions but granted the appellants probation of good conduct under the Probation of Offenders Act, releasing them on furnishing bonds and undertaking.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 379 IPC Section 34 IPC Probation of Offenders Act Section 361 Cr.P.C

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) - 2 v. M/S. Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd

· S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

An assessment order passed in the name of an amalgamating company that ceases to exist post-amalgamation is void and must be issued in the name of the amalgamated company, and such defect is not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation assessment order Income Tax Act, 1961 Companies Act, 1956

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) - 2 v. M/S. Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd

· S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an income tax assessment order issued in the name of a non-existent amalgamating company is void and must be made in the name of the amalgamated company, dismissing the revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation assessment order Income Tax Act, 1961 Companies Act, 1956

Prabha Tyagi v. Kamlesh Devi

· M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a woman who has lived in a shared household with the respondent is entitled to relief under the Domestic Violence Act even after the husband's death, and a Domestic Incident Report is not mandatory if the application is filed directly by the aggrieved person.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Domestic Incident Report Domestic relationship Shared household

Muzaffar Husain v. State of Uttar Pradesh

· Bela M. Trivedi; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld disciplinary findings of misconduct against a retired judicial officer for awarding enhanced compensation in violation of law, affirming limited judicial review over disciplinary actions and emphasizing high standards of judicial integrity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial misconduct disciplinary proceedings Land Acquisition Act enhanced compensation

Cox and Kings Limited v. SAP India Private Limited & Another

· N. V. Ramana · 2022 INSC 523

The Supreme Court referred to a larger bench the question of the validity and scope of the group of companies doctrine and the interpretation of 'claiming through or under' in arbitration law, emphasizing party autonomy and legal basis for binding non-signatories.

arbitration other Significant group of companies doctrine arbitration agreement non-signatories party autonomy

Cox and Kings Limited v. SAP India Private Limited & Another

· N. V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court referred to a larger bench the question of whether and how the 'group of companies doctrine' applies under Indian arbitration law to bind non-signatories to arbitration agreements.

arbitration other Significant group of companies doctrine arbitration agreement non-signatory party autonomy

In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ors.

Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld prohibitions on mining within protected forests and mandated eco-sensitive zones around sanctuaries to ensure sustainable environmental protection balanced with regulated economic activity.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Eco-sensitive zones Mining leases

Sunil Sikri v. Guru Harkrishan Public School

· K. M. Joseph; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that only the Managing Committee under Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, has the power to decide pay and allowances on reinstatement, and the Tribunal lacks express power to award back wages.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Rule 121 back wages reinstatement

Sunil Sikri v. Guru Harkrishan Public School

· K. M. Joseph; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi School Education Tribunal lacks power to award back wages, which is exclusively vested in the Managing Committee under Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and dismissed the appeal challenging this scheme.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 Rule 121 back wages