Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Kishundeo Rout v. Govind Rao

08 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 956
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that adverse possession must be pleaded and proved at trial and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, dismissing the petition challenging the High Court's reversal of the appellate court's adverse possession finding.

civil petition_dismissed Significant adverse possession pleadings issue framing appellate court powers

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SUNITA DEVI

08 Aug 2025 · J. K. Vinod Chandran; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 951
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that an insurer whose policy was cancelled prior to an accident due to non-payment of premium is absolved from liability but must initially pay compensation to claimants and may recover it from the vehicle owner.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim insurance policy cancellation non-payment of premium pay and recover principle

Shyam Kali Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh

08 Aug 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 947
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence, unreliable dying declaration, and reasonable doubt arising from family disputes and medical testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder dying declaration benefit of doubt

Krishnakant Kwivedy & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others

08 Aug 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 958

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of the FIR against certain respondents, holding that specific allegations prima facie disclosing offences must proceed to trial and factual disputes cannot be decided at the quashing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 prima facie offence

XXX v. The Union of India & Others

07 Aug 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 943
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the In-House Procedure cannot constitutionally empower the Chief Justice of India or a Committee to recommend removal of a High Court Judge, affirming that removal must strictly follow the constitutional and statutory process under Articles 124, 217, 218, and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant In-House Procedure Removal of Judges Article 124 Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

EDCONS(MKS) CASTINGS PVT.LTD. v. WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

07 Aug 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ATUL S. CHANDURKAR · 2025 INSC 1006

The Supreme Court held that the West Bengal State Electricity Board could not arbitrarily withdraw a 25% concessional power tariff granted under a binding agreement to a 'New Industry' after the appellant complied with all conditions, thereby restoring the concession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant concession new industry power supply tariff legitimate expectation

Kamalkishor Shrigopal Taparia v. India Ener-Gen Private Limited & Anr.

06 Aug 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 223
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a non-executive director who neither signed nor was responsible for the company's financial affairs cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, quashing criminal proceedings against him.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability non-executive director liability

Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan

06 Aug 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 935
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's suspension of sentence and bail in a POCSO Act rape case, holding that bail under Section 389 CrPC requires prima facie satisfaction of fair chance of acquittal based on palpable defects, which was absent here.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 389 CrPC Suspension of sentence POCSO Act Sexual assault of minor

Kavita Devi v. Sunil Kumar

06 Aug 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 938
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including allowances in deceased's income, applying future prospects and multiplier as per established precedents, and awarding just compensation under all relevant heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation loss of dependency future prospects

Lokesh B v. Suryanarayana Raju & Anr.

06 Aug 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 939
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that self-employed motor accident claimants are entitled to future prospects and disability must be assessed based on credible medical evidence, enhancing compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects self-employed claimant disability assessment

Aasif @ Pasha v. The State of U.P. & Ors.

06 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 944
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh consideration of suspension of sentence pending appeal in a fixed-term conviction under POCSO and related offences, emphasizing liberal grant of suspension unless exceptional circumstances exist.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 CrPC fixed term sentence POCSO Act

Shail Kumari v. State of Chhattisgarh

06 Aug 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 936

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable sole witness testimony and absence of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, emphasizing that conviction cannot rest on conjectures.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence single witness testimony Section 302 IPC conviction

JHARKHAND v. NILU GANJHU

06 Aug 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 942

The Supreme Court reinstated convictions for arson and murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive, while upholding acquittal on alibi grounds for one accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness identification explosion fire alibi

Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana

06 Aug 2025 · Manoj Misra; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 987

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence, discrediting extra-judicial confessions and recoveries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession murder Section 302 IPC

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

06 Aug 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 937

The Supreme Court clarified the legal framework governing creation and liquidation of regulatory assets by Electricity Regulatory Commissions, emphasizing statutory duties, time-bound recovery, and balancing consumer and utility interests.

administrative other Significant Regulatory asset Electricity Act, 2003 Tariff determination Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

06 Aug 2025 · B.R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 996
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court permitted clay paver blocks to arrest soil erosion in Matheran, banned hand pulled carts as forced labour under Article 23, and directed the State to rehabilitate affected persons via e-rickshaw allotment schemes.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Eco Sensitive Zone Matheran clay paver blocks soil erosion

Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 926

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC and dissolved the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142, enforcing the settlement terms including transfer of property and maintenance payments.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC quashing of criminal proceedings divorce by mutual consent Article 142 Constitution

Sincere Securities Private Limited & Ors. v. Chandrakant Khemka & Ors.

05 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 931

The Supreme Court held that the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom to release possession of property during CIRP prevails over a suspended director's objections under Section 14(1)(d) of the IBC.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Committee of Creditors Section 14(1)(d) IBC

OPERATION ASHA v. SHELLY BATRA

05 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan

The Supreme Court held that a registered society engaged in charitable activities can be treated as a constructive trust under Section 92 CPC, allowing representative suits for breach of trust, and upheld the grant of leave to institute such a suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 92 CPC constructive trust registered society public charitable trust

Harish Kumar v. Amar Nath

05 Aug 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 924
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and dismissing the suit for specific performance due to failure of the respondents to prove a valid agreement and readiness to perform, while directing repayment of admitted debt by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement of sale fraud and misrepresentation burden of proof