Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Aug 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 927

The Supreme Court held that a confessional FIR is inadmissible against the accused, expert medical evidence alone is insufficient for conviction, and acquitted the appellant due to lack of credible evidence and misapplication of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confessional FIR admissibility of evidence Section 25 Indian Evidence Act medical expert evidence

Kallu Nat alias Mayank Kumar Nagar v. State of U.P. and Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 930
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that cognizance of an offence triable exclusively by the Sessions Court can only be taken once, and the Sessions Court cannot summon an accused under Section 193 CrPC after the Magistrate has taken cognizance and committed the case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Cognizance Section 193 CrPC Section 319 CrPC Sessions Court

Deepak Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Aug 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 929
Cites 0 · Cited by 15

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape of a minor, affirming that the sole credible testimony of the victim suffices for conviction despite absence of conclusive medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration medical evidence

Nadeem Ahamed v. State of West Bengal

05 Aug 2025 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 993

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused-appellant in an NDPS case due to lack of evidence of conspiracy, improper clubbing of narcotic quantities, and procedural lapses in seizure and sampling, while also condoning delay in filing appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 21(c) Section 29 Section 52A

The Managing Director Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited & Anr. v. Sanjay Kumar

05 Aug 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 933

The Supreme Court held that disputes involving allegations of fraud concurrent with criminal proceedings are arbitrable and limited the court's role under Section 11(6) to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence, leaving substantive issues to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitrability serious fraud Section 11 Arbitration Act Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act

Apeejay School v. Dhriti Duggal & Anr

05 Aug 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 925

The Supreme Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to entertain suits for recovery of reasonable fee hikes by unaided private schools despite the existence of a regulatory committee and ouster provisions under the Haryana School Education Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fee hike unaided private schools civil court jurisdiction ouster clause

VANASHAKTI v. UNION OF INDIA

05 Aug 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 961
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the 2025 MoEF&CC notification clarifying environmental clearance procedures for building projects, quashing the exemption for educational and industrial buildings as arbitrary, affirming SEIAA's competence under the Environment Protection Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Environmental clearance General Conditions State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

Odisha State Financial Corporation v. Vigyan Chemical Industries

05 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 928

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s dismissal of the writ petition challenging interest computation and execution proceedings, clarifying the limited binding nature of prior judgments and the conditions under which bank guarantees stop interest accrual.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India State Financial Corporation Act 1951 Order XXIV CPC bank guarantee

Delhi Pollution Control Committee v. Lodhi Property Co. Ltd.

04 Aug 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 923

The Supreme Court held that Pollution Control Boards can impose and collect compensatory environmental damages and require bank guarantees under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts, distinct from punitive penalties imposed by courts.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Pollution Control Boards Section 33A Water Act Section 31A Air Act Environmental damages

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Green Infra Corporate Wind Private Limited

04 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 922

The Supreme Court upheld the right of wind energy projects not availing accelerated depreciation to seek separate tariff determination despite PPAs fixing tariff for projects availing such benefit, emphasizing the statutory regulatory framework over contractual terms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Income Tax Act, 1961 accelerated depreciation tariff determination

Bhanei Prasad @ Raju v. State of Himachal Pradesh

04 Aug 2025 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 934

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for aggravated sexual assault on his minor daughter under the POCSO Act, denied bail, and directed compensation to the victim, emphasizing the sanctity of child protection and the severity of familial sexual offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault child victim testimony statutory presumption of guilt

CH. JOSEPH v. THE TELANGANA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

01 Aug 2025 · ARAVIND KUMAR; J.K. MAHESHWARI · 2025 INSC 920

The Supreme Court held that a binding industrial settlement entitles a colour blind driver to alternate employment and set aside his medical retirement for failure to explore suitable redeployment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant colour blindness alternate employment industrial settlement Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995

SURESH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

01 Aug 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 918

The Supreme Court held that in presence of conflicting evidence, statutory public records and medical opinion must prevail over school certificates based on oral statements in determining juvenility, and set aside the juvenile status of the accused in a murder case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenility determination Juvenile Justice Act school transfer certificate medical age report

Wakia Afrin v. M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd.

01 Aug 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 919
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act imposes statutory no-fault liability on owners and insurers for compensation even for owner-driver deaths, overruling prior views limiting claims to third parties, but deferred final authoritative pronouncement to a larger bench.

civil other Significant Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act no-fault liability owner-driver claim insurance policy limits

RANJEET BABURAO NIMBALKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

01 Aug 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1460
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld the Chief Justice's statutory power under Section 51(3) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 to appoint Kolhapur as an additional place of sitting of the Bombay High Court, dismissing challenges based on consultation, arbitrariness, and access to justice.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 51(3) States Reorganisation Act High Court additional place of sitting Chief Justice administrative power Article 14 arbitrariness

Urmila Devi & Others v. Balram & Another

31 Jul 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 915

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings alleging forgery and cheating, holding them to be an abuse of process and a disguised civil dispute, thereby exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal complaint abuse of process of law forgery

S. N. VIJAYALAKSHMI & ORS. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

31 Jul 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 917
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against appellants for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust in a property dispute, holding that the essential ingredients of the offences were absent and the matter was essentially civil in nature.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust cheating Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney

Manchu Mohan Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Another

31 Jul 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 916
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants for peaceful rally during Model Code of Conduct, holding no prima facie offence was made out under relevant IPC and Police Act provisions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR public nuisance freedom of speech and expression

Basheera Khanum v. The City Municipal Council and Another

31 Jul 2025 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 955
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that certified municipal documents are admissible evidence and restored the trial court's decree recognizing the appellant as the bona fide purchaser of plot No. 394, setting aside the High Court's reversal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction sale municipal council certified copies Section 376 Karnataka Municipalities Act

The State of Andhra Pradesh v. N. Sanjay

31 Jul 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 973

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted to a senior police officer accused of corruption, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and equal application of law irrespective of official rank.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail custodial interrogation corruption public servant