Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. v. Vinod

19 Aug 2025 · M. M. Sundresh; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 1004
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's uniform compensation award for land used in power transmission projects under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, emphasizing locality-specific valuation and highlighting procedural gaps requiring legislative reform.

property appeal_allowed Significant Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 compensation right of user transmission lines

Mahesh Chand v. Brijesh Kumar & Ors.

19 Aug 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1005
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent declaration of land as non-agricultural under Section 143 of the UPZALR Act during pendency of litigation confers Civil Court jurisdiction despite absence of such declaration at suit filing, allowing the landlord's eviction suit to proceed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant UPZALR Act Section 143 declaration Civil Court jurisdiction non-agricultural land

Nabha Power Limited v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

19 Aug 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1002
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that deemed export benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy do not apply to immovable coal-based power plants and that DGFT notifications withdrawing such benefits do not constitute "Change in Law" under the Power Purchase Agreement, dismissing the appellants' claims for compensation.

contractual / administrative / energy sector appeal_dismissed Significant Deemed export benefits Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 Change in Law Power Purchase Agreement

M/S SHAH NANJI NAGSI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

19 Aug 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1032

The Supreme Court held that procedural errors in shipping bills corrected under Section 149 of the Customs Act cannot defeat substantive entitlement to MEIS benefits and quashed the arbitrary rejection of the claim.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Merchandise Exports from India Scheme MEIS Foreign Trade Policy Section 149 Customs Act

DHARAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

19 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 998
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that long-term daily-wage employees performing perennial public duties are entitled to regularization and sanctioned posts, and arbitrary refusals citing financial constraints are subject to judicial scrutiny.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization daily-wage employment perennial work arbitrariness

K. Prabhakar Hegde v. Bank of Baroda

19 Aug 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 997
Cites 2 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a bank officer, ruling that non-furnishing of a preliminary inquiry report does not vitiate disciplinary proceedings if not relied upon, and that mandatory questioning under Regulation 6(17) requires substantial compliance without demonstrated prejudice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant preliminary inquiry report Regulation 6(17) of 1981 Regulations natural justice disciplinary proceedings

Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

18 Aug 2025 · B. R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 990

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of FIRs for abetment to suicide, holding that continuous harassment without a proximate act and clear mens rea is insufficient to sustain a charge under Section 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment to suicide Section 306 IPC mens rea proximate incident

Saraswatabai Motiram Tayade v. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation

18 Aug 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1022

The Supreme Court restored the higher multiplier of 15 for compensation of orange trees in land acquisition, emphasizing consistent treatment of similarly situated landowners and rejecting the High Court's reduction to 10.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition multiplier compensation orange trees

BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. v. ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. & ETC

18 Aug 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1073

The Supreme Court held that a unilateral appointment clause empowering a managing director to nominate a sole arbitrator is invalid due to justifiable doubts about impartiality and the managing director's ineligibility, and directed appointment by an independent institution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement unilateral appointment independence and impartiality Section 12(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act

M.V. LEELAVATHI v. DR. C. R. SWAMY

18 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 994

The Supreme Court upheld the divorce decree on mental cruelty and enhanced permanent alimony from Rs.15 lakhs to Rs.50 lakhs as a one-time settlement considering the parties' financial capacities.

family appeal_allowed Significant permanent alimony Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 mental cruelty divorce decree

Sanjit Singh Salwan & Ors. v. Sardar Inderjit Singh Salwan & Ors.

14 Aug 2025 · Augustine George Masih; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 988

The Supreme Court held that parties who accept an arbitral award and consent decree are estopped from later challenging its validity on non-arbitrability grounds, allowing execution proceedings to be revived.

civil appeal_allowed Significant estoppel by conduct doctrine of election Section 92 CPC arbitral award

Ajmera Shyam v. Kova Laxmi

14 Aug 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 992
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the election of a candidate despite non-disclosure of income in the affidavit, holding that such omission was not substantial or corrupt practice warranting voiding the election under the Representation of People Act, 1951.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Representation of People Act, 1951 Form 26 Affidavit non-disclosure of income corrupt practice

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited & Another v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra

14 Aug 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 981
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal and granted interim injunction against the respondent's use of the deceptively similar trademark 'LONDON PRIDE', reaffirming the test of overall similarity and protection of well-known marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off deceptive similarity anti-dissection rule

A. RANJITHKUMAR v. E. KAVITHA

14 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 978

The Supreme Court dissolved a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142, setting aside the High Court's order and awarding permanent alimony to the wife and son.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India divorce cruelty

M/s. SETHIA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. MAFATLAL MANGILAL KOTHARI AND ORS.

14 Aug 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 985

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's condonation of a 5,250-day delay in restoring a dismissed appeal, emphasizing the need to consider third-party rights and hear all affected parties before restoration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant restoration of appeal condonation of delay non-prosecution dismissal third-party rights

State of Karnataka v. Sri Darshan

14 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 979
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a serious murder and kidnapping case, emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of discretion considering prima facie evidence and societal interest.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation of bail medical bail Article 22(1) Constitution of India

MINI v. CBI/SPE COCHIN

13 Aug 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 980
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused of corruption charges due to lack of cogent evidence proving demand of bribe and accepted his plausible defense under Section 313 CrPC, granting him benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 313 CrPC demand of bribe hostile witness

Seventh Day Adventist Senior Secondary School v. Ismat Ahmed and Others

13 Aug 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 984

The Supreme Court held that mandatory deposit of admitted rent and filing of application under the WBPT Act within thirty days is essential and delay cannot be condoned under the Limitation Act, dismissing the tenant's appeal against eviction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 Section 7(1) and 7(2) Limitation Act, 1963 condonation of delay

Ashok Dhankad v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 974
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a serious offence accused, emphasizing the need for courts to consider gravity of crime and possibility of witness tampering before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC personal liberty prima facie case

Kamal Gupta v. M/S L.R. Builders Pvt. Ltd.

13 Aug 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 975
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that non-signatories have no right to intervene or remain present in arbitration proceedings and that courts lose jurisdiction after appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration non-signatory Section 11(6) Arbitration Act functus officio