Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Phool Singh v. Randheer Singh

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1492
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that non-impleadment of legal heirs of a deceased respondent causes abatement only against that respondent and not the entire civil revision petition, allowing belated impleadment to ensure proper adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil revision petition abatement legal heirs impleadment

Srinibas Goradia v. Arvind Kumar Sahu & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1467

The Supreme Court held that the dominant nature of an employee's duties, not designation, determines 'workman' status under the Industrial Disputes Act, reinstating the cashier terminated illegally without supervisory authority.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(s) Section 25-F

Obalappa v. Pawan Kumar Bhihani

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1450

The Supreme Court held that the respondents failed to establish title and proper identification of the property, invalidated the rectification deed and unproved survey, and restored the trial court's dismissal of the suit for permanent injunction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent injunction property identification rectification deed survey evidence

Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited v. M/s Tecpro Systems Limited

17 Dec 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1447

The Supreme Court held that the referral court must only prima facie satisfy itself about the existence of an arbitration agreement and that detailed jurisdictional issues, including whether an individual consortium member can invoke arbitration, are to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act consortium member capacity to invoke arbitration

K. S. Dinachandran v. Shyla Joseph & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1451
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the will excluding one child was duly proved and valid, setting aside lower courts' judgments and dismissing the partition suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant will execution attesting witness Indian Succession Act Indian Evidence Act

R. Ashoka v. State of Karnataka

16 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1441
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against a public servant due to absence of sanction, mala fide prosecution, and abuse of process in land allotment irregularity allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC sanction for prosecution mala fide prosecution

Maram Nirmala & Anr v. The State of Telangana & Anr

16 Dec 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1496
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against in-laws in a dowry harassment case due to vague allegations lacking specific involvement, emphasizing judicial caution to prevent misuse of Section 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings

Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay v. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

16 Dec 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1445
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the appellant is entitled to pay scale parity from the date of appointment based on binding Patna High Court precedent deemed applicable to Jharkhand under the Bihar Reorganisation Act, rejecting delay and laches defenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale anomaly parity in pay scale Bihar Reorganisation Act 2000 Section 34

Chandrashekar C v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.

16 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the purchaser-appellant in a land fraud case where the complainant admitted execution of sale documents and police found no forgery.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of complaint sale deed rectification deed forgery allegation

NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S L. DOULO BUILDERS AND SUPPLIERS CO. PVT. LTD.

16 Dec 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 1446

The Supreme Court held that the SARFAESI Act could not be invoked in Nagaland against a borrower without a valid security interest, upholding constitutional protections under Article 371A and dismissing the Corporation's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act, 2002 Article 371A Constitution of India secured creditor security interest

CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA v. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

16 Dec 2025 · J.K. MAHESHWARI; VIJAY BISHNOI · 2025 INSC 1444
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in fire insurance claims, the insurer must indemnify loss caused by fire regardless of an excluded peril triggering the fire, unless the insured is implicated in fraud or wilful misconduct.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fire insurance proximate cause exclusion clause burglary

Vinod Kumar Pandey v. The State of Jharkhand

16 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1504
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the prosecution sanction under the UAP Act granted without fresh material after two earlier rejections, holding that sanction validity must be judicially examined at the earliest stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prosecution sanction Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 45 UAP Act validity of sanction

State of U.P. v. Ajmal Beg

15 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1435
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the conviction for dowry death and cruelty, emphasizing the application of statutory presumptions and rejecting the High Court's acquittal based on misreading of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Neeru Devi

15 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1430
Cites 0 · Cited by 44

The Supreme Court reduced an excessive motor accident compensation award by halving the income computation of the deceased, emphasizing credible evidence and fair compensation principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of dependency computation of income income tax returns

Director of Income Tax (IT)-I, Mumbai v. M/s. American Express Bank Ltd.

15 Dec 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1431
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Section 44C of the Income Tax Act applies to all head office expenditure incurred outside India by non-resident assessees, including exclusive expenses for Indian branches, and such deductions are subject to the statutory ceiling prescribed therein.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 44C Income Tax Act head office expenditure exclusive expenditure common expenditure

Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat

15 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1433
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a child sexual assault case due to failure of the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence, highlighting critical omissions and investigative lapses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together sexual assault POCSO Act

Moideenkutty v. Abraham George

15 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1428

The Supreme Court held that suppression of an equitable mortgage by the vendor constituted fraud, restored the trial Court's decree for refund of advance with interest, and rejected the High Court's remand for set-off determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement for sale equitable mortgage suppression of material facts fraudulent concealment

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Milkiyat Singh

15 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1427

The Supreme Court held that a cooperative society's status as multi-State under Section 103 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 depends on its objects extending beyond one State, not merely on state reorganization or area of operation, and set aside the High Court's contrary ruling.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 Section 103 State reorganization Cooperative society objects

Nayan Bhowmick v. Aparna Chakraborty

15 Dec 2025 · Manmohan; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1436

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dissolved the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142, emphasizing that prolonged separation and refusal to reconcile amount to cruelty justifying divorce.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 desertion irretrievable breakdown Article 142

Devendra Kumar Tripathi & Ors. v. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

15 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1429
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim involving the death of a minor by applying minimum wages as notional income with a multiplier of 15 and recognized additional heads of damages including pain and suffering and loss of consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency minimum wages