Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Denash v. State of Tamil Nadu

27 Oct 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1258

The Supreme Court held that Special Courts under the NDPS Act retain jurisdiction to grant interim release of seized vehicles to bona fide owners despite the Rules of 2022, ensuring procedural fairness and protecting innocent owners from unjust confiscation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act interim custody seized vehicle confiscation

V.M. Saudagar v. The Divisional Commercial Manager, Central Railway & Anr.

27 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1257

The Supreme Court restored the CAT order reinstating a dismissed railway employee, holding that the departmental enquiry was vitiated by non-examination of key witnesses and perverse findings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry natural justice illegal gratification Central Administrative Tribunal

Novenco Building and Industry A/S v. Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Private Ltd. & Anr.

27 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1256

The Supreme Court held that suits alleging continuing intellectual property infringement accompanied by a genuine prayer for interim injunction contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, exempting them from mandatory pre-institution mediation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act pre-institution mediation urgent interim relief intellectual property infringement

Atomberg Technologies Private Ltd v. Eureka Forbes Limited

17 Oct 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1253
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court transferred the patent infringement suit from Delhi to Bombay to be tried alongside the prior suit for groundless threats, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity and conflicting judgments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant patent infringement groundless threats transfer petition jurisdiction

Kannaiya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

17 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1246

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant and co-accused of murder due to contradictory and unreliable eyewitness evidence undermining the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Eyewitness testimony Benefit of doubt Contradictory evidence

Kotresh @ Kotrappa v. State of Karnataka and Anr.

17 Oct 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1250

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and 8-year sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rejecting the appellant's plea for further reduction based on lack of premeditation and youth.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 Part-II IPC murder sentence reduction

Pride Foramer S.A. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

17 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1247

The Supreme Court held that a non-resident company undergoing a temporary lull but maintaining business correspondences is deemed to be carrying on business in India, allowing deduction of business expenses and carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant non-resident company business expenditure deduction temporary lull in business permanent establishment

Sanjay Kumar Mishra & Ors. v. District Judge, Ambedkar Nagar (U.P.)

17 Oct 2025 · B. R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN

The Supreme Court held that appointments made beyond initially advertised vacancies pursuant to a waiting list within a reasonable period are valid and quashed the termination of Class IV employees made on the ground of excess appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rule 12 waiting list Class IV appointments excess vacancies

State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anisur Rahman

17 Oct 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether allopathy and AYUSH doctors should be treated equally in service conditions, permitting interim continuance of AYUSH doctors beyond retirement age with half pay.

administrative other Significant retirement age allopathy doctors AYUSH doctors service conditions

Rajendra Bihari Lal and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

17 Oct 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1249

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of FIRs under the U.P. Conversion Act and IPC, dismissed petitions seeking their quashing, and clarified the limited scope of quashing powers post chargesheet.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 Section 4 U.P. Conversion Act multiplicity of FIRs

Leelavathi N. and Ors. v. The State of Karnataka and Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1242

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging recruitment eligibility must be adjudicated by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, not the High Court, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of tribunals in service matters and the rule of alternate remedy.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Article 226 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction alternate remedy

Legislative Council U.P. Lucknow v. Sushil Kumar

16 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1241
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's suo motu direction for CBI enquiry into recruitment irregularities, holding that such extraordinary powers require sufficient prima facie material and cannot be exercised routinely or without party prayers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Public Interest Litigation recruitment process Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council

Zoharbee & Anr. v. Imam Khan

16 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1245

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell does not transfer ownership and property not conveyed by registered sale deed at the deceased's death forms part of matruka property distributable among heirs under Mohammedan law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Matruka property Mohammedan law inheritance Transfer of Property Act Section 54

The Union of India & Ors. v. Subit Kumar Das

15 Oct 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1235

The Supreme Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no vested right to appointment after all selected candidates join and that a prior concession cannot override statutory Recruitment Rules, setting aside the High Court's direction to absorb the respondent.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant waitlist reserved panel recruitment rules concession before tribunal

Karam Singh v. Amarjit Singh

15 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 1238
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds unless ex facie barred, and allowed the appeal restoring the suit for possession and declaration of title filed within limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 11 CPC limitation mutation possession based on title

Manorma Sinha & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

15 Oct 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1237
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including allowances in income, calculating income tax deduction based on actual liability, and applying 50% future prospects for a deceased permanent employee under 40 years.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation loss of dependency allowances

Pradyumna Mukund Kokil v. Nashik Municipal Corporation

15 Oct 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1236
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored enhanced compensation for land acquisition based on statutory sale instances, denied rental compensation for pre-purchase period, but granted interest as mesne profits post-purchase, clarifying valuation and compensation principles under the 2013 Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition market value compensation rental compensation

M/S KHURANA BROTHERS v. ANAND BARDHAN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ANR.

14 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1240
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of an intra court appeal restores the original order and contempt jurisdiction lies before the High Court, not this Court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition doctrine of merger intra court appeal withdrawal of appeal

The Assam Financial Corporation Limited v. Bhabendra Nath Sarma

14 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1264

The Supreme Court held that employees of Assam Financial Corporation are entitled to gratuity at the higher ceiling notified by the State Government under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, overriding AFC's lower internal ceiling.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 gratuity ceiling Assam Financial Corporation State Government employees

Komal Prasad Shakya v. Rajendra Singh

14 Oct 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashment of criminal proceedings against accused for fraudulently obtaining a Scheduled Caste certificate, holding that a prima facie case exists and the trial must proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste certificate Forgery Cheating Criminal conspiracy