Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sithara N.S. & Ors. v. Sai Ram General Insurance Company Limited

12 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1425

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against dismissal of motor accident claims, holding that the claimants failed to prove the involvement of the offending vehicle and rash and negligent driving on the preponderance of probabilities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 motor accident claim preponderance of probabilities

Director of Town Panchayat v. M. Jayabal

12 Dec 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1423
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment is a concession, not a right, and once accepted on a post, no claim to a higher post arises later, dismissing delayed claims for promotion on compassionate grounds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment right vs concession delay and laches negative discrimination

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Vita

11 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1419
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Supreme Court overruled a two-Judge Bench and held that the Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides State Rent Control Acts retrospectively, allowing eviction of unauthorized occupants even if tenancy commenced before 1958.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Public Premises Act 1971 Rent Control Act overriding effect retrospective application

Pradeep Arora & Ors. v. Director, Health Department, Govt. of Maharashtra & Ors.

11 Dec 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1420
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that government notices under the Epidemic Diseases Act during COVID-19 constituted requisitioning of doctors’ services for insurance eligibility under PMGKY, overruling the High Court’s narrow interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 COVID-19 Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana insurance scheme

The Secretary to Government, Social Welfare And Nutritious Meal Programme Department v. P. Perumal

11 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1470
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that delay beyond the six-month limitation under Rule 36 in revising disciplinary punishment invalidates the enhanced punishment and dismissed the State's appeal to remove the employee post-superannuation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Rule 36 Tamil Nadu Civil Services Rules disciplinary proceedings delay in punishment revision six-month limitation

Shri Karshni Alloys Private Limited v. Ramakrishnan Sadasivan

10 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1411

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful forfeiture of amounts paid by the appellant in a liquidation sale under the IBC, affirming the NCLT's power to impose strict timelines and conditions to ensure expeditious resolution.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Liquidation Process Forfeiture clause NCLT powers

Dr. Sohail Malik v. Union of India & Anr.

10 Dec 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1415
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that the Internal Complaints Committee constituted at the aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction to entertain sexual harassment complaints against employees of different departments under the POSH Act, rejecting the appellant’s jurisdictional challenge.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant POSH Act Internal Complaints Committee jurisdiction sexual harassment

Mohan Lal Fatehpuria v. M/s Bharat Textiles

10 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1409
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that upon expiry of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4), the Court must substitute the arbitrator under Section 29A(6) to ensure speedy arbitration, setting aside the High Court's order that extended the original arbitrator's mandate without substitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A substitution of arbitrator mandate termination

Vineeta Srinandan v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay

10 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1408
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the sentence imposed for criminal contempt, holding that a bona fide apology expressing genuine remorse must be accepted under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal contempt contempt of court Section 12 Contempt Act apology in contempt proceedings

Saraswati Wire and Cable Industries v. Mohammad Moinuddin Khan

10 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1410

The Supreme Court held that a mere spurious or minor dispute does not bar admission of a Section 9 insolvency application and restored the NCLT order admitting the operational creditor's petition against the corporate debtor.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 9 application operational creditor pre-existing dispute

National Cooperative Development Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

10 Dec 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1414
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that deductions under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are strictly limited to profits directly derived from providing long-term finance, excluding dividend income, interest on short-term deposits, and service charges for government loans.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 36(1)(viii) Income Tax Act derived from long-term finance dividend income

The State of West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Dey

10 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1413
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that police powers under Section 102 CrPC to seize property are distinct and co-existent with attachment powers under Section 18A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, allowing freezing of accounts during investigation even in PC Act cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 102 CrPC Attachment vs Seizure Freezing of bank accounts

RattanIndia Power Limited v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited

10 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1502
Cites 0 · Cited by 33

The Supreme Court upheld the payment of Carrying Cost at LPS rate without compounding interest as per binding remand orders, emphasizing finality of appellate decisions and proper application of PPA terms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Carrying Cost Change in Law Late Payment Surcharge Electricity Act 2003

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd.

09 Dec 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1401
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that a non-signatory must prima facie establish it is a veritable party to an arbitration agreement before a referral court can direct arbitration, and dismissed BCL's arbitration claim against HPCL for lack of such prima facie evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory veritable party Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Surender Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

09 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1412
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, rejecting claims of self-defense, sudden fight, or provocation due to lack of evidence and the nature of fatal injuries inflicted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder exceptions to Section 300 IPC self-defense

Amal Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.

09 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1402
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under the SC/ST Act as an abuse of process where the criminal allegations contradicted the civil suit and did not disclose offences on the facts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 abuse of process civil dispute

Ashok Kumar Dabas v. Delhi Transport Corporation

09 Dec 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1404
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that resignation entails forfeiture of pension rights under the Pension Rules but gratuity and leave encashment are payable to the legal heirs under the Payment of Gratuity Act and service rules.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant resignation pension entitlement Central Civil Services Pension Rules 1972 Payment of Gratuity Act 1972

Suvej Singh v. Ram Naresh

09 Dec 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1405
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that correction of revenue maps under Section 30 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code is limited to rectifying errors or omissions and does not permit reopening settled land disputes, setting aside the High Court’s remand order to prevent unnecessary litigation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 30 Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code correction of revenue map res judicata remand

Sohanvir @ Sohanvir Dhama & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

08 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1397

The Supreme Court held that caste-based abuse uttered inside a private residence does not satisfy the 'public view' requirement under Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act, quashing proceedings under that provision while allowing trial on other IPC charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(s) public view caste-based abuse

Radha Thevannoor v. M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

08 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1424

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's finding of contributory negligence against the deceased driver based on credible eyewitness evidence and restored the full compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant contributory negligence eyewitness testimony road accident compensation