Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit v. Dr. Manu

01 Jan 2017 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a 2001 Government Order amending advance increment benefits for Ph.D. holders is a substantive amendment not applicable retrospectively, entitling lecturers placed in selection grade before that date to full increments under the 1999 order.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant advance increments Ph.D. qualification Government Order 1999 Government Order 2001

Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors v. State of Bihar & Ors

23 Aug 2016 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court quashed Bihar's notification granting Scheduled Tribe status to the Lohar community, reaffirming that only Parliament and the President can specify Scheduled Tribes under Article 342, and upheld prior rulings that Lohars are OBCs, not Scheduled Tribes.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe Lohar community Article 342 Article 32

Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Ors.

23 Aug 2016 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court quashed Bihar's 2016 notification granting Scheduled Tribe status to the Lohar community, reaffirming that Lohars are OBCs, not Scheduled Tribes, and awarded compensation for violation of fundamental rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe Lohar community Article 342 Article 32

Chandrabhan v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

06 Apr 2016 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a false Scheduled Tribe claim and mandated withdrawal of benefits obtained thereon under the Maharashtra Act, 2000, affirming strict adherence to the Scheduled Tribes Order.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Tribes Order Article 342 Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act 2000 false caste certificate

Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar v. Union of India

30 Nov 2015 · B.V. Nagarathna; K.M. Joseph
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that a child adopted by the widow of a deceased government servant after his death is not entitled to family pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant family pension adoption by widow Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

Lilpa Naik v. Varun Srilanvasan

06 May 2015

The Supreme Court clarified that while it has plenary powers under Article 142 to grant divorce decrees, the six-month statutory waiting period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act can only be waived in exceptional cases with judicial caution and consent of parties.

family appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act Divorce by mutual consent Six-month waiting period

Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited & Ors. v. M/S Coromandal Sacks Private Limited

25 Apr 2015 · J. B. Pardiwala; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 348
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that suits for recovery of money against sick industrial companies during BIFR proceedings are barred under Section 22(1) of the 1985 Act without BIFR consent, rendering such decrees void, and set aside the High Court’s award of 24% compound interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 22(1) Sick Industrial Companies Act BIFR sick industrial company jurisdictional bar

M/S VELLANKI FRAME WORKS v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

18 Dec 2014 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that sales effected after customs clearance by the importer are inter-State sales liable to CST, rejecting the appellant's claim of high seas sale exemption under Section 5(2) of the CST Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant high seas sale Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 5(2) CST Act importer

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955

17 Dec 2014 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 789
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, affirming Parliament's plenary power under Article 11 to confer citizenship on migrants from Bangladesh to Assam beyond constitutional cut-off dates.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 6A Citizenship Act Parliamentary competence Article 11 Citizenship Articles 6 and 7 Article 14 discrimination

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2022 INSC 185

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder burden of proof Section 302 IPC

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence and clarified that suspicion and Section 106 Evidence Act do not shift the burden of proof in criminal cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Penna Electricity Limited

25 Aug 2014 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1439
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that power supplied by a gas turbine unit prior to combined cycle COD is firm power payable with fixed charges, aligning unapproved PPAs with regulatory tariff regulations under the Electricity Act, 2003.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Commercial Operation Date Electricity Act 2003 Fixed Charges

DR. AMARAGOUDA L PATIL v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Jun 2014 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 201
Cites 0 · Cited by 33

The Supreme Court quashed the appointment of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Homeopathy for non-compliance with mandatory statutory eligibility criteria and procedural irregularities, emphasizing strict adherence to qualifications and limited but necessary judicial review.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 eligibility criteria Head of a Department judicial review

Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

10 Apr 2014 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1051

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant mother-in-law of dowry harassment charges under Section 498-A IPC due to lack of credible evidence proving cruelty or dowry demand leading to the daughter-in-law's suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC dowry harassment cruelty suicide

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Ramesh Chand v. Suresh Chand

09 Apr 2012 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, and Will do not confer title without a registered sale deed and proper proof, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession and protecting the bona fide purchaser's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 Section 53A Agreement to Sell

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mahendra Alias Golu

08 Oct 2011 · Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's acts went beyond mere preparation and constituted an attempt to commit rape under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 IPC, restoring his conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. v. M/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD.

21 Jul 2011 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1059
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the Jogighopa Act are not governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act, and in absence of prescribed limitation, appeals must be filed within reasonable time, allowing the delayed appeal filed by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 116 Jogighopa Act, 1990 Commissioner of Payments

Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan v. State of West Bengal

09 Dec 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of ganja but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and the law as it stood at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 ganja possession conscious possession