Supreme Court of India
8,449 judgments
Ashish Seth v. Sumit Mittal
The Supreme Court directed the Mittal and Seth Groups to fulfill their respective obligations under the settlement for license renewal and EDC payment, enforcing compliance through contempt proceedings if necessary.
MISS A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
The Supreme Court held that copies of victim statements under Section 164 CrPC cannot be furnished to the accused before the court takes cognizance, to protect victim safety and investigation integrity in sexual offence cases.
MISS A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
The Supreme Court held that copies of victim statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC cannot be furnished to the accused before cognizance and issuance of process, emphasizing confidentiality in sexual offence cases.
Ankita Kailash Khandelwal & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court relaxed bail conditions preventing medical postgraduate students accused in a criminal case from attending their college, upholding their fundamental right to education while safeguarding the trial process.
Satya Deo @ Bhoorey v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that juvenility is determined by the age on the date of offence under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and set aside the life sentence of a juvenile convict, remitting the case to the Juvenile Justice Board for appropriate orders.
Satya Deo @ Bhoorey v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that Satya Deo was a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 at the time of the offence, upheld his conviction but set aside the life sentence, remitting the case to the Juvenile Justice Board for appropriate orders.
Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that indefinite occupation of public roads for protests is impermissible under the Constitution, emphasizing reasonable restrictions on peaceful assembly to balance public order and citizens' rights.
Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that indefinite occupation of public roads by protestors is not permissible under the constitutional right to protest, which is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order and convenience.
Commissioner of Police v. Umesh Kumar
The Supreme Court held that candidates do not acquire a vested right to appointment merely by inclusion in a provisional selection list and upheld the lawful revision of recruitment results, setting aside the High Court's direction to appoint respondents who failed to meet revised cut-offs.
Commissioner of Police v. Umesh Kumar
The Supreme Court held that inclusion in a provisional selection list does not confer a vested right to appointment, and lawful revision of recruitment results due to errors cannot be challenged by unsuccessful candidates seeking mandamus for appointment.
T.K. David v. Kuruppampady Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the dismissal of a review petition, reaffirming that such petitions are not maintainable when the main judgment has already been finally adjudicated.
T.K. David v. Kuruppampady Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the dismissal of a review petition, reaffirming that such petitions are not maintainable when the main judgment is final and unchallenged.
M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
The Supreme Court upheld that improper service of notice before repossession of a vehicle under a hire purchase agreement constitutes deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, entitling the consumer to refund and damages.
M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
The Supreme Court upheld consumer forum orders directing a financier to refund amounts and pay damages for repossessing and selling a vehicle without proper notice under a hire purchase agreement, affirming notice as essential to avoid deficiency in service.
Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal permitting him to travel abroad despite an FIR, holding that bail conditions restricting travel must be reasonable, proportionate, and balance the accused's rights with the interests of justice.
M/S ARUN KUMAR KAMAL KUMAR & ORS. v. M/S SELECTED MARBLE HOME & ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld an arbitration award holding appellants liable for damages for use and occupation during business closure under licence agreements, rejecting challenges to the calculation of commission and reducing post-award interest rate.
M/S ARUN KUMAR KAMAL KUMAR & ORS. v. M/S SELECTED MARBLE HOME & ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld an arbitration award holding appellants liable for damages during business closure under licence agreements and reduced post-award interest rate, dismissing the appeal.
Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court held that the COVID-19 pandemic does not constitute a 'public emergency' under Section 5 of the Factories Act, invalidating Gujarat's notifications exempting factories from labour protections.
Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court held that the COVID-19 pandemic does not constitute a 'public emergency' under Section 5 of the Factories Act, invalidating Gujarat's notifications exempting factories from labour protections and upholding workers' rights to overtime wages and regulated working hours.
Pravasi Legal Cell v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the Ministry of Civil Aviation's refund framework during COVID-19, directing airlines to refund tickets booked during lockdown or issue transferable credit shells with incentives, balancing passenger rights and airline viability.