Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Pravasi Legal Cell v. Union of India

01 Oct 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed airlines to refund full fares for tickets booked and paid during COVID-19 lockdown cancellations or issue transferable credit shells valid until March 31, 2021, balancing passenger rights and airline viability amid the pandemic.

administrative petition_allowed Significant COVID-19 pandemic airfare refund credit shell Civil Aviation Requirements

Gurcharan Singh v. The State of Punjab

01 Oct 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hrishikesh Roy · 2020 INSC 570

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide due to lack of evidence of mens rea or overt acts by the accused, emphasizing that conviction cannot rest on conjecture alone.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide section 306 IPC mens rea dowry harassment

Gurcharan Singh v. The State of Punjab

01 Oct 2020 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court set aside a conviction under section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide, holding that mere suicide without direct evidence of instigation or wilful neglect by the accused cannot sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide section 306 IPC mens rea dowry harassment

Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited v. 63 Moons Technologies Limited & Others

16 Sep 2020 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 421

The Supreme Court upheld the primacy of the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving the resolution plan, validating the clause allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to appropriate recoveries from Avoidance Applications under Section 66 of the IBC, and limited judicial interference to specified grounds.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution Plan Committee of Creditors Avoidance Applications

Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar

23 Jul 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi · 2020 INSC 644

The Supreme Court quashed the order relegating a long-serving administrative officer to a different service cadre without hearing, holding it violated natural justice and exceeded the scope of prior court directions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant principles of natural justice service cadre revision Bihar Administrative Service Combined Competitive Examination

Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar

23 Jul 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court quashed the order relegating a long-serving officer from Bihar Administrative Service to Bihar Education Service, holding that such action without hearing violates natural justice and misinterprets the Court's earlier directions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice merit list revision seniority Bihar Administrative Service

Anita Sharma v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

23 Jul 2020 · Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Tribunal's award holding the car owner liable for rash driving, accepted the eyewitness testimony, and directed enhanced compensation with future prospects in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rash and negligent driving eyewitness credibility preponderance of probabilities

Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh

18 Jun 2020 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 626
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings for criminal breach of trust and cheating arising from non-payment for goods, holding that no prima facie offence was made out and emphasizing the distinct legal requirements for such offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust cheating Section 406 IPC Section 420 IPC

Rohtas & Anr. v. State of Haryana; Bijender v. State of Haryana

15 Mar 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 694
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, clarified the interplay between Sections 149 and 34 IPC regarding unlawful assembly and common intention, and rejected appellants' plea for sentence reduction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC Section 34 IPC

आयुक्त, वाणिज्य कर, लखनऊ, यूपी v. एस/एस रूझान स्टूतिडयो

11 Dec 2019 · नंजय वाईंद्रूड़

The Supreme Court held that cutting and embroidery transform cloth into taxable goods under Schedule V of the UP VAT Act, allowing the revenue's appeal and reversing the High Court's exemption order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant UP VAT Act 2008 classification of goods textile made-ups manufacture definition

Col Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Dec 2019 · Bela M. Trivedi; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that the trial by General Court Martial was barred by the three-year limitation under Section 122 of the Army Act and quashed the trial order, while allowing disciplinary proceedings to continue.

military_law appeal_allowed Significant Army Act 1950 Section 122 limitation General Court Martial disciplinary proceedings

Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam v. State of Bihar

13 Nov 2019 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against in-law appellants due to general omnibus allegations lacking specific roles, emphasizing caution against misuse of Section 498A IPC in matrimonial disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC omnibus allegations matrimonial dispute quashing of FIR

Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam v. State of Bihar

13 Nov 2019 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against in-law appellants in a matrimonial dispute due to general omnibus allegations lacking specific role attribution, emphasizing caution against misuse of Section 498A IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC omnibus allegations matrimonial dispute quashing of FIR

Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh

24 Oct 2019 · V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that reasonable restrictions on free speech under Article 19(2) are exhaustive, fundamental rights are enforceable only against the State, and Ministers’ official statements can attract State liability, while emphasizing the need for voluntary codes of conduct and legislative clarity on constitutional tort.

constitutional other Significant Article 19(2) Freedom of speech Reasonable restrictions Fundamental rights

Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (Biscuit Division) v. State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2019 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 801
Cites 0 · Cited by 39

The Supreme Court held that failure of the appropriate Government to pass a reasoned order within 60 days on an application for closure under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act results in deemed permission to close, and communications by unauthorized officers do not constitute valid orders.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-O closure of industrial establishment deemed permission

B.R.K. AATHITHAN v. SUN GROUP

30 Aug 2019 · SURYA KANT; J.K. MAHESHWARI

The Supreme Court held that a second criminal complaint under Sections 499 and 500 IPC is not maintainable after dismissal of the first complaint by a Magistrate who applied judicial mind, absent exceptional circumstances.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal complaint defamation Section 499 IPC Section 500 IPC

Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

27 Aug 2019 · S. Abdul Nazeer; B. R. Gavai; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubraman... · 2022 INSC 1280

The Supreme Court referred to a Constitution Bench the question whether, in absence of direct evidence from the complainant, guilt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act can be inferred from other evidence, emphasizing that proof of demand is essential and mere recovery of tainted notes is insufficient.

criminal other Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 20

Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)

27 Aug 2019 · S. Abdul Nazeer; B. R. Gavai; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubraman...

The Supreme Court referred to a Constitution Bench the question whether, in absence of direct evidence from the complainant, demand of illegal gratification can be proved by inferential or circumstantial evidence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

criminal other Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 20

ADANI POWER LTD. & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

28 Jun 2019 · Aravind Kumar; N.V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 1
Cites 0 · Cited by 61

The Supreme Court held that customs duty cannot be levied on electrical energy cleared from an SEZ to the DTA absent a lawful charging provision, invalidated successive notifications imposing such duty, and directed refund of amounts paid.

tax appeal_allowed Significant customs duty Special Economic Zone electrical energy delegated legislation

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another v. Sunita

24 Apr 2019 · Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that accident benefit under a life insurance policy is not payable if the policy had lapsed on the accident date and was revived only after the accident without disclosure, emphasizing strict construction and utmost good faith in insurance contracts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant life insurance policy accident benefit policy lapse revival of policy