Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India

05 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 6

The Supreme Court held that a sole arbitrator appointed unilaterally by an ineligible party under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act is void ab initio, and such ineligibility can only be waived by an express written agreement post-dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 12(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act ineligibility of arbitrator unilateral appointment express waiver in writing

M/s Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. State of Kerala

05 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 4
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that non-issuance of a Section 21 notice is procedural and does not bar the Arbitral Tribunal's jurisdiction to decide all disputes covered by a broadly worded arbitration agreement, thereby upholding the arbitral award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 21 notice jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal waiver of procedural requirements

NAK ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. TARUN KESHRICHAND SHAH

05 Jan 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 8

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order refusing to implead the appellant as a necessary or proper party in a suit for recovery of service charges, emphasizing the plaintiff's right to choose parties and the need for proof of legal succession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant necessary party proper party impleadment successor company

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited v. Santosh Cordeiro and Another

05 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 5
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that disputes between licensor and licensee involving recovery of license fees are arbitrable despite exclusive jurisdiction of Small Causes Court under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, and upheld the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitrability Section 11 Arbitration Act Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act exclusive jurisdiction

Dharmendra Sharma v. M. Arunmozhi & Anr.

05 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 10
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to refund the value of non-judicial stamp papers to the petitioner, closing contempt proceedings against the Agra Development Authority for partial compliance with earlier refund orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court refund of stamp papers non-judicial stamp papers U.P. Stamp Rules 1942

Panganti Vijaya v. United India Insurance Company Ltd.

05 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 9
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court restored a compensation award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, holding that the deceased was employed at the time of the fatal accident and rejecting the High Court’s erroneous interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship compensation fatal accident

Nirbhay Singh Suliya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 7

The Supreme Court held that mere erroneous bail orders without evidence of corrupt motive or mala fide conduct do not justify removal of a judicial officer, setting aside the appellant's removal and emphasizing protection of judicial independence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial officer misconduct disciplinary proceedings bail orders Section 59-A Madhya Pradesh Excise Act

Anjani Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

05 Jan 2026 · Manoj Misra; Joymalya Bagchi · 2026 INSC 3

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable sole eyewitness testimony and contradictory forensic evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness testimony benefit of doubt firearm injuries forensic evidence

State of U.P. & Anr v. Mohd Arshad Khan & Anr

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1480

The Supreme Court set aside High Court orders granting protection from arrest and imposing time-bound investigation, reaffirming that such directions must be justified by facts and comply with binding precedents like Neeharika Infrastructure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 protection from arrest time-bound investigation

Bhika Ram v. State of Rajasthan

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1482

The Supreme Court held that naming Revenue Villages after individuals violates a binding State Government policy circular, rendering the notification invalid and quashing the Division Bench's order that had set aside the Single Judge's quashing of the notification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Revenue Village Naming policy Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 State Government circular 2009

Rajasthan High Court & Anr. v. Rajat Yadav & Ors.

19 Dec 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1503
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Reserved category candidates scoring above the general category cut-off must be considered in the general category at all recruitment stages, ensuring equality of merit and invalidating exclusive category-wise shortlisting.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation migration meritorious reserved category candidates general category

Belide Swagath Kumar v. State of Telangana & Another

19 Dec 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1471

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act due to vague, unsubstantiated allegations amounting to abuse of process in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC

Tarachandra v. Bhawarlal & Anr.

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1485

The Supreme Court held that mutation of land records can be allowed on the basis of a registered will under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, and set aside the High Court's order interfering with mutation granted by revenue authorities.

property appeal_allowed Significant mutation will land revenue code Madhya Pradesh

Dr. Amit Arya v. Kamlesh Kumari

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1486
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that delay in filing execution beyond the prescribed period does not automatically rescind a contract if the decree-holder remains ready and willing, and restored the execution of specific performance decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance execution of decree Section 28 Specific Relief Act doctrine of merger

Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr.

19 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1476
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that judicial permissions allowing passport renewal with conditions lift the statutory bar under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, directing renewal of the appellant’s passport despite pending criminal proceedings.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Passports Act, 1967 Section 6(2)(f) GSR 570(E) passport renewal

M/S SRI OM SALES v. ABHAY KUMAR @ ABHAY PATEL

19 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1474

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act at the pre-trial stage by inquiring into disputed facts about issuance of the cheque, as the presumption under Section 139 can only be rebutted at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of complaint

Patchaiperumal @ Patchikutti & Anr. v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Anr.

19 Dec 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1478
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction of appellants for premeditated murder based on credible eyewitness, medical, and circumstantial evidence despite minor contradictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC common intention eyewitness testimony

Union of India v. Pranab Kumar Nath

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1479
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that dismissal from CISF service for contracting a second marriage while the first subsisted is justified under Rule 18(b), and the High Court erred in reducing the punishment by reappreciating evidence beyond its judicial review scope.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings CISF Rules 2001 second marriage Rule 18(b)

K.P. Kirankumar @ Kiran v. State by Peenya Police

19 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1473

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for child trafficking and sexual exploitation based on credible minor victim testimony and lawful search, emphasizing judicial sensitivity in such cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child trafficking commercial sexual exploitation minor victim testimony Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act

Lakshmanan v. State

19 Dec 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1483
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of bail and joint trial direction in serious caste-based offences, emphasizing mandatory victim hearing under Section 15A(5) SC/ST Act and strict scrutiny of bail in cases involving witness intimidation and prior bail misuse.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 15A(5) SC/ST (POA) Act victim's right to be heard joint trial