Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

KKK Hydro Power Limited v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited

29 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1057

The Supreme Court held that tariff fixation and amendments to Power Purchase Agreements require prior approval of the Electricity Regulatory Commission, dismissing the appellant's claim for enhanced tariff without such approval.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Power Purchase Agreement Tariff fixation Electricity Regulatory Commission

Amar Singh v. Union of India

29 Aug 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1055
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld disciplinary penalty against a CISF constable for unauthorized deviation from out-pass and conduct harming the Force's reputation, dismissing the appeal for lack of natural justice violation.

administrative appeal_dismissed disciplinary proceedings Central Industrial Security Force out-pass gross indiscipline

State of Punjab v. Ex. C. Satpal Singh

29 Aug 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1056
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that dismissal based on gravest misconduct does not require prior disclosure of past misconduct in the show cause notice and upheld the disciplinary authority's order dismissing the respondent for unauthorized absence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry unauthorized absence dismissal from service Punjab Police Rules 1934

Tarachand Logistic Solutions Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh

29 Aug 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1052

Motor vehicle tax under the Andhra Pradesh Act is leviable only on vehicles used or kept for use in a public place; vehicles confined within enclosed, restricted premises without public access are exempt from such tax.

tax appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle tax public place Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963 Section 3

Phireram v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1074
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 does not substitute the court's power to cancel bail for violation of bail conditions, and remanded the bail cancellation application for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation witness protection threats to witnesses conditional bail

M/S. MOTILAL AGARWALA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

28 Aug 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1062

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act begins only upon delivery of the award to the competent party, not merely to an authorised representative, and dismissed the appeal upholding the High Court's ruling that the Section 34 application was not time-barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Delivery of award

Anil Khandelwal v. Phoenix India

28 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1069

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against bank officers for defamation based on a clerical error in a SARFAESI possession notice, holding that prosecution without impleading the company and absent statutory vicarious liability under IPC is impermissible.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant vicarious liability defamation SARFAESI Act clerical error

Dogiparthi Venkata Satish and Another v. Pilla Durga Prasad and Others

26 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1046

The Supreme Court held that suing the proprietor representing a proprietorship concern is sufficient and does not vitiate the cause of action, allowing the eviction suit to proceed despite substitution of parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant proprietorship concern Order XXX Rule 10 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action

Putai v. State of Uttar Pradesh

26 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1042
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted accused in a brutal child rape and murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting procedural lapses in forensic evidence and investigation.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant circumstantial evidence DNA evidence chain of custody forensic samples

EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LIMITED v. REGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER II AND RECOVERY OFFICER

26 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1045

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order and remanded the writ petition for fresh adjudication on the priority of EPFO dues vis-à-vis secured creditors under SARFAESI Act after impleading all relevant parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act Section 11(2) SARFAESI Act Section 35

Khajnekar v. The State of Goa

26 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1041
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that a minor, unintentional act does not constitute 'child abuse' under the Goa Children’s Act and granted the appellant probation, acquitting him of serious charges while confirming minor assault convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child abuse Goa Children’s Act, 2003 Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 8(2) Goa Children’s Act

Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. State of U.P. & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1039

The Supreme Court directed High Courts to ensure timely pronouncement of judgments, reiterating that undue delay violates the principle of speedy justice and undermines public confidence in the judiciary.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in judgment pronouncement speedy justice High Court procedures judicial accountability

Glencore International AG v. M/s. Shree Ganesh Metals

25 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 1036

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration agreement can be binding despite one party not signing the contract if conduct and communications demonstrate acceptance, and directed reference to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 45 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 contract acceptance unsigned contract

Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India

25 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1043

The Supreme Court held that it can reopen a final death sentence under Article 32 to ensure compliance with procedural safeguards mandated in Manoj (2022), setting aside the sentence and remitting for fresh sentencing with comprehensive mitigation material.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 32 Constitution of India death penalty capital punishment Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Company Ltd. v. Saisudhir Energy (Chitradurga) Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 1034

The Supreme Court held that failure to comply with contractual procedures for extension or Force Majeure precludes relief, validating lawful invocation of performance bank guarantee and limiting regulatory authority to alter contract terms.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Performance Bank Guarantee Force Majeure Conditions Precedent

SRI R RAGHU v. SRI G M KRISHNA

25 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 1040

The Supreme Court upheld a court auction sale of agricultural land despite allegations of misrepresentation and statutory prohibitions, directing additional payment and boundary survey while dismissing all appeals and contempt proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant auction sale Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 retrospective repeal Order XXI CPC

Chowdamma v. Venkatappa

25 Aug 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1038
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree of partition, holding that oral evidence under Section 50 of the Evidence Act and adverse inference from defendant's silence established the plaintiffs' mother's valid marriage to the deceased, entitling them to their share in ancestral property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant marriage presumption Section 50 Indian Evidence Act adverse inference revenue records

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

25 Aug 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1054

The Supreme Court upheld the declaration of fragmented land parcels as protected forest while allowing protection for certain pre-1996 encroachments used for public and residential purposes, subject to statutory procedures under the Forest Rights Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Forest Rights Act 2006 protected forest fragmented land parcels encroachments

Conference for Human Rights (India) (Regd.) v. Union of India

22 Aug 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1018
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court balanced public safety and animal welfare by modifying its directions to allow release of sterilized stray dogs except rabid or aggressive ones, mandating infrastructure creation and regulated feeding under the ABC Rules, 2023.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant stray dogs Animal Birth Control Rules 2023 sterilization and immunization public safety

PALM GROVES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. M/s MAGAR GIRME AND GAIKWAD ASSOCIATES

22 Aug 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 1023

The Supreme Court clarified that under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as amended, revision petitions are not maintainable against execution orders and appeals under Section 27A are the proper remedy, recognizing a statutory lacuna in enforcement provisions remedied by the 2019 Act.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Execution of orders Section 25 enforcement