Supreme Court of India

16,357 judgments

Year:

Kala Singh @ Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab

21 Sep 2021 · R. Subhash Reddy; Hrishikesh Roy · 2021 INSC 519

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 304 Part-I IPC to Section 304 Part-II IPC, recognizing absence of intention to kill in a sudden fight, and maintained the conviction under Section 201 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide Section 304 Part-I IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC Section 302 IPC

Kala Singh @ Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab

21 Sep 2021 · R. Subhash Reddy; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 304 Part-I IPC to Section 304 Part-II IPC, reducing the sentence due to absence of intention to cause death in a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 Part-I IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC culpable homicide intention to kill

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. EMTA Coal Limited

21 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, the successful allottee has discretion to adopt or reject prior contracts, and EMTA had no right of first refusal to continue mining operations, upholding PSPCL's decision to appoint a Mine Developer through competitive bidding.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 Section 11 right of first refusal legitimate expectation

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. EMTA Coal Limited

21 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, the successful allottee has discretion to adopt or reject prior contracts, and PSPCL lawfully rejected EMTA's claim to a first right of refusal, upholding the competitive bidding process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 Section 11 legitimate expectation judicial review

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Ors. v. 24 Oranges Lab LLP & Anr.

21 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a lease deed executed pursuant to an interim order fixing a provisional rate is not final and remanded the writ petition for fresh consideration on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim order lease deed market value allotment letter

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Ors. v. 24 Oranges Lab LLP & Anr.

21 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a lease deed executed pursuant to an interim order fixing a rate is not final and binding, remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant interim order lease deed allotment letter market value

Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited v. T.P. Nataraja

21 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated requests for change of date of birth in service records beyond statutory time limits and without procedural compliance are not permissible, emphasizing delay and laches as valid grounds for rejection.

labor appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction Karnataka State Servants (Determination of Age) Act, 1974 Section 5(2) delay and laches

Rajendra Bajoria v. Hemant Kumar Jalan

21 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a suit by legal heirs of deceased partners seeking dissolution and rights in a partnership firm, holding that only partners can claim such reliefs and the plaint did not disclose a cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Indian Partnership Act, 1932 partnership dissolution

Rajendra Bajoria v. Hemant Kumar Jalan

21 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a suit by non-partner legal heirs seeking dissolution and assets of a partnership firm, holding that such reliefs are not legally tenable and the plaint did not disclose a cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Indian Partnership Act 1932 partnership dissolution

SULOCHANABAI SWAROPCHAND CHAWRE v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

20 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 507

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition concerning right of access through property, remanding for detailed consideration of easement rights and directing maintenance of status quo.

property appeal_allowed Significant easement of necessity right of way property rights layout plan

SULOCHANABAI SWAROPCHAND CHAWRE v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

20 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for detailed consideration of the existence of easement rights before directing access through the appellant's property.

property appeal_allowed Significant easement of necessity right of way access road property rights

Manmohan Lal Gupta v. Market Committee Bhikhi

20 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's uniform market value determination for land acquisition, rejecting reliance on post-notification sale deeds and classification of lands for differential compensation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value determination sale deeds as exemplars preliminary notification date

Shankarrao Bhagwantrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra

20 Sep 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored compensation at Rs.70 per square feet with 50% deduction for development charges and awarded interest from possession date, rejecting non-bonafide sale exemplars relied upon by landowners.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation development charges sale exemplars

Allahabad Bank v. Krishan Pal Singh

20 Sep 2021 · R. Subhash Reddy; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that suspicion alone cannot justify dismissal and awarded monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement to a bank employee dismissed without sufficient evidence who had attained superannuation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dismissal from service reinstatement loss of confidence industrial dispute

Madan Lal & Ors. v. State of Punjab

20 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 506
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a deduction on land acquisition compensation due to the shadow of terrorism is unjustified, allowing only a development-related cut and directing payment of enhanced compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition base value market value shadow of terrorism

Madan Lal & Ors. v. State of Punjab

20 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court set aside the additional 25% deduction on land compensation for the shadow of terrorism, allowing only a development-related cut, thereby ensuring fair compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition base value yearly appreciation development cut

ULTIMATE V CARBON v. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER

20 Sep 2021 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2021 INSC 504

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal against an NGT order passed without hearing the appellant, permitting a review application despite limitation and condonation of delay.

administrative appeal_allowed National Green Tribunal natural justice notice hearing

ULTIMATE V CARBON v. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER

20 Sep 2021 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to file a civil appeal against the NGT order passed without hearing them and permitted filing of a review application with condonation of delay if necessary.

administrative appeal_allowed National Green Tribunal natural justice notice and hearing review application

M/s Laxmi Continental Construction Co. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

20 Sep 2021 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an arbitrator appointed by designation continues to act post-retirement unless the arbitration agreement provides otherwise, and setting aside an award on retirement grounds alone is unjustified.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration arbitrator retirement mandate of arbitrator clause 52 arbitration agreement

M/s Laxmi Continental Construction Co. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

20 Sep 2021 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an arbitrator appointed by designation continues to hold office and validly passes award after retirement unless the arbitration agreement provides otherwise, allowing the appeal and restoring the award set aside by the High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration arbitrator retirement mandate of arbitrator clause 52 arbitration agreement