Supreme Court of India
16,357 judgments
K.V. MOHAMMED ZAKIR v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to withdraw a tax-related civil appeal to avail the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
K.V. MOHAMMED ZAKIR v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the civil appeal to avail the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
State of U.P. v. Mithun Singh
The Supreme Court held that the criminal appeal against the sole accused abates upon his death during the pendency of the appeal.
State of U.P. v. Mithun Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated following the death of the sole accused, Mithun Singh.
Rakesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that after completion of investigation and sanction in a corruption case, arrest is not mandatory and the accused can be released on bail subject to conditions ensuring trial attendance.
Nisha v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail to the appellant in a dowry death and cruelty case, setting aside the High Court's rejection, emphasizing the totality of circumstances and conditions to prevent misuse.
Abhilasha Gupta v. Harimohan Gupta
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of divorce proceedings at an advanced stage and directed payment of transportation expenses to the petitioner.
Abhilasha Gupta v. Harimohan Gupta
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition to transfer a divorce case at an advanced stage, directing the respondent to pay transportation expenses to the petitioner for court appearances.
National Gandhi Museum v. Sudhir Sharma
The Supreme Court held that compulsory retirement without prior approval under the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal but denied reinstatement due to proven misconduct and long absence, awarding compensation instead.
National Gandhi Museum v. Sudhir Sharma
The Supreme Court held that compulsory retirement without statutory approval is illegal but denied reinstatement due to proven misconduct and awarded compensation instead.
Rajeev Nohwar v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority
The Supreme Court allowed the refund of stamp duty paid by the appellant despite delay caused by prolonged litigation, holding that statutory limitation did not bar the claim and equity justified relief under Article 142.
S. KARTHIK v. N. SUBHASH CHAND JAIN
The Supreme Court held that a secured creditor must provide a fresh 30 days' notice before auction under SARFAESI Act rules, invalidating a sale conducted on only 10 days' notice.
S. KARTHIK v. N. SUBHASH CHAND JAIN
The Supreme Court held that a sale under the SARFAESI Act without a mandatory 30-day notice is invalid, quashing the auction sale conducted on insufficient notice and affirming the borrower's right of redemption until completion of sale.
Bihari v. State of U.P.
The Supreme Court dismissed the delayed Special Leave Petition challenging enhanced land acquisition compensation, upholding the High Court's award of Rs. 28.12 per square yard.
Bihari v. State of U.P.
The Supreme Court dismissed a delayed Special Leave Petition challenging enhanced land acquisition compensation, upholding the High Court's award of Rs. 28.12 per square yard.
National Highways Authority of India v. Madhukar Kumar
The Supreme Court held that locating a toll plaza within municipal limits without recording reasons and without the highway being primarily for local residents violates Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee Rules, 2008, and set aside the impugned toll plaza location.
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & OTHERS v. MADHUKAR KUMAR & OTHERS
The Supreme Court held that locating a toll plaza within municipal limits without recorded reasons violates Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee Rules, 2008, and upheld the direction to shift the toll plaza beyond municipal limits.
D.K. Agrawal v. Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Supreme Court held that the ICAI Council must independently consider evidence and record reasoned findings in disciplinary proceedings, setting aside unreasoned orders and remitting the matter for fresh consideration.
The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa
The Supreme Court held that a representative suit under Section 92 CPC does not conclusively decide title for res judicata and that prior suits and compromise decrees did not bar the present suit seeking declaration of wakf property.
The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa
The Supreme Court held that a representative suit under Section 92 CPC conclusively deciding title to trust property operates as res judicata, barring subsequent suits by interested parties, and dismissed the appeal challenging this principle.