Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Mahendra K C v. The State of Karnataka

29 Oct 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; B V Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of an FIR under Section 306 IPC, holding that the allegations prima facie disclose an offence and the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by assessing evidence at the quashing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC

State of Kerala & Anr. v. M/s Popular Estates

29 Oct 2021 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that only about 402 acres of Popular Estates' land vested as private forest in the State of Kerala under the Vesting Act, with the remainder classified as plantation exempt from vesting.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 private forest plantation Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

State of Kerala & Anr. v. M/s Popular Estates

29 Oct 2021 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court’s finding that only about 402 acres vested as private forest in the State under the Vesting Act, while the remainder was plantation exempt from vesting, dismissing the State’s appeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 private forest plantation Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

State of Orissa & Ors. v. Premalata Mohapatra (Dead) Through Lrs.

29 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allotting land to the respondent, holding that eligibility under government policy requires verified service in forward areas during the specified period, which was not established.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant land allotment government resolution forward area service Indo-China war

State of Orissa & Ors. v. Premalata Mohapatra

29 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allotting land to the respondent, holding that the deceased did not fulfill the eligibility criteria of serving in forward areas during 1962-64 as required by government policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Government land allotment Forward area service Indo-China war Eligibility certificate

Badrilal v. Suresh

28 Oct 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Will and held that a compromise agreement without proper execution cannot revoke it, limiting the sale deed's validity to the beneficiary's share under the Will.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Revocation of Will Indian Succession Act, 1925 Sale deed

Yatin Narendra Oza v. High Court of Gujarat

28 Oct 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's withdrawal of a Senior Advocate's designation for misconduct but granted a two-year temporary restoration as a last chance for redemption.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Advocate designation withdrawal of privilege Article 32 Constitution Article 142 Constitution

Yatin Narendra Oza v. High Court of Gujarat

28 Oct 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's withdrawal of a Senior Advocate's designation for misconduct but granted a two-year conditional restoration to allow redemption under its constitutional powers.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Advocate designation withdrawal of privilege Article 32 Constitution Article 142 Constitution

Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd.

28 Oct 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court’s decision allowing rectification of Form GSTR-3B returns for the period in which errors occurred, overruling restrictions in the impugned Circular and affirming the statutory right of registered persons to self-assess and rectify GST returns despite initial technical difficulties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Form GSTR-3B input tax credit Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 self-assessment

Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. & Ors.

28 Oct 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that rectification of Form GSTR-3B returns for the relevant period is restricted by Section 39(9) of the CGST Act and a registered person must self-assess taxes based on its own records, rejecting the High Court's allowance of retrospective rectification beyond statutory provisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Form GSTR-3B Input Tax Credit Self-assessment Rectification of returns

Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari & Ors.

28 Oct 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits for permanent injunction relating to waqf properties barred under Section 85 of the Waqf Act, 1995, which vests exclusive jurisdiction in Waqf Tribunals.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Waqf Act 1995 Section 85 Waqf Act civil court jurisdiction Waqf Tribunal

Thwaha Fasal v. Union of India

28 Oct 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 688
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that bail under the UAPA requires prima facie material showing intention to further terrorist activities and that constitutional courts can grant bail despite statutory embargoes when such material is lacking.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D bail provisions terrorist organisation prima facie case

Thwaha Fasal v. Union of India

28 Oct 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that bail under the UAPA requires prima facie proof of intention to further terrorist activities and restored bail to the accused where such intention was not established on the charge sheet material.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D(5) Bail Terrorist organisation

Rajneesh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India

28 Oct 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that States must appoint qualified special teachers on a regular basis and maintain prescribed pupil-teacher ratios to ensure quality education for Children with Special Needs under the relevant laws and schemes.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Children with Special Needs Special Teachers Pupil-Teacher Ratio Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992

Gaurav Singh v. The State of Jharkhand

28 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that cheques issued as security for a loan can be presented after the debt matures, attracting Section 138 N.I. Act, while non-repayment without mens rea does not constitute cheating under Section 420 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 420 IPC cheque issued as security legally recoverable debt

Sita Ram & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

28 Oct 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court reclassified the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception fourthly to Section 300 IPC, confirmed juvenility of two accused, and reduced sentences accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Exception fourthly to Section 300 IPC juvenility Juvenile Justice Act

Sita Ram & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

28 Oct 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court reclassified the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reduced sentences accordingly, and upheld juvenility claims for two accused, allowing the appeal partly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC juvenile justice Section 304-II IPC

ANANT RAJ LTD. v. STATE OF HARYANA

27 Oct 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's cancellation of licences granted on a non-transparent First Come First Serve basis, holding such a policy arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and directed consideration of applications under a fair and transparent policy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant First Come First Serve licence grant Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Article 14

Musunuri Satyanarayana v. Dr. Tirumala Indira Devi

27 Oct 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that a cultivating tenant's tenancy subsists unless validly surrendered following statutory procedure, entitling him to the right of first purchase and invalidating unauthorized sales by the landlord.

property appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act cultivating tenant surrender of tenancy right of first purchase

Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India

27 Oct 2021 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court of India recognized the fundamental right to privacy against unauthorized surveillance and constituted an independent Expert Committee to investigate allegations of Pegasus spyware use on Indian citizens.

constitutional other Significant right to privacy Pegasus spyware Article 21 surveillance