Supreme Court of India
8,182 judgments
IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. M/s NEW INDIA DETERGENTS LTD.
The Supreme Court dismissed the insurance company's statutory appeal, holding that the exclusion clause did not exempt it from paying storage charges awarded by the consumer commission.
IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. M/s NEW INDIA DETERGENTS LTD.
The Supreme Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that the exclusion clause did not exempt it from paying storage charges awarded by the consumer forum.
Bhag Singh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld compensation of Rs.4 lakhs per acre for land acquired in Village Sohana under the 1990 notification, rejecting higher compensation claims based on non-adjoining villages and subsequent acquisitions.
Swadesh Kumar Agarwal v. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors
The Supreme Court held that termination of an arbitrator's mandate on grounds of undue delay must be decided by the court under section 14(2) and that an application under section 11(6) is not maintainable absent a written arbitration agreement.
Bharat Sangh v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court upheld the ACC’s valid refusal to extend the petitioner’s tenure as Judicial Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules and discretionary authority.
Union of India v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court upheld the ACC's rejection of extension of tenure of a CAT Judicial Member, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules and binding nature of CAT and CJI recommendations.
Union of India v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court held that the ACC lawfully denied extension of a Judicial Member's term in accordance with the Selection Committee's binding recommendation to carry forward vacancies, setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
Reddy Veerana v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's direction to pay compensation at the commercial circle rate without deduction for development charges, imposed penal interest for delay, and dismissed NOIDA's appeal, affirming the landowner's right to just compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Reddy Veerana v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's right to compensation at the circle rate without development charge deductions, imposed statutory and penal interest, and dismissed NOIDA's appeal, emphasizing just compensation and protection of property rights under Article 300A.
J. Sekar Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the appellant due to lack of evidence of scheduled offence and proceeds of crime, emphasizing that criminal prosecution cannot continue when adjudication exonerates on merits.
J. Sekar Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the appellant due to closure of scheduled offence FIR for lack of evidence and exoneration in adjudication proceedings, holding that prosecution under PMLA requires a valid scheduled offence and proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Ritu Maheshwari v. M/S. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that applicants have no right to allotment under a terminated public scheme and must seek allotment under prevailing schemes, setting aside the High Court's order favoring the applicant club.
Ritu Maheshwari v. M/S. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that applicants have no right to allotment under a closed scheme and must be considered under prevailing schemes, setting aside the High Court's order favoring the club and dismissing contempt proceedings against Noida.
State of Bihar v. Shyama Nandan Mishra
The Supreme Court held that +2 lecturers appointed under Advertisement No. 1/87 are members of the Bihar Subordinate Education Service and entitled to merger benefits with the Bihar Education Service, quashing the State’s exclusionary notifications as arbitrary and unlawful.
State of Bihar v. Shyama Nandan Mishra
The Supreme Court upheld that +2 lecturers appointed under Advertisement No. 1/87 are members of the Bihar Subordinate Education Service and entitled to merger benefits with Bihar Education Service, quashing government notifications excluding them.
Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Supreme Court held that interest pendente lite can be included in the sum awarded under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration Act only if there is no contrary agreement between the parties, and upheld the arbitral award applying the parties' agreed interest terms.
Abdul Matin Mallick v. Subrata Bhattacharjee (Banerjee)
The Supreme Court held that deposit of the entire sale consideration plus 10% at the time of filing a pre-emption application under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 is mandatory, and failure to comply renders the application not maintainable, leading to dismissal of the pre-emption claim.
MS. P. v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of regular bail in a serious offence case due to non-application of mind and relevant material being overlooked, emphasizing the need for judicial reasoning and consideration of criminal antecedents and threat to the complainant.
MS. P. v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for an accused charged with serious offences, emphasizing the need for reasoned bail orders and considering criminal antecedents and conduct post-release.
Union of India v. Ashish Agrawal
The Supreme Court held that reassessment notices issued under Section 148 after April 1, 2021, must comply with the amended procedural safeguards under the Finance Act, 2021, and quashed non-compliant notices, passing a common order to regulate pending appeals.