Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Bhagwan Deen

05 Apr 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court set aside Tribunal and High Court orders upholding relief under the terminated LARSGESS Scheme, dismissing the respondents' application and allowing the Union of India's appeal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant LARSGESS Scheme Central Administrative Tribunal Scheme termination Writ petition

Union of India v. Major R. Metri

04 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court acquitted Major R. Metri of corruption charges due to involuntary confession and lack of corroboration, affirming the Armed Forces Tribunal's jurisdiction to reappreciate court-martial evidence under the AFT Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial confession voluntariness of confession Armed Forces Tribunal court-martial

Union of India v. Major R. Metri

04 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court acquitted Major R. Metri of corruption charges due to involuntary confession and lack of corroboration, setting aside his conviction and ordering reinstatement without back wages.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial confession voluntariness of confession Armed Forces Tribunal court-martial

Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology & Natural History v. Dr. Mathew K. Sebastian

04 Apr 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of an employee to back wages for the period of unemployment caused by a stay on reinstatement granted on the employer's appeal, rejecting the application of 'no work no pay' in such circumstances.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant back wages reinstatement stay order no work no pay

Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology & Natural History v. Dr. Mathew K. Sebastian

04 Apr 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the award of back wages to an employee prevented from joining service due to a stay on reinstatement granted at the employer's instance, clarifying burden of proof and applicability of 'no work no pay' principle.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant back wages reinstatement stay order burden of proof

Mallada K Sri Ram v. State of Telangana

04 Apr 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court quashed a preventive detention order against a white-collar offender, holding that stale allegations and mere apprehension of breach of law and order do not justify detention absent a real threat to public order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention public order white collar crime bail conditions

Mallada K Sri Ram v. State of Telangana

04 Apr 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court quashed a preventive detention order against a white collar offender for lack of fresh material and absence of a proximate threat to public order, emphasizing strict constitutional safeguards on preventive detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention public order law and order stale material

The State of Gujarat & Ors. v. H. B. Kapadia Education Trust & Anr.

02 Apr 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that minority educational institutions receiving government aid must comply with the Grant-in-Aid Code's age of superannuation provisions, and refusal to grant aid beyond prescribed age is not violative of Article 30(1).

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 30(1) Constitution of India minority educational institutions Grant-in-Aid Code superannuation age

Amritlal v. Shantilal Soni

01 Apr 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that for limitation under Section 468 CrPC, the relevant date is the complaint filing date, not the date of cognizance, and set aside the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings on limitation grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant limitation Section 468 CrPC date of filing complaint date of cognizance

Uma Devi Nambiar v. Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese

01 Apr 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that a Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of property, and unauthorized sales by an agent without such power are void, restoring the trial Court's decree for partition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney transfer of property constructive notice Section 3 Transfer of Property Act

Umadevi Nambiar v. Thamarasseri Roman Catholic Diocese

01 Apr 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that a Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of property, and unauthorized alienations by an agent do not bind the principal, restoring the trial Court's decree for partition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney Partition suit Transfer of Property Act Section 3 Transfer of Property Act Section 41

M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD v. MAHENDRA PAL BHATIA

01 Apr 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that properties falling within the broad definition of "mine" under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 vest absolutely in the Central Government and unauthorized occupants are liable to eviction under the Public Premises Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 definition of mine vesting of property

M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD v. MAHENDRA PAL BHATIA

01 Apr 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that lands and buildings used for mine-related purposes vest in the Central Government under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, validating eviction of unauthorized occupants under the Public Premises Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 definition of mine vesting of property

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Subhash @ Pappu

01 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld conviction of accused under Section 304 Part I r/w 149 IPC and Section 148 IPC based on a reliable dying declaration and participation in an unlawful assembly, while partially setting aside the High Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC

M/S FROST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. M/S MILAN DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS (P) LIMITED

01 Apr 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under the Orissa amendment to Section 115 CPC, the revisional court can reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, and a suit seeking declaratory relief to restrain proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act is barred under the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC Orissa Amendment Revisional jurisdiction Rejection of plaint

M/S FROST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. M/S MILAN DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS (P) LIMITED

01 Apr 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under the Orissa amendment to Section 115 CPC, the revisional court validly rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the suit sought barred reliefs attempting to restrain lawful proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC Orissa amendment revisional jurisdiction rejection of plaint

Tushar Arun Gandhi v. State of Gujarat

01 Apr 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court set aside the Gujarat High Court's summary dismissal of a PIL challenging a government resolution on Gandhi Ashram redevelopment, restoring the petition for full hearing after completion of pleadings.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Public Interest Litigation Gandhi Ashram Memorial Government Resolution

Tushar Arun Gandhi v. State of Gujarat

01 Apr 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court set aside the Gujarat High Court's summary dismissal of a PIL challenging a government resolution on Gandhi Ashram redevelopment, restoring the petition for fresh hearing with full opportunity to the parties.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Public Interest Litigation Gandhi Ashram Memorial Government Resolution

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI v. A. MAYILERUMPERUMAL

31 Mar 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B. R. GAVAI · 2022 INSC 378

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu's 2021 Act providing internal reservation within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities, affirming State legislative competence post the 102nd Amendment.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Reservation Most Backward Classes Denotified Communities 102nd Constitutional Amendment

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI v. A. MAYILERUMPERUMAL

31 Mar 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B. R. GAVAI
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Tamil Nadu 2021 Act providing internal reservation among Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities, holding the State has competence to sub-classify backward classes despite the 102nd Amendment Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act 105th Constitutional Amendment Act Article 342-A Article 31-B