Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Central Bureau of Investigation v. M/s. Sarvodaya Highways Ltd.

11 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1359

The Supreme Court held that a one-time settlement with a bank does not justify quashing criminal proceedings involving bank fraud and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, restoring prosecution against the defaulter company and its directors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC one-time settlement bank fraud fabricated documents

T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Others

11 Nov 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1306

The Supreme Court directed statutory constitution and empowerment of the Delhi Ridge Management Board as the single authority to protect and restore the Delhi Ridge and Morphological Ridge, mandating removal of encroachments and ensuring ecological conservation.

environmental petition_allowed Significant Delhi Ridge Morphological Ridge Indian Forest Act, 1927 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

K. Subramaniam through LRs; K.S. Balakrishnan & Ors. v. M/s Krishna Mills Pvt. Ltd.

11 Nov 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1309

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of lessee's heirs for wilful default in payment of court-fixed fair rent, holding that failure to pay without stay constitutes wilful default under the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant wilful default fair rent fixation eviction Rent Control Act 1960

Kapadam Sangalappa and Others v. Kamatam Sangalappa and Others

11 Nov 2025 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1307

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of execution of a 1933 compromise decree in a religious endowment dispute, emphasizing the decree-holder's burden to prove breach with concrete evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compromise decree execution petition burden of proof religious endowment

N. Peddi Raju and Others v. Hon’ble Judges of the High Court of Telangana

10 Nov 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1321

The Supreme Court held that lawyers making scandalous allegations against Judges commit contempt but may be forgiven upon unconditional apology accepted by the aggrieved Judge, emphasizing lawyers' paramount duty to uphold judicial dignity.

constitutional contempt_proceedings_closed Significant contempt of court scurrilous allegations judicial dignity lawyers' duty

Lipi Boilers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

10 Nov 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1297
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that excise duty is leviable only on movable excisable goods manufactured by the assessee, and the value of bought out items delivered directly to the buyer’s site cannot be included in the assessable value of a boiler cleared in CKD condition if the boiler, once erected, ceases to be excisable goods.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Duty Excisable Goods Movability Test Completely Knocked Down (CKD)

T. Manjunath v. The State of Karnataka

10 Nov 2025 · Sandeep Mehta; Vikram Nath · 2025 INSC 1356
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that exoneration in departmental proceedings does not bar criminal prosecution and remitted the issue of validity of sanction to the trial Court for fresh determination based on the actual appointing authority under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal other Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 competent authority departmental proceedings

Akula Narayana v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

10 Nov 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1301
Cites 1 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that an insurer must satisfy a motor accident compensation award despite breach of policy conditions and may recover the amount from the insured under the pay and recover principle.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability pay and recover principle breach of insurance policy

NANDKUMAR @ NANDU MANILAL MUDALIAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT

10 Nov 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1302
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's murder conviction under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, reducing the sentence to time served based on absence of intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC

RIYAS v. P. N. SHINOSH

10 Nov 2025 · J. K. Vinod Chandran; J. N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1303

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim involving a minor with 77.1% permanent disability, applying the multiplier method and awarding additional amounts for various heads including future medical expenses and loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability multiplier method future prospects

Commissioner of Service Tax v. M/s Elegant Developers

10 Nov 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1299

The Supreme Court held that transactions involving outright sale of land without agency or service component do not attract service tax as ‘Real Estate Agent’ services, and extended limitation cannot be invoked without deliberate suppression of facts.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Real Estate Agent Service Tax Finance Act 1994 Extended Period of Limitation

MITC Rolling Mills Private Limited and Anr. v. M/s Renuka Realtors

10 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1300
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is a decree and appealable under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, allowing the appeal and restoring it for merits consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint Section 13(1A) Commercial Courts Act appealability

R. Rajendran v. Kamar Nisha

10 Nov 2025 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1304

The Supreme Court held that DNA testing cannot be compelled without displacing the statutory presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Evidence Act and emphasized the protection of privacy and bodily autonomy in criminal investigations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant DNA testing Section 112 Indian Evidence Act presumption of legitimacy right to privacy

Rohan Vijay Nahar v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 1296
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that vesting of private forests under the Maharashtra Private Forests Acquisition Act requires valid service of notices under the Indian Forest Act and strict compliance with statutory procedures, setting aside High Court orders that disregarded these mandates.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Private Forests Acquisition Act, 1975 Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 35(3) notice service of notice

In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price

07 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1357

The Supreme Court mandated uniform, effective measures to control stray dogs and cattle, especially in institutional areas, to safeguard public safety and uphold the right to life under Article 21.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant stray dogs Animal Birth Control Rules 2023 Article 21 public safety

Srivastava & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

07 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1291

The Supreme Court upheld the lease cancellation but constituted a judicial enquiry committee to verify genuine allottees and formulate a plan for partial lease restoration and completion of the stalled housing project.

property other Significant lease cancellation housing cooperative society allottee verification partial lease restoration

Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. v. M/s. Brandavan Food Products

07 Nov 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 1294

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award entitling caterers to differential payment for second regular meals served, limiting judicial interference with arbitral awards on contractual interpretation and factual inferences.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arbitral award interference contractual modification waiver and estoppel

M/S SHANTI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. THE STATE OF ODISHA

07 Nov 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1295
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the term 'previous Financial Year' in tender rules means the last completed financial year for which Income Tax Returns have been filed by bid submission, setting aside the rejection of the highest bidder and directing a fresh tender to protect public interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant previous Financial Year Income Tax Return Odisha Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016 tender interpretation

Samiullah v. The State of Bihar & Ors.

07 Nov 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1292
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court struck down Bihar Registration Rules amendments requiring mutation proof for property registration as ultra vires and arbitrary, reaffirming that registration does not confer title and such conditions exceed rule-making powers.

property appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Section 69 Rule 19 Bihar Registration Rules Mutation

Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another

06 Nov 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1288
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that informing the grounds of arrest in writing in a language understood by the arrested person is a mandatory constitutional safeguard under Article 22(1), and non-compliance renders the arrest illegal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 22(1) Constitution of India grounds of arrest written communication Section 47 BNSS 2023