Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

SANDEEP SINGH BORA v. NARENDRA SINGH DEOPA

02 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 105

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot interfere in Panchayat election disputes except through election petitions as prescribed by law, setting aside the High Court's interim order allowing a disqualified candidate to contest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 243-O Panchayat elections Election petition Judicial review

The State of Tamil Nadu v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.

02 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 113
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to constitute a Tribunal for adjudication of the Pennaiyar River water dispute after failed negotiations between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

constitutional other Significant Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 Article 131 Constitution of India Pennaiyar River water dispute Water Disputes Tribunal

Rajia Begum v. Barnali Mukherjee

02 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 106

The Supreme Court held that disputes involving serious allegations of forgery of the arbitration agreement itself are non-arbitrable and must be adjudicated by courts before compelling arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement forgery fraud non-arbitrability

Yatendra Singh v. State of U.P. & Another

30 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 109

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored a complaint dismissed for default under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the interest of justice over procedural default.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint dismissed for default restoration of complaint interest of justice

Kumar Bajaj v. Union of India

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 101

The Supreme Court set aside a biased selection committee's rejection of a candidate's appointment to ITAT, directing a fresh impartial selection process and condemning mala fide departmental actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reasonable apprehension of bias natural justice compulsory retirement mala fide exercise of power

Bhola Nath v. The State of Jharkhand

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 99
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that long-serving contractual employees engaged after due selection are entitled to regularization, and the State's arbitrary refusal violates Article 14, directing immediate regularization.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual employment regularization Article 14 model employer

Rhythm County v. Satish Sanjay Hegde & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 102

The Supreme Court upheld the NGT's authority to impose and quantify environmental compensation based on project cost and expert inputs, dismissing appeals challenging compensation orders against two real estate developers for environmental violations.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Compensation National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Polluter Pays Principle Environmental Clearance

Doniyar Vildanov v. The State of U.P.

30 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 95

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a narcotics case due to procedural lapses and discrepancies in prosecution evidence undermining lawful search and seizure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act search and seizure consent letter reasonable doubt

YASH CHARITABLE TRUST v. UNION OF INDIA

30 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 96
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that stem cell therapy for Autism Spectrum Disorder cannot be offered as routine treatment outside approved clinical trials, emphasizing medical practitioners' duty of care and regulatory compliance.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant stem cell therapy Autism Spectrum Disorder New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules, 2019 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Usman Ali v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

30 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2026 INSC 98

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of bail to an accused in a murder case, holding that cancellation of bail requires exceptional circumstances which were absent here.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail cancellation of bail dying declaration pre-trial incarceration

Dr. S. Mohan v. Secretary to the Chancellor, Puducherry Technological University

30 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 100

The Supreme Court held that the Puducherry Technological University Act's provisions on Vice-Chancellor appointment violated mandatory UGC Regulations under exclusive Central legislative competence, invalidated the appointment but allowed the incumbent to complete his tenure to avoid disruption.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Puducherry Technological University Act, 2019 University Grants Commission Regulations, 2018 Search-cum-Selection Committee Vice-Chancellor appointment

M/S SAISUDHIR ENERGY LTD v. M/S NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD

30 Jan 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 103
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that in public utility contracts, liquidated damages can be awarded without proof of actual loss and limited judicial modification of arbitral awards is permissible, restoring the Single Judge's award of reasonable compensation for delay in commissioning a solar power project.

civil appeal_allowed Significant liquidated damages public utility contract arbitration award modification Section 34 Arbitration Act

Monty Goyal v. Navrang Singh

29 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 94

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the disciplinary order against an advocate where the complainant had withdrawn the complaint by affidavit and no evidence was led to prove professional misconduct.

professional_misconduct / administrative appeal_allowed Significant professional misconduct advocates act disciplinary proceedings withdrawal of complaint

Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule & Ors.

29 Jan 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 92
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that applications for extension of arbitral award time under Section 29A lie before the Civil Court or High Court as defined in Section 2(1)(e), not before the High Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 for appointment of arbitrators.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A Section 11 Court definition

K.M. Shaji v. M. V. Nikesh Kumar

29 Jan 2026 · B.V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 111

The Supreme Court held that only the President of India can disqualify a candidate found guilty of corrupt practices under the RP Act, setting aside the High Court's order of disqualification while upholding the setting aside of the election.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 corrupt practices disqualification Section 8A

RAM SINGH v. RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH

29 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 110
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court set aside adverse observations of the High Court in an election petition after granting interim stay and declined to decide the appeal on merits due to expiry of the appellant's tenure.

constitutional appeal_allowed election petition postal ballots Representation of the People Act, 1951 interim stay

M/S AARSUDAY PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD v. JOGEN CHOWDHURY

29 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 93

The Supreme Court upheld the demolition of unauthorized construction on "khoai" land near Visva-Bharati University, affirming the exclusive competence of Panchayat Samiti for building permissions in notified areas and enforcing environmental and heritage preservation mandates.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant khoai land land use conversion building permission Panchayat Samiti competence

Habib Alladin & Ors. v. Mohammed Ahmed

28 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 90
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Wakf Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Wakf Act, 1995 is limited to properties included in the list of auqaf or registered under the Act, and upheld the Tribunal's jurisdiction in a suit alleging obstruction of a Mosque established by user.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Wakf Act, 1995 Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction List of Auqaf Wakf by user

Bernard Lyngdoh Phawa v. The State of Meghalaya

27 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 85

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction for murder due to insufficient corroborated evidence and procedural lapses, restoring the Trial Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory confessional statement Section 164 CrPC

M/S PREMIUM TRANSMISSION PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

27 Jan 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 87

The Supreme Court upheld the reference of an industrial dispute involving contract labour to the Industrial Court, holding that prior written demand to the employer is not mandatory and that sham contracts and employer-employee relationship are to be adjudicated by the Industrial Court.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 industrial dispute conciliation contract labour