Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sant Rohidas Leather Industries and Charmakar Development Corporation Ltd. v. Vijaya Bank

19 Mar 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 264
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a corporate depositor availing banking services is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act if the services are for commercial purposes, and allegations involving fraud require adjudication in civil or criminal courts, not summary consumer forums.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection commercial purpose fixed deposit receipt banking services

Virinder Pal Singh v. Punjab and Sind Bank

19 Mar 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 266
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disciplinary proceedings initiated before retirement can continue post-retirement under Service Regulations, permitting imposition of penalties such as reduction in pay scale, and dismissed the appeal challenging such punishment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings post-retirement service regulations pension regulations superannuation

2 Million Lives at Risk v. Rajasthan

18 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 316

The Supreme Court mandated stringent enforcement and coordinated remedial measures to address systemic pollution and environmental degradation of the Jojari River in Rajasthan, emphasizing State accountability and the Polluter Pays principle.

environmental other Significant Jojari River contamination environmental degradation Polluter Pays principle Common Effluent Treatment Plants

R. HALLE v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

18 Mar 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 260
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by holding that uncontroverted medical and neuropsychological evidence of severe cognitive impairment warrants assessing functional disability at 100%, overruling the High Court's reduction to 30%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant functional disability permanent disability loss of earning capacity motor accident claim

Steel Authority of India v. Shambhu Prasad Singh

18 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 263

The Supreme Court held that SAIL can withhold gratuity and adjust penal rent for ex-employees retaining staff quarters beyond permissible periods, overruling earlier concessions and emphasizing simultaneous discharge of reciprocal obligations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SAIL Gratuity Rules 1978 gratuity withholding staff quarter retention penal rent

Union of India v. Prakash Industries Limited

17 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 250

The Supreme Court held that the Respondent is entitled to coal supply at the current rate for the suspended period under a fresh agreement, rejecting claims for monetary compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Fuel Supply Agreement coal supply suspension compensation current price

Subramani v. State of Karnataka

17 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 249

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a husband for murdering his wife by setting her on fire, relying on a credible dying declaration and corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 498A IPC burn injuries

Charan Preet Singh v. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh

17 Mar 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2026 INSC 248

The Supreme Court held that immunity of Ninth Schedule laws from judicial review is subject to the basic structure doctrine and directed creation of a supernumerary post to accommodate both candidates in a recruitment dispute involving constitutional interpretation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Ninth Schedule Article 31B Judicial review Fundamental rights

Mohammad Kaleem v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17 Mar 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 251

The Supreme Court held that the Trial Court erred in rejecting the application to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC by applying an unduly strict standard, and allowed the appeal directing their summoning based on strong and cogent evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused standard of evidence pre-trial scrutiny

Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India

17 Mar 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 246
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that limiting maternity benefits to adoptive mothers of children below three months is unconstitutional as it violates Articles 14 and 21 by arbitrarily discriminating against adoptive mothers and denying holistic care rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant maternity benefit adoptive mother Article 14 Article 21

Canara Bank Overseas Branch v. Archean Industries Private Limited

17 Mar 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 247
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the liability of Defendant No. 1 under a valid contract of guarantee and affirmed the third-party decree against the Bank for erroneous remittance, dismissing both appeals.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contract of guarantee Indian Contract Act 1872 third-party procedure foreign exchange remittance

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD v. SAYONA COLORS PVT. LTD

17 Mar 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 287

The Supreme Court repudiated a fraudulent fire insurance claim based on deliberate arson, setting aside the consumer commission's partial award and emphasizing that fraud vitiates all claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim fraudulent claim deliberate arson fire insurance

Sharla Bazliel v. Baldev Thakur

17 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 252

The Supreme Court held that an FIR alleging forgery and fraud cannot be quashed prematurely under Section 482 CrPC when forensic examination is pending, and directed continuation of investigation and trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC forgery fraud

Vishvjeet and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 254
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court granted bail and transferred the criminal proceedings against toll plaza employees to Delhi after condemning violent intimidation by Bar Association members that obstructed their right to legal representation and fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 21 Article 32 bail fundamental rights

Shiny C.J. & Ors. v. Shalini Sreenivasan & Ors.

16 Mar 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 242
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that graduate Anganwadi Workers with SSLC and experience are eligible to apply under both the 11% graduate quota and the 29% SSLC quota for Supervisor vacancies in ICDS, overturning the High Court's exclusionary interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Anganwadi Workers Integrated Child Development Scheme quota reservation graduate eligibility

Bhola Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

16 Mar 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 257

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order convicting the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC due to procedural lapses in appointing amicus curiae without notice and remanded the appeal for fresh hearing with directions to ensure fair representation and expeditious disposal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant amicus curiae criminal appeal Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC v. P. CHANDRAMOULI

16 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 241

The Supreme Court held that amounts received under employer-provided group insurance cannot be deducted from statutory motor accident compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and dismissed appeals challenging enhanced compensation awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation group insurance

The State of Himachal Pradesh v. Surat Singh

16 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 240
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to mandatory non-compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act regarding personal search consent, rendering the conviction unsustainable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act personal search consent for search search and seizure

Rajendra v. State of Uttarakhand

13 Mar 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 238

The Supreme Court overturned the rape conviction due to unexplained delay, inconsistencies in the victim's testimony, and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing that sole testimony must inspire confidence to sustain conviction.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant rape Section 376 IPC delay in FIR sole testimony

Mizo Chief Council Mizoram v. Union of India

13 Mar 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 236
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the Mizo Chiefs' writ petition under Article 32 for delay and laches, holding that unreasonable delay without valid explanation bars relief even in fundamental rights cases.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 32 delay and laches fundamental right to property Mizo Chiefs