Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association v. Anna Nagar Cricket Club

13 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 154

The Supreme Court held that governance reforms mandated in S. Nithya do not apply to district cricket associations governed by BCCI norms, clarifying the limited scope of judicial intervention in sports administration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sports governance District cricket association BCCI Constitution S. Nithya directions

Pawan Kumar v. Union of India

13 Feb 2026 · J. K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 156
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed regularization of casual workers in the Income Tax Department who rendered continuous service, emphasizing fairness over strict adherence to Umadevi's ten-year criterion.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of casual workers continuous service Umadevi judgment irregular vs illegal appointment

Manoj v. State of Maharashtra; Prakash v. State of Maharashtra

13 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 152
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under the Essential Commodities Act for possession of cement, holding that statutory control over cement was withdrawn before the alleged offence, rendering the prosecution unsustainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Cement Control Order, 1967 Statutory decontrol Section 3 and Section 7 E.C. Act

Balmukund Singh Gautam v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

13 Feb 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 157

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted to an absconding accused, holding that such relief is generally not available to fugitives and acquittal of co-accused does not entitle bail on parity grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail absconding accused Section 438 CrPC proclaimed offender

Harbinder Singh Sekhon & Ors. v. The State of Punjab & Ors.

13 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 159
Cites 0 · Cited by 43

The Supreme Court held that a Change of Land Use contrary to the operative Master Plan is illegal and cannot be retrospectively validated by administrative approvals, quashing the CLU and related environmental permissions granted for a cement grinding unit in Punjab.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Change of Land Use Master Plan Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 Environmental clearance

State Bank of India v. Union of India

13 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 153

The Supreme Court held that spectrum is a natural resource owned by the Government and while spectrum usage rights are intangible assets subject to insolvency, Government dues cannot be wiped off and spectrum transfer requires prior governmental approval.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Spectrum ownership Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Telecom licences Operational debt

R. SAVITHRI NAIDU v. M/S THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

12 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 150
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser acquiring property after institution of arbitration proceedings and passing of an arbitral award is a transferee pendente lite barred from resisting execution, dismissing the appeal challenging attachment of the property for realisation of the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transferee pendente lite Order XXI Rule 102 CPC arbitral award enforcement lis pendens

Union of India v. SGT Girish Kumar

12 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 149

The Supreme Court held that arrears of disability pension, once judicially affirmed, cannot be restricted by limitation or delay and must be paid from the date they became due, dismissing the Union of India's appeals.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension broad banding arrears limitation

B. PRASHANTH HEGDE v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

12 Feb 2026 · P. S. Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 155
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court upheld the admission of a Section 7 IBC application as within limitation, holding that debt acknowledgments through restructuring agreements and balance sheets restart the limitation period and minor procedural omissions do not warrant rejection.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 7 IBC limitation period acknowledgment of debt Section 18 Limitation Act

Hemlata Eknath Pise v. Shubham Bahu-uddeshiya Sanstha Waddhamna

11 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 147

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's partial remand order and directed a comprehensive reconsideration of all issues in the disciplinary dismissal case, emphasizing the need to decide all points with reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings principles of natural justice remand reinstatement

Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. & Others

11 Feb 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 144
Cites 1 · Cited by 34

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to an accused involved in a forged law degree racket, emphasizing strict judicial scrutiny of bail orders and rejecting transfer of investigation absent exceptional circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail forgery criminal antecedents fabricated degrees

N. MANOHARAN v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

11 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 143
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that employees of the Heavy Water Plant, Department of Atomic Energy, are excluded from the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as they are Central Government employees governed by CCS Pension Rules.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Heavy Water Plant Department of Atomic Energy

HERO CYCLES LIMITED & ANOTHER v. HERO ECOTECH LIMITED & OTHERS

10 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 169

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court and trial court orders for improper adjudication under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC and restored the application for fresh trial ensuring procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC Section 151 CPC Article 227 Constitution Contempt proceedings

Abdul Khalek & Others v. The State of Assam & Others

10 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 140

The Supreme Court upheld the State’s constitutional duty to remove unauthorized encroachments from reserved forests while mandating fair procedural safeguards including notice, hearing, and speaking orders before eviction.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reserved forest unauthorized encroachment environmental protection constitutional obligation

J. Muthurajan & Anr. v. S. Vaikundarajan & Ors.

10 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 139
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a suit challenging a partition deed and a purported conciliation award on grounds of fraud and coercion discloses a prima facie cause of action and cannot be dismissed at the threshold, restoring the suit for trial alongside execution objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Partition Deed Conciliation Award Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Order VII Rule 11 CPC

We the Women of India v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

10 Feb 2026 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 165
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of charges from attempt to commit rape, holding that the accused's acts constituted an attempt under Section 376 IPC read with the POCSO Act, and directed the creation of guidelines to foster judicial sensitivity in sexual offence cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC POCSO Act

State of Odisha & Ors. v. Managing Committee of Namatara Girls High School

09 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 148
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Odisha's appeal as time-barred, holding that excessive bureaucratic delay does not justify condonation of delay without sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Limitation Act, 1963 sufficient cause State as litigant

Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer v. M/S S.V. Global Mill Limited

09 Feb 2026 · M. M. Sundresh; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 138
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act are barred by limitation if not filed within the statutory period, and the Limitation Act does not extend or condone delay beyond the 2013 Act’s prescribed timelines.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 24(1)(a)

Thammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan

06 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 134
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that a notarised photocopy of a Power of Attorney without proper foundation is inadmissible secondary evidence, rendering sale deeds executed thereunder void.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Power of Attorney Secondary Evidence Indian Evidence Act Registration Act

Amit Kumar v. Union of India

06 Feb 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 128
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the appointment of Dr. T.C.A. Anant as Technical Consultant to the National Task Force and mandated the Ministry of Education to provide necessary support and remuneration for scientific analysis of survey data.

administrative other Technical Consultant National Task Force Survey Data Analysis Appointment