Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Sri Lakshmi Hotel Pvt. Limited v. Sriram City Union Finance Ltd.

18 Nov 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1327

The Supreme Court upheld a 24% interest rate arbitral award, affirming the arbitrator's discretion to grant post-award interest and rejecting claims of usurious interest and public policy violation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(b) post-award interest usurious interest

SHRI DIGANT v. M/S. P.D.T. TRADING CO.

18 Nov 2025 · Manoj Misra; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1352
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a counsel's pursis claiming no instructions does not amount to withdrawal of Vakalatnama and the High Court erred in setting aside trial and appellate orders for procedural lapses when the litigant failed to act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Vakalatnama withdrawal pursis claiming no instructions Maharashtra Rent Control Act Article 226 jurisdiction

Raj Kumar @ Bheema v. State of NCT of Delhi

17 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1322
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court overturned a murder conviction due to unreliable eyewitness identification via video conferencing, flawed identification parade, and uncorroborated recoveries, emphasizing procedural safeguards for remote testimony.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant eyewitness identification video conferencing testimony Test Identification Parade disclosure statement

Ratnaparki and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra

17 Nov 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1323

The Supreme Court quashed the entire FIR including the offence of dacoity where the complainant settled the dispute amicably and all property was returned, negating dishonest intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent powers dacoity

T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Others

17 Nov 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; A.S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1325

The Supreme Court upheld strict ecological and regulatory standards for Tiger Safaris in buffer zones of Tiger Reserves, mandated restoration of environmental damage in Corbett Tiger Reserve, and directed accountability of responsible officials under the polluter pays principle.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Tiger Reserve Tiger Safari Corbett Tiger Reserve Ecological Restoration

Kolanjiammal v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

14 Nov 2025 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1319

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that failure to invoke statutory remedies under the Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act within the prescribed period bars collateral challenge to a confirmed auction sale.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Revenue Recovery Act Sections 37-A and 38 auction sale statutory remedies

Govind v. State of Haryana

14 Nov 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1318

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges, holding that recovery and forensic evidence alone, without corroboration from eyewitnesses or independent witnesses, cannot sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 25 Arms Act recovery of weapon hostile witness

State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu

13 Nov 2025 · B.R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1343
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the expert bodies' jurisdiction over the Mekedatu project and rejected Tamil Nadu's plea to stay Karnataka's DPR preparation, emphasizing judicial restraint in technical water disputes.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir Central Water Commission Cauvery Water Management Authority

Dinesh Kumar Jaldhari v. State of Chhattisgarh

13 Nov 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1317

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under aggravated sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the primacy of consistent ocular evidence over medical findings, but reduced the sentence from seven to six years.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault child victim ocular evidence

Union of India v. Indraj

13 Nov 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1313
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that judicial review in disciplinary cases is limited to the inquiry process and upheld removal of a public servant for proven misappropriation despite subsequent deposit of funds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry misappropriation judicial review removal from service

IN RE: SARANDA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

13 Nov 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1311

The Supreme Court directed the State of Jharkhand to expeditiously declare the Saranda forest area as a Wildlife Sanctuary under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, emphasizing the State's statutory and constitutional duty to protect ecologically significant forests despite socio-economic concerns.

environmental other Significant Saranda Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Eco-Sensitive Zone Wildlife Institute of India

Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1315

The Supreme Court held that an insurer cannot repudiate a boiler insurance claim based on post-accident survey reports indicating wear and corrosion when the accident involved an explosion during the currency of a valid policy and no material non-disclosure by the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim repudiation exclusion clause 5 Boilers Act, 1923 utmost good faith

M/S POLY MEDICURE LTD. v. M/S BRILLIO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Misra; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 1314

The Supreme Court held that a company purchasing software to automate its business processes for profit maximization is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and dismissed the appeal challenging the non-maintainability of the consumer complaint.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer definition commercial purpose Consumer Protection Act 1986 software purchase

Union of India v. Vigin K. Varghese

13 Nov 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1316

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders in a commercial quantity narcotics case for failure to apply the statutory requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 bail commercial quantity

Dalip Singh v. Sawan Singh

12 Nov 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1498
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that in usufructuary mortgages, the limitation period for redemption starts from the date of payment or tender of mortgage money, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's order allowing redemption.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant usufructuary mortgage right of redemption limitation period Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Rikhab Chand Jain v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 1337

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s refusal to entertain a writ petition challenging customs confiscation and penalty orders, emphasizing the necessity to exhaust statutory remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 Customs Act 1962 alternative remedy

Sanjay Tiwari v. Yugal Kishore Prasad Sao & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1310

The Supreme Court held that a counter claim cannot be maintained against a co-defendant and set aside the counter claim filed by defendants 2 and 3 while upholding their impleadment in a suit for specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant counter claim co-defendant specific performance impleadment

Rakesh Mittal v. Ajay Pal Gupta

12 Nov 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 161
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to a habitual offender with serious criminal antecedents and forged identities, emphasizing cautious exercise of bail discretion considering individual conduct and offence gravity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail criminal antecedents parity principle habitual offender

T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

11 Nov 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1344

The Supreme Court held that prosecution sanction orders passed during its ongoing proceedings can only be challenged before it, not before High Courts, and transferred a writ petition challenging such sanction to itself while accepting the accused officer's apology for procedural misconduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prosecution sanction Section 197 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act High Court jurisdiction

Surendra Koli v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

11 Nov 2025 · Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath · 2025 INSC 1308

The Supreme Court allowed the curative petition, setting aside the petitioner’s conviction and death sentence due to irreconcilable conflicting judgments on identical evidence, holding the confession and recoveries inadmissible and affirming the fundamental right to fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Landmark curative petition Section 164 CrPC confession Section 27 Evidence Act voluntariness of confession