Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

Kanta and Others v. Soma Devi through LRs and Others

06 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 133

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, holding that detailed pleadings and proof of possession are essential for injunction or recovery of possession claims, and upheld the defendant's ownership under Hindu Succession Act maintenance provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant perpetual injunction recovery of possession Hisadari possession Hindu Succession Act 1956

V. PATHMAVATHI & ORS. v. BHARTHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD & ANR.

06 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 131

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by mandating 40% addition for future prospects and clarified that loss of love and affection is subsumed within loss of consortium, not a separate head.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 future prospects loss of consortium loss of love and affection

State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd.

06 Feb 2026 · M. M. Sundresh; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 132
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that the Revenue Officer lacked statutory power to review a final vesting order under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953, and that the respondent-company failed to prove entitlement to retain agricultural land under Section 6(1)(j), thereby setting aside the 2008 review order and upholding the 1971 vesting order.

property appeal_allowed Significant West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 Section 6(1)(j) power of review quasi-judicial authority

ITC LIMITED v. AASHNA ROY

06 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2026 INSC 135
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that large compensation claims in consumer disputes must be supported by reliable evidence and fair procedure, setting aside an excessive award based on unauthenticated photocopies and procedural lapses.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deficiency in service compensation quantum principles of natural justice

Jane Kaushik v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Feb 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 129
Cites 0 · Cited by 416

The Supreme Court allowed the inclusion of a new member to an Advisory Committee while permitting a former member to continue, ensuring effective representation of transgender rights expertise.

constitutional other Advisory Committee Centre for Law and Policy Research transgender rights Amicus Curiae

Shashin Patel and Anr. v. Uday Dalal and Ors.

05 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 125

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of occupants and their successors to membership in a cooperative housing society despite belated payment, validating subsequent property transfer and emphasizing remedies for delayed contributions.

property appeal_allowed Significant cooperative housing society membership admission belated payment Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

Reginamary Chellamani v. State Rep by Superintendent of Customs

05 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 127
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant charged under the NDPS Act after prolonged custody, emphasizing the right to legal representation and parity with co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity legal representation

State of West Bengal v. Confederation of State Government Employees, West Bengal

05 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2026 INSC 123

The Supreme Court held that Dearness Allowance is a legally enforceable right of State Government employees linked to inflation and protected under Article 21, rejecting the State's financial incapacity defense and ordering payment of arrears.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Dearness Allowance Article 21 Article 14 West Bengal Services (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 2009

Dorairaj v. Doraisamy

05 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 126

The Supreme Court upheld the joint family character of disputed agricultural properties, validated alienations made for legal necessity, rejected a suspicious Will, and dismissed appeals challenging partition shares.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint Hindu family property partition Karta self-acquisition

M/s Shyam Beej Bhandar & Anr. v. Suresh

05 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 158

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal in a consumer dispute over substandard groundnut seeds, modifying compensation to reflect both seed deficiency and natural factors affecting crop yield.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deficiency in service groundnut seeds crop failure

Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 124
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court quashed rape proceedings based on false promise of marriage against a married woman, holding that such promise is unenforceable and does not vitiate consent under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant false promise of marriage consent vitiation Section 376(2)(n) IPC rape

Mohtashem Billah Malik v. Sana Aftab

04 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 118

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's custody order restoring custody to the mother, emphasizing that welfare of children includes conduct, foreign custody orders, and violation of court undertakings, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody of minors welfare of children Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 violation of court undertaking

Rupesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India

04 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 119

The Supreme Court held that cadre allocation in Civil Services is final and a candidate cannot claim a change years later based on senior candidates not joining, dismissing the appellant's plea for Rajasthan cadre allocation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Civil Services Examination cadre allocation insider vacancy finality of appointment

Vinit Bahri and Another v. M/S MGF Developers Ltd.

04 Feb 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 114

The Supreme Court held that mere leasing of a residential flat does not exclude the purchaser from the definition of 'consumer' under the Consumer Protection Act, placing the burden on the service provider to prove commercial purpose, and restored the complaint for merits.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant consumer definition commercial purpose Consumer Protection Act 1986 burden of proof

ANKHIM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. v. ZAVERI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

04 Feb 2026 · J.B. PARDIWALA; K.V. VISWANATHAN · 2026 INSC 137
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that substitution of an arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act preserves prior arbitral proceedings and the moratorium under the IBC does not invalidate arbitration, setting aside the High Court's declaration of nullity of proceedings conducted during the moratorium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15 substitution of arbitrator Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Moratorium under Section 14 IBC

M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited v. Rajasthan Housing Board

04 Feb 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 116
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that under the pre-2015 Arbitration Act regime, the Section 11 court's order appointing an arbitrator conclusively decides the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, barring parties from disputing it later, and set aside lower courts' orders invalidating awards on that ground.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment Arbitration agreement validity Clause 23 contract interpretation

U.P. Junior High School Council Instructor Welfare Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

04 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 117
Cites 0 · Cited by 17

The Supreme Court held that part time contractual instructors in Uttar Pradesh are entitled to periodic revision of honorarium, directed payment of Rs.17,000/- per month from 2017-18 onwards, and ruled that reduction of sanctioned honorarium amounts to prohibited forced labor.

labor appeal_allowed Significant part time contractual teachers honorarium revision Right to Education Act Project Approval Board

Pramod Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

04 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 120
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that further investigation after submission of a final report under Section 173(2) CrPC requires prior judicial permission, and police or executive authorities cannot unilaterally order such investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 173(8) CrPC Further investigation Closure report Judicial permission

Sushil Kamalnayan Bharuka & Others v. State of Maharashtra & Others

03 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 168

The Supreme Court held that cancellation of an auction in favor of the highest bidder without material irregularity is unjustified and set aside the cancellation, directing allotment and sale deed execution consistent with prior High Court rulings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction cancellation highest bidder public auction judicial consistency

C. Velusamy v. K Indhera

03 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 112
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that courts can extend the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A even after an award is rendered post expiry of the statutory period, ensuring arbitration proceedings reach a conclusive award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 29A Arbitration and Conciliation Act extension of arbitrator mandate arbitral award validity arbitration timelines