Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

MUDDAM RAJU YADAV v. B. RAJA SHANKER

10 Mar 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 214

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's finding that the sale agreement was a sham executed as security for a loan, denying specific performance due to the plaintiff's lack of bona fides and concealment of material facts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement of sale sham agreement loan security

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority v. Dharmalingam & Ors.

10 Mar 2026 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2026 INSC 269

The Supreme Court held that reconveyance of lawfully acquired land under Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act is discretionary upon the State's satisfaction that the land is not required for any public purpose, and courts cannot impose time limits on utilisation or direct reconveyance absent such satisfaction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 48-B Section 16-B reconveyance of land

Ramadebi Rautray v. State of Odisha

10 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 243

The Supreme Court held that a candidate disqualified under Section 45(1)(v) of the Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act cannot hold office, and where only two candidates contested, the other candidate is entitled to be declared elected without fresh elections.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 Section 45(1)(v) Election petition Disqualification

Rashmi Singh v. The State of Bihar

10 Mar 2026 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2026 INSC 308

The Supreme Court held that a no-confidence motion under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act requires majority support of the total elected members, not just those present at the meeting, to uphold democratic integrity.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant no-confidence motion Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 majority of total members special meeting

Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan

10 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 217
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and inadmissibility of call detail records without mandatory certification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence chain of custody Section 65-B Evidence Act call detail records

Manoj Kumar Mutta v. State of Andhra Pradesh

10 Mar 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 215

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant implicated in spurious liquor manufacture, emphasizing his prior non-inclusion in the FIR, cooperation with investigation, and absence of misuse of liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail spurious liquor manufacture of counterfeit liquor custodial interrogation

Dr. Sushil Kumar Purbey & Anr. v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

09 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 212

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the complainant's in-laws due to general allegations identical to those against the sister-in-law, emphasizing uniform application of standards for quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings Section 482 CrPC general and omnibus allegations dowry harassment

Gobind Singh v. Union of India

09 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 211
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' claim to title and possession over land, rejecting their application for additional evidence and holding that adverse possession cannot be claimed against the State or Union Government.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence ex parte decree adverse possession

Abhishek Sharma v. The State of Jammu and Kashmir

09 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 220
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excluding employees appointed on academic arrangement basis from regularisation under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 violates Article 14, directing their inclusion upon fulfillment of statutory conditions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant regularisation academic arrangement Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 Article 14

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Adhunik Power & Natural Resource Ltd.

27 Feb 2026 · Surya Kant; B. V. Nagarathna; Joymalya Bagchi · 2026 INSC 202

The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a captive coal block and subsequent legislation constitute Change in Law events entitling compensation under a power purchase agreement, while indemnity clauses protect against coal cost escalation only prior to such events.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Change in Law Power Purchase Agreement Captive Coal Block Coal Mines (Special Provision) Act, 2015

Arjun & Anr. v. Mukesh & Ors.

27 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 227

The Supreme Court held that civil courts must refer tenancy disputes to revenue courts but cannot reject suits outright when related tenancy suits are pending, restoring a suit challenging a gift deed involving ancestral property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant khatedari rights Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 civil court jurisdiction revenue court

Torrent Power Ltd. v. Ashish Arjunkumar Rathi & Others

27 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 206

The Supreme Court upheld the non-interference with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving a resolution plan under the IBC, dismissing challenges alleging modification of the plan and material irregularity.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Committee of Creditors Resolution Plan Commercial Wisdom

BHAGYALAXMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. v. BABALDAS AMTHARAM PATEL

27 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 205

The Supreme Court held that sureties are liable only up to the originally sanctioned loan amount and discharged from liability for excess withdrawals made without their consent under Section 133 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

civil appeal_allowed Significant surety liability Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 133 Section 139

DR. JIJI K.S. v. SHIBU K

27 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2026 INSC 207
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld its earlier judgment protecting appellants' promotions without Ph.D. qualification and clarified remedies for non-parties aggrieved by tribunal or court orders affecting their service rights.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Technical Education Service Rules AICTE Regulations Ph.D. qualification Promotion in technical education

Ankit Tomar v. State of Haryana

26 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 262
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging rape on promise of marriage, holding that a consensual relationship with a married complainant negates the offence under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent rape promise of marriage quashing of FIR

S G Jamaludheen v. State of Karnataka

26 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 235

The Supreme Court resolved a long-standing recruitment dispute by permitting withdrawal of challenges and directing appointment of identified candidates with conditions, upholding existing appointments and making interim orders absolute under Article 142.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Inspectors recruitment Karnataka Public Service Commission Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Central Government Notification

NOIL CHRISTURAJ v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

26 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 201
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court holds that simultaneous insolvency proceedings under the IBC against a principal debtor and its corporate guarantor are maintainable, rejecting the doctrine of election and affirming statutory safeguards against double recovery.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Simultaneous proceedings Corporate guarantor

Suhas Chakma v. Union of India

26 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 198

The Supreme Court mandated States to establish and expand Open Correctional Institutions as a constitutionally compliant, rehabilitative solution to prison overcrowding, ensuring prisoners' dignity and rights under Article 21.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Open Correctional Institutions prison overcrowding Article 21 prisoners' rights

Vivekananda Kendra v. Pradeep Kumar Agarwalla

26 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 199

The Supreme Court held that a registered 99-year lease deed confers a leasehold interest that cannot be unilaterally cancelled, and a subsequent sale during its subsistence is subject to the lessee's rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease deed license unilateral cancellation exclusive possession

THE STATE OF KERALA v. M/s. PANACEA BIOTEC LTD.

26 Feb 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 200
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that complaints filed by public servants are exempt from mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC, limitation runs from when accused identity is known, and vicarious liability under Section 34 of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act is a trial issue, thereby setting aside the High Court's quashing orders and allowing prosecution to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 202 CrPC public servant complaint limitation period Section 34 Drugs & Cosmetics Act