Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

Elegna Co-op. Housing and Commercial Society Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

15 Jan 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 58

The Supreme Court upheld mandatory admission of CIRP upon proof of financial debt and default, dismissed intervention by a maintenance society lacking locus standi, and emphasized that IBC is a resolution, not mere recovery, mechanism.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 admission Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Financial creditor

VAYYAETI SRINIVASARAO v. GAINEEDI JAGAJYOTHI

15 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 59

The Supreme Court held that possession held by a tenant prior to and after an agreement to sell, without surrender of tenancy, does not amount to delivery of possession under the agreement, and thus the agreement is not a conveyance attracting stamp duty under the Andhra Pradesh Stamp Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement to sell stamp duty deemed conveyance possession

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer v. Yati Jain & Ors.

15 Jan 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 64
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's directions to appoint candidates from reserve lists against vacancies caused by non-joining, affirming the Public Service Commission's locus standi to appeal and clarifying the operation and validity of waiting lists in recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Public Service Commission locus standi waiting list reserve list

Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra

15 Jan 2026 · M. M. Sundresh; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 79
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed States to adopt a uniform police media briefing policy based on an Amicus Curiae-prepared Manual within three months, emphasizing transparency and accountability in police communications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Police Manual for Media Briefing Amicus Curiae media briefing policy police transparency

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Chaman Lal

15 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 57
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court restored the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on a credible dying declaration, setting aside the High Court's acquittal which was founded on erroneous appreciation of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC appellate interference murder

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) AND OTHERS v. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

15 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala · 2026 INSC 60

The Supreme Court held that valid tax residency certificates conclusively establish treaty benefits under the India-Mauritius DTAA, protecting capital gains from indirect transfers acquired before 2017, and domestic anti-abuse rules cannot override such treaty protections.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Tax Residency Certificate Capital Gains Tax Grandfathering Clause

M/S. BANGALORE CLUB v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

14 Jan 2026 · D.K. Jain; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that interest earned by a club on fixed deposits with member banks engaged in commercial operations is taxable income, as it does not satisfy the doctrine of mutuality.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant doctrine of mutuality income tax exemption identity of contributors and participators commerciality

Kanchana Rai v. Geeta Sharma

13 Jan 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 54

The Supreme Court held that a widowed daughter-in-law, regardless of when she became a widow, is a dependant entitled to claim maintenance from the estate of her deceased father-in-law under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance widow daughter-in-law Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India

13 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 55
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2018, emphasizing the need for independent oversight in prior approval mechanisms to balance protection of honest public servants with the rule of law.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 17A Prevention of Corruption Act prior approval for investigation constitutional validity Articles 14 and 21

State of Haryana v. Krishan Kumar & Ors.

13 Jan 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 63

The Supreme Court held that only the Central Government has the power to prescribe qualifications for Drug Inspectors under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and State Governments cannot impose additional qualifications under Article 309 or State laws.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Drug Inspector qualifications State vs Central legislative power Article 309 Constitution

DINESH BIWAJI ASHTIKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

13 Jan 2026 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ATUL S. CHANDURKAR · 2026 INSC 56
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court emphasized the constitutional mandate and statutory obligation under Section 12 of the RTE Act to admit 25% disadvantaged children in neighbourhood schools, directing enforceable rules for effective implementation and judicial oversight.

constitutional other Significant Right to Education Section 12 RTE Act 25% reservation Weaker and disadvantaged sections

Dr. Anand Rai v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

13 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 141

The Supreme Court quashed charges under the SCST Act against the accused due to lack of prima facie evidence of caste-based knowledge or intent and remitted the matter for trial on other charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 framing of charges Section 227 CrPC Section 14-A SCST Act

Alka Shrirang Chavan & Anr v. Hemchandra Rajaram Bhonsale & Ors

12 Jan 2026 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 52
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the executability of a specific performance decree and held that subsequent purchasers pendente lite cannot claim independent title or obstruct execution under the doctrine of lis pendens.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant doctrine of lis pendens Section 52 Transfer of Property Act specific performance execution of decree

Kishorilal v. Gopal

12 Jan 2026 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 48
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an appeal in a suit for specific performance does not abate on non-substitution of one legal heir if the deceased vendor's interest is sufficiently represented by other heirs or purchasers, and set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appeal as abated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance abatement legal representatives vendor as necessary party

State of U.P. v. Dinesh Kumar

12 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 49

The Supreme Court upheld cancellation of a government appointment due to deliberate non-disclosure of pending criminal cases despite clear disclaimers, emphasizing integrity and public trust in recruitment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant non-disclosure criminal antecedents government employment appointment cancellation

ANSAL CROWN HEIGHTS FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION v. M/S ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.

12 Jan 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 51

The Supreme Court held that execution of consumer protection orders must be confined to the judgment debtor company and cannot be extended to its directors/promoters absent adjudicated liability, despite the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution proceedings consumer protection directors liability corporate veil

Pogadadabnda Revathi & Anr. v. The State of Telangana

09 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 75

The Supreme Court held that police custody cannot be granted to accused persons already on bail without first cancelling the bail order, setting aside orders granting police custody months after bail was granted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police custody bail cancellation of bail Magistrate discretion

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anurudh & Anr

09 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 47
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its bail jurisdiction by mandating medical age determination at investigation stage in POCSO cases, clarifying the proper legal framework for age determination and bail under the POCSO and Juvenile Justice Acts.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail jurisdiction Section 439 CrPC POCSO Act medical age determination

X v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 44
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s bail order in a serious POCSO case involving gang rape of a minor, emphasizing the gravity of offences, victim protection, and the need for fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim

M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

09 Jan 2026 · J.B. PARDIWALA; R. MAHADEVAN · 2026 INSC 46

The Supreme Court held that substitution of shares in amalgamation, when held as stock-in-trade, constitutes taxable business income under Section 28 of the Income Tax Act, and the High Court did not exceed its jurisdiction in remanding the matter for determination of the nature of holding.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Amalgamation Stock-in-trade Capital assets Section 28 Income Tax Act