Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Tuticorin Port Trust

07 Jan 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Pankaj Mithal · 2026 INSC 34

The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 cannot re-interpret contract clauses or disturb arbitral awards upheld under Section 34, restoring compensation for idle time of a Backhoe Dredger under the License Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda

07 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 33

The Supreme Court upheld the CLB's power to condone delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 by applying principles of the Limitation Act, 1963, and allowed retrospective application of Section 433 to pending proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Company Law Board Limitation Act, 1963 condonation of delay

MD Imran @ D.C. Guddu v. The State of Jharkhand

07 Jan 2026 · J B Pardiwala; K.V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 36

The Supreme Court clarified the higher threshold of evidence required for bail of accused added under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and allowed bail to MD Imran @ D.C. Guddu while dismissing the State's appeal against anticipatory bail of co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. bail test added accused strong and cogent evidence

Sumit v. State of U P & Anr.

07 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 145

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC continues beyond filing of charge sheet unless special reasons exist, setting aside the High Court's order restricting bail duration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC charge sheet cognizance

Arvind Dham v. Directorate of Enforcement

06 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 12

The Supreme Court allowed bail to the appellant in a PMLA case, holding that prolonged pretrial detention without trial commencement violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21, especially where investigation is complete and evidence is documentary.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Article 21 speedy trial

Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. M/s Welkin Foods

06 Jan 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 19

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of imported aluminium shelving as parts of agricultural machinery under CTI 84369900, allowing the appeal of the importer and dismissing the customs department's challenge.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs classification General Rules of Interpretation Common parlance test End use in classification

S. Nagesh v. Shobha S. Aradhya

06 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 27

The Supreme Court held that cognizance under Section 138 NI Act cannot be taken before condoning delay in filing the complaint, quashing the complaint filed without prior condonation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 142 NI Act Cognizance

GOLDEN FOOD PRODUCTS INDIA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

06 Jan 2026 · B.V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 22
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a statutory authority cannot arbitrarily cancel the highest valid bid in a public auction without relevant reasons or notice, and directed allotment to the highest bidder whose bid exceeded the reserve price.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public auction arbitrary cancellation principles of natural justice Article 14

Prasanna Kasini v. The State of Telangana & Anr.

06 Jan 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 30

The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte transfer of criminal proceedings based on unsubstantiated allegations of bias due to relatives working in court and police, emphasizing the need for proper hearing and cogent evidence before ordering transfer.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant transfer petition alleged bias ex parte order criminal proceedings

Gurupada Bera v. Binod Kumar

06 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 20

The Supreme Court disposed of contempt petitions alleging non-compliance with salary payment directions to part-time teachers by granting liberty to submit fresh representations and directing a reasoned hearing and order within a fixed timeframe.

administrative other Significant contempt petition non-compliance opportunity of hearing salary arrears

KADIRKHAN AHMEDKHAN PATHAN v. MAHARASHTRA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

06 Jan 2026 · J. K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 16

The Supreme Court held that departmental proceedings cannot be instituted or continued against a retired employee without specific regulatory authority and prior government sanction, quashing the enquiry and directing release of retiral benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry superannuation retiral benefits Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation

Pratima Das v. State of Himachal Pradesh

06 Jan 2026 · Vikram Nath; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 13
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court directed Manav Bharti University to issue academic documents to a bona fide student despite clerical errors in admission records, emphasizing protection of student rights against administrative lapses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant academic documents clerical error bona fide student university records

UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v. Electrosteel Castings Limited

06 Jan 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 14

The Supreme Court held that a promoter's obligation to arrange fund infusion does not constitute a contract of guarantee under Indian law, and approval of a resolution plan extinguishes debt only against the corporate debtor, not third-party guarantors.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant contract of guarantee Section 126 Indian Contract Act Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 resolution plan

S. Shakul Hameed v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited

06 Jan 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 29
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by treating it under Section 166, estimating reasonable income, and maintaining the disability assessment at 50%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 163A Section 166 compensation

IFGL REFRACTORIES LTD. v. ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

06 Jan 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 18

The Supreme Court held that the MM Plant unit qualifies as a new industrial unit under the Orissa Industrial Policy of 1989 and is entitled to capital investment and DG Set subsidies despite prior subsidies availed by the amalgamated entities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant new industrial unit capital investment subsidy DG Set subsidy industrial policy of 1989

Union of India v. G. Kiran & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 15
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

A reserved category candidate who avails relaxation at any stage of the examination cannot claim allocation against unreserved vacancies despite higher final merit, affirming strict adherence to reservation rules in cadre allocation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reserved category relaxation Preliminary Examination Indian Forest Service

Jaswinder Singh @ Shinder Singh v. State of Punjab

06 Jan 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 23

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant accused of double murder due to lack of direct evidence and fatal omissions in initial police statements, holding that mere driving of the vehicle used in the crime does not establish guilt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double murder driver liability Section 161 CrPC Section 319 CrPC

Smt. Shalini Bhateja & Anr. v. The State of U.P. & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 28

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR, directed bail for the accused, and closed redundant proceedings, affirming that FIRs cannot be quashed merely on mala fide allegations once chargesheet is filed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant FIR quashing mala fide registration civil dispute vs criminal offence chargesheet

Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia v. State of Gujarat

06 Jan 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 21

The Supreme Court held that without mandatory notice under Section 10(5) of the ULC Act to actual possessors, possession does not transfer to the State, and proceedings abate under the Repealing Act, entitling appellants to retain possession.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976 Section 10(5) notice vesting vs possession de jure possession

Abhay Kumar Patel & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 24
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that retrospective amendments altering recruitment eligibility criteria after the commencement of the process and publication of provisional merit lists are impermissible, directing finalization of appointments under the original rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant retrospective amendment recruitment rules weightage for contractual experience legitimate expectation