Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

GLS Films Industries Private Limited v. Chemical Suppliers India Private Limited

09 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 344

The Supreme Court held that a plausible pre-existing dispute prior to the demand notice bars admission of a Section 9 insolvency application, restoring the NCLT order dismissing the application and setting aside the NCLAT judgment.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 9 application pre-existing dispute demand notice

Channappa v. Parvatewwa

09 Apr 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 343
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit for relief omitted in an earlier suit arising from the same cause of action is barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC and set aside the High Court's interference with concurrent findings dismissing the suit on res judicata grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order II Rule 2 CPC Section 11 CPC Section 100 CPC

K.G. SESHADRI v. THE TRUSTEES OF STATE BANK OF INDIA

08 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N.V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 333

The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not entitled to pension benefits under SBI Pension Fund Rules due to failure to meet eligibility criteria and dismissed the appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant pension entitlement State Bank of India Pension Fund Rules voluntary retirement voluntary abandonment

Hem Raj v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

08 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 332

The Supreme Court held that separate convictions and concurrent sentences under Sections 20, 25, and 29 of the NDPS Act are permissible, but fines imposed must run concurrently, not cumulatively.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) Section 25 Section 29

M/S CHOPRA HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. HARBINDER SINGH SEKHON & ORS.

08 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 335

The Supreme Court held that a party materially affected by an interim order in writ proceedings is entitled to impleadment and opportunity to seek clarification, setting aside the High Court's refusal and directing independent adjudication of related proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant impleadment interim order Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025 writ petition

Renuka v. State of Maharashtra

07 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 327
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can only be rebutted at trial, and dismissed complaints under Section 138 cannot be quashed at the pre-trial stage on the ground of no legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Dishonoured cheque Legally enforceable debt

Saroj Pandey v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

07 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 324

The Supreme Court held that mere directorship and signing Board Resolutions do not establish liability under Section 141 NI Act, and quashed proceedings against a Director for lack of specific averment of responsibility and improper exercise of inherent jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Director liability

XXX v. YYY

07 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 334

The Supreme Court dissolved a long-standing acrimonious marriage under Article 142, quashed all pending proceedings between the parties, granted custody to the wife, and directed the husband to pay Rs. 5 Crores as permanent alimony and maintenance.

family appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution of India irretrievable breakdown of marriage permanent alimony maintenance arrears

State Bank of India v. Amit Iron Private Limited & Ors.

07 Apr 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 323
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that banks must grant borrowers a personal hearing and disclose relevant forensic audit findings before classifying loan accounts as fraud under RBI Master Directions, upholding natural justice principles.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant natural justice audi alteram partem personal hearing fraud classification

The West Bengal State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. v. Dipendu Biswas

07 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 330
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that vacancies reserved for PWD-LV under the Unreserved category must be filled on merit by any PWD-LV candidate from any social category, allowing reservation migration and emphasizing merit over category exclusivity.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Unreserved category Horizontal reservation Persons with Disability Low Vision Merit-based appointment

Bikram Chand Rana v. Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation

07 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 326

The Supreme Court held that gratuity under Rule 69(1)(c) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 cannot be paid until both departmental and judicial proceedings against a government servant conclude, dismissing the appeal challenging withholding of gratuity during pendency.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Rule 69(1)(c) gratuity withholding departmental proceedings

UCO BANK & ORS. v. SK SHRIVASTAVA

07 Apr 2026 · J.K. MAHESHWARI; VIJAY BISHNOI · 2026 INSC 328
Cites 7 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a voluntary retirement notice not refused within the prescribed period is deemed accepted, invalidating disciplinary action initiated thereafter and entitling the employee to post-retiral benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant voluntary retirement UCO Bank Pension Regulations Service Regulations show cause notice

Gautam Satnami v. State of Chhattisgarh

07 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 325

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last-seen evidence Section 302 IPC Section 27 Evidence Act

Sivakumar v. State

06 Apr 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 318

The Supreme Court set aside obscenity convictions and common intention culpable homicide conviction of one appellant while upholding culpable homicide conviction of the other, reducing sentences considering the incident's circumstances.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 294(b) IPC obscenity culpable homicide Section 304 Part II IPC

Jay Prakash Yadav v. State of Jharkhand

06 Apr 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 317

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to insufficient and unreliable circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence excluding all reasonable doubt in criminal convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence identification voice recognition benefit of doubt

Juvenile Delinquent v. State of U.P.

06 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 387

The Supreme Court held that a juvenile declared under the JJ Act cannot be tried or detained as an adult without proper statutory procedure and ordered release on bail, emphasizing rehabilitative treatment and systemic reforms.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenile delinquent heinous offence bail

S. Balagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu

06 Apr 2026 · Pamidigantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 319

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a surgeon for performing orchidectomy without specific consent, holding that the procedure was medically appropriate and the consent form was not tampered with, thus preventing abuse of court process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence consent for surgery orchidectomy interpolation of consent form

M/S. PIAGGIO VEHICLES PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

06 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 321

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful cancellation of an industrial lease due to the lessee's failure to comply with construction and operational timelines, rejecting claims for extension and restoration despite government electric vehicle policies.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant industrial lease lease cancellation extension of time industrial development authority

Sajal Bose v. State of West Bengal

06 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 322

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants where unimpeachable CCTV evidence negated allegations, holding that continuation would be an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings CCTV evidence mala fide prosecution

Save Mon Region Federation v. The State of Arunachal Pradesh

06 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 320
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed a CBI investigation into alleged arbitrary and non-transparent award of public works contracts in Arunachal Pradesh involving high-ranking officials, emphasizing constitutional standards of fairness and transparency in public procurement.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant public procurement Article 14 independent investigation CBI