Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

S. Rajendran v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Benami Prohibition)

24 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 187
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that challenges to attachment orders under the Benami Act cannot be entertained by insolvency tribunals under the IBC, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of Benami Act authorities and dismissing the appeals.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Benami Property Transactions Act Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code NCLT jurisdiction Moratorium under IBC

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Kanika & Ors.

24 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 188
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be reduced by amounts equivalent to pay and allowances received under the 2006 Rules to avoid double recovery, and that a High Court cannot alter substantive compensation via clarification applications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules, 2006 compensation deduction double recovery

Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd. v. Ecstasy Realty Pvt. Ltd.

24 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 186
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that an insolvency petition under Section 7 of the IBC must be admitted upon proof of default in financial debt, and that unilateral restructuring without prescribed consent does not prevent default or bind all debenture holders.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 Debenture Trust Deed Financial debt

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited and Ors.

24 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 208
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the insurer of the truck is liable for the claimant's injury as the truck driver negligently failed to maintain a safe distance from the trailer, reversing the High Court's order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance liability motor vehicle accident negligence safe distance

Sitaram Kuchhbedia v. Vimal Rana

23 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 178
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, holding that multiple grievous injuries inflicted by an unlawful assembly with intent to cause death attract the offence of murder and vicarious liability applies to all members.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC Section 149 IPC murder

Shobha Namdev Sonavane v. Samadhan Bajirao Sonvane

23 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 181
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to accused in a murder and SC/ST atrocity case, holding that members of an unlawful assembly are equally liable and bail cannot be granted on extraneous grounds such as pending civil disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail unlawful assembly Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act murder

Naresh Kumar Garg v. State of Haryana

23 Feb 2026 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 176

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of complaint proceedings under the PCPNDT Act against a radiologist, emphasizing strict enforcement of record-keeping and procedural compliance to prevent female foeticide.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant PCPNDT Act sex determination Form F District Appropriate Authority

Amad Noormamad Bakali v. State of Gujarat

23 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 180
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under the Customs Act based on voluntary confessional statements corroborated by independent evidence but reduced sentences considering the appellants' age and time served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 108 Customs Act Section 135 Customs Act confessional statement corroborative evidence

Neelu @ Nilesh Koshti v. State of Madhya Pradesh

20 Feb 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 173

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including recovery of the body at the accused's instance under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and credible identification despite decomposition.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Indian Evidence Act murder conviction identification of deceased

Sriganesh Chandrasekaran & Others v. M/S Unishire Homes LLP & Others

20 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 172

The Supreme Court held that landowners are not jointly liable with the developer for delay compensation in a real estate project under a Joint Development Agreement but must transfer title along with the developer.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Joint Development Agreement General Power of Attorney deficiency in service delay compensation

Union of India v. Sistema Shyam Teleservices Limited

20 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 174

The Supreme Court held that telecom licensees continuing operations after quashing of their licences are liable to pay the reserve price from the date of quashing, with interest payable only from the expiry of the show-cause notice period.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant 2G spectrum allocation Unified Access Service licence reserve price liability Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Mohit Khirbat

20 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 170
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's orders directing the developer to deliver possession with Occupancy Certificate and pay compensation for delay, holding that statutory consumer rights override unfair contractual limitations.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deficiency in service housing construction delay in possession

Gourab Mondal @ Shanu & Another v. State of West Bengal

18 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 184
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's sentence from life imprisonment without remission till natural life to life imprisonment for twenty years without remission, balancing punishment severity with the possibility of reformation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty life imprisonment remission common intention

Priyanka Kumari and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.

18 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 167

The Supreme Court held that degrees awarded by a university established under a statute later declared ultra vires are valid if obtained prior to invalidation, and terminated employees on this ground are entitled to reinstatement without back wages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ultra vires degree recognition private university termination of service

Power Trust v. Bhuvan Madan

18 Feb 2026 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 166

The Supreme Court upheld the admission of CIRP against Hiranmaye Energy Ltd., holding that restructuring proposals failing pre-implementation conditions do not bar insolvency proceedings and that the Adjudicating Authority's role at admission is limited to verifying default without assessing viability.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 application Section 10A moratorium Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Haryana and Ors.

17 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 163
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that allotments of housing flats by a government employees' welfare society must comply with eligibility criteria and principles of fairness, setting aside arbitrary preferential allotments and directing a fresh draw.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Societies Registration Act, 1860 Article 226 jurisdiction Preferential allotment Fiduciary duty

Parameshwari v. State of Tamil Nadu

17 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 164
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reduction of sentence in a grievous injury case, affirming that compensation cannot substitute appropriate punishment and sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sentence reduction proportionality in sentencing compensation to victim Section 307 IPC

Rohit Jangde v. The State of Chhattisgarh

17 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 162
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of a stepfather for his stepdaughter's murder due to flawed investigation, inadmissible Section 27 statement, incomplete DNA evidence, and failure to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Indian Evidence Act last seen together theory DNA evidence

Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy v. State C.B.I.

17 Feb 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Manmohan · 2026 INSC 160

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for abetment of suicide and attempt to commit suicide, ruling death was due to poisoning and rejecting claims of manual strangulation or sexual assault.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide organophosphate poisoning postmortem report manual strangulation

P. Suresh v. D. Kalaivani & Ors.

16 Feb 2026 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 121

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to strike off a plaint when a specific remedy under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is available, and set aside the High Court's order striking the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order VI Rule 16 CPC supervisory jurisdiction