Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

Mehmood Pracha v. Central Administrative Tribunal

10 Aug 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that a contemnor denying charges under Section 14 of the Contempt of Courts Act is entitled to a trial and evidence, and quashed the conviction by the Central Administrative Tribunal for failure to conduct such trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court Central Administrative Tribunal Section 14 Contempt of Courts Act right to trial

Janabai v. M/s. I.C.I.C.I. Lambord Insurance Company Ltd.

10 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the deceased's legal heirs, reinstated and enhanced the motor accident compensation award, holding that liability and compensation must be assessed on summary evidence under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation motor accident claim

Janabai v. M/S. I.C.I.C.I. Lambord Insurance Company Ltd.

10 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath · (2022) 11 SCC 123
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the deceased's heirs, reinstated and enhanced the motor accident compensation award, clarifying evidentiary standards and compensation heads under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Compensation

Khema @ Khem Chandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

10 Aug 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to unreliable witness testimonies, doubtful recoveries, and prosecutorial lapses, emphasizing the need for corroboration and careful scrutiny of interested witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant injured witness ocular testimony corroboration Section 27 Evidence Act

Ramabora @ Ramaboraiah v. State of Karnataka

10 Aug 2022 · Indira Banerjee; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction of two accused for murder due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, restoring their acquittal by the Sessions Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Acquittal Unlawful assembly Falsus in uno falsus in omnibus

Ramabora @ Ramaboraiah v. State of Karnataka

10 Aug 2022 · Indira Banerjee; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction of two accused due to lack of proof of foundational offences and contradictions in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for cogent reasons to overturn acquittals.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly common object falsus in uno falsus in omnibus

Gajubha Jadeja Jesar v. Union of India

10 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the NGT's grant of a one-year grace period for cold rolled steel units to obtain Environmental Clearance amid prior ambiguity in the EIA Notification, quashing the closure order against the Project Proponent.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance EIA Notification 2006 National Green Tribunal Section 21 NGT Act

Gajubha Jadeja Jesar v. Union of India

10 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the NGT's grant of a one-year period for steel re-rolling units operating under CTE/CTO to obtain Environmental Clearance amid ambiguity in the EIA Notification, quashing the closure notice against the Project Proponent.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance EIA Notification 2006 National Green Tribunal Section 21 NGT Act

Budhiyarin Bai v. State of Chattisgarh

10 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 815

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of an illiterate senior citizen under the NDPS Act but reduced her sentence considering her personal circumstances and failure of the trial court to apply sentencing principles under Section 32B.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) sentence modification senior citizen accused

Union of India & Ors. v. Gopal Meena & Ors.

10 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that separate zones of consideration for SC/ST candidates in regular promotions are not legally sustainable and upheld the existing Office Memorandum governing promotion procedures.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant zone of consideration Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe promotion

Budhiyarin Bai v. State of Chattisgarh

10 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under the NDPS Act but reduced her sentence from 15 to 12 years considering her age, illiteracy, and lack of criminal history.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) sentence reduction commercial quantity

Arun Bhatiya v. HDFC Bank

08 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna · 2022 INSC 804

The Supreme Court held that a consumer complaint against a bank for deficiency of service in handling a joint fixed deposit is maintainable and must be adjudicated on merits by the Consumer Fora.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deficiency of service joint fixed deposit banking services

Varsha Garg v. State of Madhya Pradesh

08 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; AS Bopanna · 2022 INSC 807

The Supreme Court held that the trial court must exercise its broad powers under Section 311 CrPC to summon decoding registers and witnesses essential for a just decision, allowing the prosecution's application despite closure of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 CrPC decoding register call detail records summoning witnesses

Varsha Garg v. State of Madhya Pradesh

08 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; AS Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in rejecting the prosecution's application under Section 311 CrPC to summon decoding registers and witnesses essential for a just decision, allowing the appeal and directing the trial to conclude expeditiously.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 CrPC decoding register call detail records summoning witnesses

Pillamma v. M. Ramaiah Reddy

08 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, ruling that failure under the Inams Abolition Act, 1954 does not bar tenancy claims based on possession as of the vesting date.

property appeal_dismissed Significant occupancy rights Karnataka Land Reforms Act 1961 Inams Abolition Act 1954 vesting date

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohd Rehan Khan

08 Aug 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that failure to fulfill prescribed conditions in compassionate appointment rules justifies termination and courts cannot direct appointment to alternate posts beyond the rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment typing test termination of service Article 16 of Constitution

Pillamma v. M. Ramaiah Reddy

08 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, ruling that failure to establish tenancy under the Inams Abolition Act, 1954 does not bar claims based on possession on the vesting date.

property appeal_dismissed Significant occupancy rights Karnataka Land Reforms Act 1961 Inams Abolition Act 1954 vesting date

Uttar Pradesh State v. Mohammad Rehan Khan

08 Aug 2022 · Dr. Nanjay Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful termination of a compassionate appointee for failure to meet mandatory typing test requirements under statutory rules, clarifying the scope and conditions of compassionate appointments under the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (During Service Death) Rules, 2014.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment typing test Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (During Service Death) Rules, 2014 Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution

Sau Rajani v. Sau Smita

08 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain suits for removal of unauthorized construction affecting individual rights on Authority premises despite statutory bars under the MHADA Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil court jurisdiction bar of jurisdiction Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act unauthorized construction

Sau Rajani v. Sau Smita

08 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain suits for removal of unauthorized construction and protection of easements despite statutory eviction powers vested in the Maharashtra Housing Authority, and set aside the High Court's bar of jurisdiction ruling.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil court jurisdiction Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 Section 71 bar Section 177 bar