Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

RAJESWARI CHANDRASEKAR GANESH v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

14 Jul 2022 · A.M. KHANWILKAR; J.B. PARDIWALA

The Supreme Court held that in a writ petition for Habeas Corpus involving child custody, the paramount consideration is the welfare of the minor children, and unlawful custody violating foreign court orders can be remedied by directing their return to the lawful guardian.

family appeal_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus child custody writ petition welfare of child

Amarendra Kumar Pandey v. Union of India

14 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that discharge from Assam Rifles on four Red Ink entries is discretionary and must be preceded by application of mind and procedural fairness, setting aside the appellant's discharge and granting pension benefits continuity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Assam Rifles Red Ink entries Discharge from service Subjective satisfaction

Amarendra Kumar Pandey v. Union of India

14 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that discharge from Assam Rifles after four Red Ink entries is discretionary and must be based on due application of mind with procedural safeguards, setting aside the appellant's discharge and granting pension benefits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Assam Rifles Red Ink entries Discharge from service Discretionary power

Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai v. State of Bihar

14 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that an admitted appeal against conviction cannot be dismissed solely because the appellant absconded and must be heard on merits, setting aside the High Court's dismissal for non-prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against conviction absconding appellant dismissal for non-prosecution Section 374(2) CrPC

Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai v. State of Bihar

14 Jul 2022 · Abhay S. Oka; M.M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that an admitted appeal against conviction cannot be dismissed merely because the appellant absconded and must be heard on merits, setting aside the High Court's dismissal and remanding the appeal for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against conviction absconding accused dismissal for non-prosecution Section 374(2) CrPC

L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited v. Union of India

14 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2022 INSC 726

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of interlocutory civil appeals pending against NCLAT orders after final orders were passed, vacating interim orders accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural interlocutory appeal withdrawal of appeal National Company Law Appellate Tribunal final order

L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of interlocutory civil appeals after final orders by the NCLAT, vacating interim orders and disposing the appeals as withdrawn.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural withdrawal of appeal interlocutory order National Company Law Appellate Tribunal final order

Shahaja @ Shahajan Ismail Mohd. Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

14 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on credible ocular evidence and clarified the proper legal approach to discovery panchnama under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Article 136 Constitution of India Section 302 IPC Section 27 Evidence Act Section 8 Evidence Act

Shahaja @ Shahajan Ismail Mohd. Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

14 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on reliable eye witness evidence and clarified the limited evidentiary value of discovery panchnama under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 27 Evidence Act Section 8 Evidence Act eye witness testimony

Barun Chandra Thakur v. Master Bholu

13 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court upheld the Juvenile Justice Board’s preliminary assessment that a juvenile aged over 16 accused of a heinous offence should be tried as an adult, emphasizing procedural fairness and limiting High Court’s revisional scope.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act 2015 Preliminary assessment Heinous offence Trial as adult

Sarju Mishra v. Jangi

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the consolidation authorities' equitable distribution of partition shares where the Civil Court decree did not conclusively determine survivorship and share entitlement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition decree preliminary decree U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 survivorship

Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation) & Ors. v. Laljibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of search authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing limited judicial review of the Revenue's bona fide reasons to believe and rejecting the High Court's quashing of the search.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 132 Income Tax Act reason to believe search and seizure judicial review

M/s THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. SHASHIKALA J. AYACHI

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian · 2022 INSC 718
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court allowed the insurer's appeal, holding that delay in repudiation alone does not establish deficiency in service and that the consumer forum erred in allowing the marine insurance claim without sufficient evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant marine insurance insurance claim repudiation consumer protection deficiency in service

M/s THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. SHASHIKALA J. AYACHI

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that delay in repudiation alone does not establish insurer's deficiency in service and set aside the consumer forum's order allowing a marine insurance claim based on contradictory and doubtful evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant marine insurance deficiency in service insurance claim repudiation consumer protection

Swami Samarth Sugars and Agro Industries Ltd. v. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil Dnyaneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that litigation delays justify extension of time for implementing a sugar factory project under the Sugarcane Control Order, and that the IEM does not lapse automatically without forfeiture of performance guarantee after due hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum Sugarcane Control Order Extension of time Aerial distance

Swami Samarth Sugars and Agro Industries Ltd. v. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil Dnyaneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that litigation-induced delays justify extension of time for implementing an Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum under the Sugarcane Control Order, and that derecognition requires due process, thereby restoring the appellant's rights and setting aside the High Court's cancellation of extensions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum Sugarcane Control Order Aerial Distance Certificate Extension of time

Jarnail Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to failure of prosecution to prove recovery and admissibility of key evidence, emphasizing strict proof requirements for criminal convictions.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant recovery of evidence secondary evidence enquiry report admissibility proof beyond reasonable doubt

Jarnail Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 15

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to failure of prosecution to prove recovery and admissibility of critical evidence, emphasizing strict adherence to evidentiary rules in criminal convictions.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant recovery of evidence secondary evidence enquiry report admissibility proof beyond reasonable doubt

Sadhna Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's anticipatory bail granted to a police officer accused of sexual exploitation and non-cooperation in investigation, emphasizing strict scrutiny in bail matters involving serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC sexual exploitation police officer accused

Sadhna Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted to a police officer accused of sexual assault and non-cooperation in investigation, emphasizing strict scrutiny and discretionary refusal of bail in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC sexual assault police officer misconduct