Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation) & Ors. v. Laljibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of search authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing limited judicial review of the Revenue's bona fide reasons to believe and rejecting the High Court's quashing of the search.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 132 Income Tax Act reason to believe search and seizure judicial review

M/s THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. SHASHIKALA J. AYACHI

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian · 2022 INSC 718
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court allowed the insurer's appeal, holding that delay in repudiation alone does not establish deficiency in service and that the consumer forum erred in allowing the marine insurance claim without sufficient evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant marine insurance insurance claim repudiation consumer protection deficiency in service

M/s THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. SHASHIKALA J. AYACHI

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that delay in repudiation alone does not establish insurer's deficiency in service and set aside the consumer forum's order allowing a marine insurance claim based on contradictory and doubtful evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant marine insurance deficiency in service insurance claim repudiation consumer protection

Swami Samarth Sugars and Agro Industries Ltd. v. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil Dnyaneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that litigation delays justify extension of time for implementing a sugar factory project under the Sugarcane Control Order, and that the IEM does not lapse automatically without forfeiture of performance guarantee after due hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum Sugarcane Control Order Extension of time Aerial distance

Swami Samarth Sugars and Agro Industries Ltd. v. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil Dnyaneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

13 Jul 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that litigation-induced delays justify extension of time for implementing an Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum under the Sugarcane Control Order, and that derecognition requires due process, thereby restoring the appellant's rights and setting aside the High Court's cancellation of extensions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum Sugarcane Control Order Aerial Distance Certificate Extension of time

Jarnail Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to failure of prosecution to prove recovery and admissibility of key evidence, emphasizing strict proof requirements for criminal convictions.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant recovery of evidence secondary evidence enquiry report admissibility proof beyond reasonable doubt

Jarnail Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to failure of prosecution to prove recovery and admissibility of critical evidence, emphasizing strict adherence to evidentiary rules in criminal convictions.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant recovery of evidence secondary evidence enquiry report admissibility proof beyond reasonable doubt

Sadhna Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's anticipatory bail granted to a police officer accused of sexual exploitation and non-cooperation in investigation, emphasizing strict scrutiny in bail matters involving serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC sexual exploitation police officer accused

Sadhna Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside anticipatory bail granted to a police officer accused of sexual assault and non-cooperation in investigation, emphasizing strict scrutiny and discretionary refusal of bail in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC sexual assault police officer misconduct

Ajmal v. State of Kerala

12 Jul 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from murder under section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304 Part II IPC, upholding other convictions and ordering release of appellants after time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide murder section 302 IPC section 304 IPC

Farooqi Begum v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 Jul 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's dismissal of the second appeal, and remanded the case for fresh consideration of possession and resumption evidence in a land dispute involving a rent-free grant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant resumption of grant continuous possession burden of proof secondary evidence

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Anand Engineering College

12 Jul 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that the Forest Department cannot impose damages directly under Section 33 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act without due process and natural justice, and set aside a Rs. 10 crore damages order against an educational institution discharging effluent into a wildlife sanctuary.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 33 Environmental Protection Damages

ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. v. ALOK KUMAR LODHA

12 Jul 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that licensees cannot amend suits to challenge pre-existing mortgages and implead mortgagee banks, as such amendments change the nature of the suit and cause misjoinder, and allowed the appeals setting aside the High Court's order permitting such amendments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Order 1 Rule 10 CPC amendment of plaint impleadment of parties

U.N. Krishnamurthy v. A. M. Krishnamurthy

12 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations disentitles a plaintiff from specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act agreement for sale

Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited

12 Jul 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Adjudicating Authority has discretionary power under Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC to admit or reject CIRP applications by financial creditors, allowing consideration of the corporate debtor's overall viability and pending favorable orders before admission.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7(5)(a) Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Financial Creditor

Malti Sahu v. Rahul

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that the prosecution proved the complete chain of circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the double murder beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances

Malti Sahu v. Rahul

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the conviction under Section 302 IPC by holding that the prosecution proved the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, reversing the High Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Amritsar v. M/s D.L. Steels

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that dried pomegranate seeds ('anardana') are correctly classified under tariff Heading 1209 as seeds, not under Heading 0813 for dried fruits, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for higher customs duty.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Harmonised System of Nomenclature General Rules of Interpretation Classification of goods

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Amritsar v. M/s D.L. Steels

11 Jul 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that dried pomegranate seeds ('anardana') are correctly classified under Heading 1209 as seeds used for sowing, not as dried fruit under Heading 0813, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for higher customs duty.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Harmonised System of Nomenclature Classification of goods Dried pomegranate seeds

Amrik Singh v. The State of Punjab

11 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused due to unsafe in-court identification without prior TIP and failure to prove recovery of stolen property, setting aside convictions under Sections 302 and 392 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identification of accused test identification parade in-court identification recovery of stolen property