Supreme Court of India

17,536 judgments

Year:

Sumitha Pradeep v. Arun Kumar C.K

25 Jul 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail in a serious POCSO sexual assault case, emphasizing the primacy of prima facie evidence and statutory presumption over custodial interrogation considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO sexual assault minor

Prabha Tyagi v. Kamlesh Devi

23 Jul 2022 · B.V. Nagarathna; M.R. Shah · 2022 INSC 563
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a woman who has at any time lived in a shared household with the respondent is entitled to protection under the Domestic Violence Act, and a Domestic Incident Report is not mandatory when the aggrieved person files an application directly.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Domestic Incident Report Shared household Domestic relationship

General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

22 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act, only the court where the first application was filed has jurisdiction over subsequent arbitration applications, quashing the Orissa High Court's appointment of an arbitrator for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 42 jurisdiction Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator Section 9 interim relief

General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

22 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act, only the Court where the first application was filed has jurisdiction over subsequent arbitration applications, quashing the Orissa High Court's appointment of an arbitrator for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 42 jurisdiction Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator Section 9 interim relief

Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.

22 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that junior resident doctors serving under bond in ESIC institutions are not 'in-service' doctors eligible for reservation in postgraduate medical courses, dismissing their writ petition seeking such inclusion.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Employees State Insurance Corporation Junior Resident Doctors In-service doctors Reservation in postgraduate medical courses

Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors.

22 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that junior resident doctors serving under bond in ESIC institutions are not 'in-service' doctors eligible for reservation in postgraduate medical courses reserved for permanent ESIC medical officers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant junior resident doctors in-service doctors reservation postgraduate medical education

Narinder Singh v. Divesh Bhutani

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that lands notified under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and recorded as forest in government records are forest lands under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, requiring prior Central Government approval for non-forest use.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Indian Forest Act, 1927 forest land definition

Narinder Singh v. Divesh Bhutani

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that lands notified under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and recorded as forest in government records qualify as forest lands under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, requiring prior Central Government approval for non-forest use.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Indian Forest Act, 1927 forest land definition

The Khasgi (Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore v. Vipin Dhanaitkar

21 Jul 2022 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Abhay S. Oka; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld that the Khasgi Trust properties vested in the State Government and that unauthorized alienations by Trustees without prior sanction under the Public Trusts Act are void, dismissing the Trust's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Khasgi Trust Public Trusts Act, 1951 alienation of trust property Article XII Covenant

X v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Anr

21 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancy up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, affirming reproductive autonomy and interpreting Rule 3B purposively to include them.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B MTP Rules 2003 unmarried women reproductive autonomy

X v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Anr

21 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancy up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, affirming reproductive rights as part of personal liberty under Article 21 and striking down exclusionary interpretation of Rule 3B.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Rule 3B MTP Rules 2003 unmarried women termination of pregnancy

R. KRSNA MURTII v. R. R. JAGADESAN

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 741

The Supreme Court held that a legal heir and registered Will beneficiary is entitled to be substituted as legal representative of a deceased plaintiff without outright dismissal of the application for non-impleadment of other heirs, mandating procedural inquiry under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant substitution of legal representative registered Will legal heir Order XXII Rule 5 CPC

R. KRSNA MURTII v. R. R. JAGADESAN

21 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that a legal heir claiming substitution as legal representative under a registered Will cannot be summarily rejected without inquiry under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC and restored the substitution application for reconsideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant substitution of legal representative Order XXII Rule 5 CPC registered Will legal heirs

Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers

21 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed completion of registration of unorganized migrant workers to ensure delivery of welfare benefits and mandated reconsideration of food security coverage beyond the 2011 census to uphold the fundamental right to food.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant migrant labourers unorganized workers National Database for Unorganised Workers eShram portal

Rameshwar v. State of Haryana

21 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi... · 2022 INSC 738

The Supreme Court held that collaboration agreements granting possession and development rights during the suspect period constitute 'transfer' of land, invalidated such transfers, and upheld the deemed award vesting lands in the State authority.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition collaboration agreement development agreement transfer of land

Rameshwar v. State of Haryana

21 Jul 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi... · (2018) 6 SCC 215

The Supreme Court held that collaboration and development agreements conferring possession and development rights during a mala fide withdrawal of land acquisition constitute transfers, subjecting such lands to deemed acquisition and vesting in the State.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition collaboration agreement development agreement transfer of immovable property

P. Ramasubbamma v. V. Vijayalakshmi

20 Jul 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's decree of specific performance where the vendor admitted the agreement and payment, and subsequent sale deeds by a power of attorney holder were held nominal and not binding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell power of attorney nominal sale deed

Topline Shoes Limited and Another v. Punjab National Bank

20 Jul 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court upheld that a counter-claim for recovery of money paid under undue influence is governed by Article 113 of the Limitation Act, dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 22 Article 113 counter-claim

Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

20 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna · 2022 INSC 736

The Supreme Court directed consolidation of multiple FIRs against a journalist for his tweets under one investigating agency, granted interim bail, and emphasized protection of freedom of speech and fair investigation to prevent abuse of criminal law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant freedom of speech multiple FIRs abuse of process interim bail

Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

20 Jul 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; A S Bopanna

The Supreme Court ordered consolidation of multiple FIRs against a journalist arising from tweets, granted interim bail, and emphasized protection against harassment and proportionality in bail conditions restricting speech.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant multiplicity of FIRs consolidation of investigation interim bail freedom of speech