Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

M.P. Medical Officers Association v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

26 Aug 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 878

The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of an unauthorized circular granting pay benefits but held that excess payments made in good faith cannot be recovered with interest, directing pay fixation and pension to be computed as per the original valid order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant government circular withdrawal pay fixation recovery of excess payment retrospective financial benefits

Sundaresh Bhatt v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

26 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; J.K. Maheshwari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code overrides the Customs Act during moratorium, prohibiting Customs Authorities from selling warehoused goods or recovering dues outside the IBC process.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Customs Act Moratorium Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

M.P. Medical Officers Association v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

26 Aug 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of an unauthorized pay fixation circular but ruled that excess payments made in good faith to medical officers cannot be recovered by the State.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant circular withdrawal pay fixation recovery of excess payment good faith benefit

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 v. Khyati Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the assessee was not entitled to claim deduction of ₹10 crores as a bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and rejected the alternative claim under Section 37.

tax appeal_allowed Significant bad debt Section 36(1)(vii) Section 36(2) Section 37

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 v. Khyati Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the assessee was not entitled to claim deduction of ₹10 crores as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the amount was capital in nature and not properly written off in accounts.

tax appeal_allowed Significant bad debt Section 36(1)(vii) Section 36(2) Section 37

Ratilal S. Pujara v. Municipal Commissioner

25 Aug 2022 · N. V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the Municipal Corporation's demolition and eviction notices for a structurally unsafe building under the MMC Act, dismissing the appellants' challenge despite a pending status quo order in a separate dispute.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Section 353B Section 354 structural audit

SRI PAL SINGH v. THE GENERAL MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. PVT. LIMITED

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition due to an unexplained and inordinate delay of 888 days in filing.

civil petition_dismissed condonation of delay review petition delay in filing explanation for delay

Ram Sharan Chaturvedi v. State of Madhya Pradesh

25 Aug 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of criminal conspiracy charges under Section 120B IPC due to lack of evidence proving agreement or overt acts, emphasizing that mere possession of one set of keys under a dual lock system is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy Section 120B IPC dual lock system circumstantial evidence

Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2022 · N. V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli · 2022 INSC 865

The Supreme Court held that the suit for specific performance was barred by limitation as time was the essence of the contract, the 2018 amendment to Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act is prospective, and the purchaser failed to prove readiness and willingness within the stipulated time.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance limitation time essence of contract Specific Relief Act 1963

Katta Sujatha Reddy v. Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2022 · N. V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that a suit for specific performance filed beyond the stipulated time is barred by limitation, the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act is prospective, and the purchaser was not entitled to specific performance due to lack of readiness and willingness.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance limitation time essence of contract Specific Relief Act, 1963

Rajhan Narendra Rout v. The State of Maharashtra

25 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing return of surrendered land and compensation to appellants after the State arbitrarily reduced their Transferable Development Rights from 100% to 4% FSI without valid justification.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transferable Development Rights Floor Space Index Development Plan Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act

Barun Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

25 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 868

The Supreme Court upheld the Commission's interpretation that Paper I of the main examination is qualifying only and merit is to be determined on total marks, setting aside the High Court's cancellation of appointments in the 6th Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Combined Civil Services Examination qualifying marks merit list Paper I qualifying paper

Barun Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

25 Aug 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that marks in the qualifying Paper-I must be included in total marks for merit list preparation under Rule 16 of the recruitment rules, restoring appointments cancelled by the High Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Combined Civil Services Examination Jharkhand Public Service Commission qualifying marks merit list preparation

Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah v. Baijiben Kabhaibhai Patanwadia

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition for lack of any error apparent on record and condoned the delay in filing the petition.

civil petition_dismissed review petition error apparent on record delay condoned Supreme Court

Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah v. Baijiben Kabhaibhai Patanwadia

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition for lack of any error apparent on the record and condoned the delay in filing the petition.

civil petition_dismissed review petition error apparent on record delay condonation Supreme Court

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another

24 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the grant of compound interest on carrying cost from the date of the Change in Law event under the restitutionary principles of the Power Purchase Agreements, dismissing the appellants' challenge to limit interest to simple interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Change in Law carrying cost compound interest Power Purchase Agreement

National Highways Authority of India v. Sheetal Jaidev Vade & Ors.

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 861

The Supreme Court held that execution of an arbitral award challenged under Section 34 must proceed through execution proceedings before the competent court, disallowing writ petitions under Article 226 for execution, and directed partial deposit and release of compensation pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Execution Article 226 Constitution Section 34 Arbitration Act National Highways Authority of India

National Highways Authority of India v. Sheetal Jaidev Vade & Ors.

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that execution of an arbitral award challenged under Section 34 must be pursued before the Executing Court and disapproved High Courts entertaining writ petitions under Article 226 for execution, directing partial deposit and conditional release of compensation pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award execution Section 34 Arbitration Act Article 226 Constitution Land acquisition compensation

Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra

24 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Surya Kant
Cites 4 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that confessions under MCOCA must be recorded by police officers not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, and confessions recorded by Additional Superintendents without statutory empowerment are inadmissible, invalidating the invocation of MCOCA in this case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act Section 18 MCOCA confession admissibility Additional Superintendent of Police

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vadodara – I v. M/s Jyoti Limited

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that erection and installation services incidental to sale of goods constitute works contracts and not consulting engineering services liable to service tax, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax consulting engineering services works contract erection and installation