Supreme Court of India

18,255 judgments

Year:

Abhishek Sharma v. The State of Jammu and Kashmir

09 Mar 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 220
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excluding employees appointed on academic arrangement basis from regularisation under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 violates Article 14, directing their inclusion upon fulfillment of statutory conditions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant regularisation academic arrangement Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 Article 14

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Adhunik Power & Natural Resource Ltd.

27 Feb 2026 · Surya Kant; B. V. Nagarathna; Joymalya Bagchi · 2026 INSC 202

The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a captive coal block and subsequent legislation constitute Change in Law events entitling compensation under a power purchase agreement, while indemnity clauses protect against coal cost escalation only prior to such events.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Change in Law Power Purchase Agreement Captive Coal Block Coal Mines (Special Provision) Act, 2015

Arjun & Anr. v. Mukesh & Ors.

27 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 227

The Supreme Court held that civil courts must refer tenancy disputes to revenue courts but cannot reject suits outright when related tenancy suits are pending, restoring a suit challenging a gift deed involving ancestral property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant khatedari rights Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 civil court jurisdiction revenue court

Torrent Power Ltd. v. Ashish Arjunkumar Rathi & Others

27 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 206

The Supreme Court upheld the non-interference with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom in approving a resolution plan under the IBC, dismissing challenges alleging modification of the plan and material irregularity.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Committee of Creditors Resolution Plan Commercial Wisdom

BHAGYALAXMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. v. BABALDAS AMTHARAM PATEL

27 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 205

The Supreme Court held that sureties are liable only up to the originally sanctioned loan amount and discharged from liability for excess withdrawals made without their consent under Section 133 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

civil appeal_allowed Significant surety liability Indian Contract Act 1872 Section 133 Section 139

DR. JIJI K.S. v. SHIBU K

27 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2026 INSC 207
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld its earlier judgment protecting appellants' promotions without Ph.D. qualification and clarified remedies for non-parties aggrieved by tribunal or court orders affecting their service rights.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Technical Education Service Rules AICTE Regulations Ph.D. qualification Promotion in technical education

Ankit Tomar v. State of Haryana

26 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 262
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging rape on promise of marriage, holding that a consensual relationship with a married complainant negates the offence under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent rape promise of marriage quashing of FIR

S G Jamaludheen v. State of Karnataka

26 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2026 INSC 235

The Supreme Court resolved a long-standing recruitment dispute by permitting withdrawal of challenges and directing appointment of identified candidates with conditions, upholding existing appointments and making interim orders absolute under Article 142.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Inspectors recruitment Karnataka Public Service Commission Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Central Government Notification

NOIL CHRISTURAJ v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

26 Feb 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 201
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court holds that simultaneous insolvency proceedings under the IBC against a principal debtor and its corporate guarantor are maintainable, rejecting the doctrine of election and affirming statutory safeguards against double recovery.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Simultaneous proceedings Corporate guarantor

Suhas Chakma v. Union of India

26 Feb 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 198
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court mandated States to establish and expand Open Correctional Institutions as a constitutionally compliant, rehabilitative solution to prison overcrowding, ensuring prisoners' dignity and rights under Article 21.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Open Correctional Institutions prison overcrowding Article 21 prisoners' rights

Vivekananda Kendra v. Pradeep Kumar Agarwalla

26 Feb 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 199

The Supreme Court held that a registered 99-year lease deed confers a leasehold interest that cannot be unilaterally cancelled, and a subsequent sale during its subsistence is subject to the lessee's rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease deed license unilateral cancellation exclusive possession

THE STATE OF KERALA v. M/s. PANACEA BIOTEC LTD.

26 Feb 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2026 INSC 200
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that complaints filed by public servants are exempt from mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC, limitation runs from when accused identity is known, and vicarious liability under Section 34 of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act is a trial issue, thereby setting aside the High Court's quashing orders and allowing prosecution to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 202 CrPC public servant complaint limitation period Section 34 Drugs & Cosmetics Act

Ogeppa (D) Through Lrs. and Others v. Sahebgouda (D) Through Lrs. and Others

25 Feb 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 191

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal, affirming the respondents as hereditary pujaries entitled to perform puja at the Amogasidda temple based on continuous possession and evidence despite an old decree claimed by appellants.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant hereditary pujari rights wahiwatdar pujari Amogasidda temple possession

M/S HAMDARD (WAKF) LABORATORIES v. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX

25 Feb 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 195
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that "Sharbat Rooh Afza" is a fruit drink taxable at 4% under Entry 103 of the UPVAT Act, overturning its classification under the residuary entry at 12.5%.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Value Added Tax fruit drink classification common parlance test

Ram Narain v. The Sub Divisional Officer

25 Feb 2026 · S.V.N. Bhatti; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 193

The Supreme Court upheld statutory regularisation of occupants' possession under Section 123(2) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, dismissing the appeal challenging eviction claims based on a Section 143 declaration and title.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 Section 123(2) Section 143 statutory fiction

Ghanshyam Mandal and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

25 Feb 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 194

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions based on credible ocular evidence despite non-recovery of weapons and procedural objections, dismissing the appellants' challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 313 CrPC ocular evidence

Vandana Jain & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

25 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 192

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR alleging cheating and forgery in a joint venture dispute, holding that the matter was essentially civil and criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR civil dispute vs criminal offence joint venture agreement security money

M/S. ADISHAKTI DEVELOPERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASTRA

25 Feb 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2026 INSC 197
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of an auction sale for non-deposit of the full purchase money within the stipulated period, affirming the maintainability of revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act despite alternative remedies.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Section 154 revision Rule 107 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 auction sale

Israr Ahmad Khan v. Amarnath Prasad & Ors.; Md. Hanif v. Amarnath Prasad & Ors.

24 Feb 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 209
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that wilful non-compliance with its final order, even pending a defective review petition, constitutes contempt, and third parties aiding such breach are also liable.

constitutional other Significant contempt of court non-compliance Supreme Court order review petition

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Amit Chaturvedi and Ors.

24 Feb 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 189
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a defunct Scheme of Arrangement under the Companies Act cannot bar initiation of insolvency proceedings under the IBC, affirming the overriding effect of the IBC and allowing the CIRP to proceed.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings Scheme of Arrangement Companies Act, 1956 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016