Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Surendra @ Sunda v. State of Uttar Pradesh

13 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 414

The Supreme Court held that remission powers rest solely with the appropriate authority and mandated the development of an automated software system to ensure timely and transparent processing of premature release applications for life convicts.

criminal other Significant remission premature release life imprisonment Section 432 CrPC

Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner

13 Apr 2026 · Rajesh Bindal; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 359
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, an amalgamated company cannot set off the accumulated losses of the amalgamating company without statutory notice and within the prescribed carry-forward period, dismissing the appellant's claim.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991 amalgamation carry forward and set off of losses scheme of amalgamation

Anosh Ekka v. State through Central Bureau of Investigation

13 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 357

The Supreme Court granted bail to a former Minister convicted for corruption and illegal land acquisition, holding that bail is permissible during appeal where substantial custody has been undergone and sentence in related case is suspended, while leaving the double jeopardy issue for the High Court to decide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 double jeopardy

Milind S/o Ashruba Dhanve and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra

10 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 355
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that offenders sentenced only to pay fines are eligible for probation under Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and granted the appellants such benefit while upholding their convictions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 3 Probation of Offenders Act Section 4 Probation of Offenders Act fine as punishment

Ram Chandra Choudhary & Ors v. Roop Nagar Dugd Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited and Others

10 Apr 2026 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 347

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction does not extend to private co-operative societies governed by a statutory dispute resolution mechanism and upheld the validity of bye-laws prescribing eligibility criteria for elections under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 co-operative societies bye-laws

M.V. Ramachandrasa Legal Heirs v. M/s. Mahendra Watch Company

10 Apr 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 348

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and wrongly setting aside the eviction order for unlawful sub-letting, affirming that partnership reconstitution without landlord consent does not confer tenancy rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant revisional jurisdiction Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 sub-letting partnership firm

Mamta Devi v. Sanjay Kumar

10 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 346

The Supreme Court upheld divorce granted on grounds of cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, while increasing the maintenance awarded to the appellant.

family appeal_dismissed divorce cruelty desertion Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

The State of Kerala v. M. Vijayakumar & Ors.

10 Apr 2026 · Manoj Misra; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 352

The Supreme Court held that differential enhancement rates of dearness allowance and dearness relief for serving employees and pensioners, without rational nexus to the common object of mitigating inflation, violate Article 14 and are arbitrary and discriminatory.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Dearness Allowance Dearness Relief Article 14 Equality

Nitendra Kumar Tomer v. Unox S.P.A.

10 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 356

The Supreme Court held that an appeal filed by a suspended director in the name of the corporate debtor after appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional is wholly incompetent and dismissed the appeal for being time-barred and not maintainable.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Interim Resolution Professional Section 9 application Section 61 limitation

Kamal Prasad Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh

10 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 353

The Supreme Court held that the Registrar cannot arbitrarily reject the Board of Directors' resolution granting relaxation in educational qualification for promotion, and denial of such promotion to the appellant amounted to unconstitutional discrimination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Cooperative Society Rules Relaxation in educational qualification Promotion Discrimination

Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

10 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 350
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's khatedari rights by restoring the original decree, rejecting delay condonation and procedural irregularity claims, and affirming repudiation of a voidable sale deed executed by a minor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant khatedari rights Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 voidable sale deed minor's sale deed

Dhan Jee Pandey v. State of Bihar & Another

10 Apr 2026 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 349
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order suspending sentence and granting bail to a life convict under Section 302 IPC, holding that suspension of sentence in serious offences is an exceptional relief requiring careful consideration without reappreciation of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 CrPC Section 302 IPC life imprisonment

Poonam Dwivedi v. State of U.P.

10 Apr 2026 · Manoj Misra; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 351
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that EWS certificates must relate to the financial year preceding the application year and dismissed appeals challenging rejection of invalid certificates in a public recruitment process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Economically Weaker Sections EWS certificate financial year reservation

The State of Uttarakhand v. Sarita Singh

09 Apr 2026 · J. K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 337
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that extraordinary pension claims under the Rules of 1981 require Governor's sanction and proper administrative discretion, setting aside the High Court's direction and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant extraordinary pension Uttar Pradesh Civil Services Rules 1981 administrative discretion Governor's sanction

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. R Z Malpani

09 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 342
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a conditional Letter of Intent does not create a binding arbitration agreement by mere reference to tender documents, setting aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letter of Intent Arbitration Agreement Incorporation of Arbitration Clause Section 7 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

M/S Nirmal Ujjwal Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Ravi Sethia & Ors.

09 Apr 2026 · J.B. Pardiwala; K.V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 338

The Supreme Court clarified that under Section 64(d) of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, an MSCS can invest only in a subsidiary or an institution in the same line of business as per its bye-laws, and held that the appellant cooperative society was not in the same line of business as the corporate debtor, rendering it ineligible to submit a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 Section 64(d) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 same line of business

Roma Ahuja v. The State

09 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 336

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period under Section 468 CrPC is computed from the date of filing the complaint or FIR, not from the date of taking cognizance by the Magistrate, and set aside the High Court's order quashing the FIR on limitation grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Landmark Section 468 CrPC limitation period date of filing complaint date of taking cognizance

Sib Nath Chatterjee v. Tulsidas Chatterjee

09 Apr 2026 · Manoj Misra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 409
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the right of pre-emption under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, must be exercised within the statutory limitation period from the date of transfer, and absence of notice does not extend this period for a raiyat possessing contiguous land.

property appeal_dismissed Significant right of pre-emption West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 limitation period notice of transfer

RUSSI FISHERIES P. LTD. & ANR. v. BHAVNA SETH & ORS.

09 Apr 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 339

The Supreme Court upheld the decree of specific performance of an agreement to sell, holding that findings of fact on readiness, payment, and extension of time are final and that transfers made during litigation are void under lis pendens.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell readiness and willingness doctrine of lis pendens

Maurice W. Innis v. Lily Kazrooni

09 Apr 2026 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 340

The Supreme Court held that the Executing Court cannot modify the terms of a compromise decree and must execute it strictly as passed, setting aside orders that altered land allotments during execution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Executing Court jurisdiction Compromise decree Section 47 CPC Execution of decree