Supreme Court of India
8,449 judgments
PM Cold Storage Private Limited v. Monotrone Leasing Private Limited
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition for failing to meet the stringent criteria established for reopening its final judgments.
M/s. ICE TV PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/s. SREEDEVI DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Supreme Court dismissed the Curative Petition for failing to meet the strict criteria established in Rupa Ashok Hurra, rejecting the request for an oral hearing.
M/s. ICE TV PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/s. SREEDEVI DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition filed by M/s. ICE TV Private Limited for failing to meet the strict criteria established in Rupa Ashok Hurra, rejecting the request for oral hearing.
Arjun Prakash v. Shyam Sahani & Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Curative Petition for failing to meet the stringent criteria established in Rupa Ashok Hurra and denied oral hearing.
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Afcons Gunanusa JV
The Supreme Court held that arbitrators cannot unilaterally fix fees without party consent, clarified the interpretation of 'sum in dispute' and fee ceiling under the Fourth Schedule, and directed fresh tribunal constitution to ensure fair fee fixation.
Marayammal & Ors. v. K.S. Venkidusamy & Anr.
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition for failing to meet the strict criteria established in Rupa Ashok Hurra, reaffirming the limited scope of curative petitions as extraordinary remedies.
Marayammal & Ors. v. K.S. Venkidusamy & Anr.
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition for failing to meet the stringent criteria established for such petitions and denied the request for oral hearing.
Ex. Havildar Bhoop Singh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition filed by Ex. Havildar Bhoop Singh for failing to meet the strict criteria established for such petitions under its inherent jurisdiction.
Ex. Havildar Bhoop Singh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition for failing to meet the strict criteria established in Rupa Ashok Hurra, reaffirming the limited scope of curative petitions as a last judicial resort.
Punjab National Bank v. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC petition filed within three years of acknowledgment of debt and recovery certificate issuance is not barred by limitation, setting aside the NCLAT order dismissing it on limitation grounds.
Punjab National Bank v. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC petition filed within three years from the date of the recovery certificate or acknowledgment is not barred by limitation and allowed the appeal against the NCLAT order dismissing it on limitation grounds.
Securities and Exchange Board Of India v. Rajkumar Nagpal & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the SEBI Circular on debenture trustee procedures does not apply retrospectively and affirmed the civil court's jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes under Debenture Trust Deeds, dismissing SEBI's appeal.
Securities and Exchange Board Of India v. Rajkumar Nagpal & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the SEBI Circular on debenture trustee procedures does not apply retrospectively and that civil courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate debenture holders' rights under trust deeds predating the circular.
Rakesh @ Bhura Rajak v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, holding no error apparent on record and upholding the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Rakesh @ Bhura Rajak v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition against conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, holding no error apparent on record to warrant interference.
Viraj Tra Desai v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking transfer of investigation and other reliefs as infructuous, directing the pending Naroda Gaam trial to conclude in accordance with law and allowing protection claims to be pursued through proper channels.
Sanjeet Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case due to serious doubts cast on the search and seizure procedure and hostile independent witnesses, emphasizing the necessity of credible corroboration in such prosecutions.
Sanjeet Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case due to serious doubts about the validity of search and seizure, emphasizing that independent witnesses' denial of presence undermines prosecution evidence despite police testimony.
Mahadeo & Ors. v. Smt. Sovan Devi & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that inter-departmental communications do not constitute formal allotment orders and failure to take possession within six months leads to deemed cancellation of land allotment under the Rajasthan Rules, setting aside the High Court's order directing possession to the petitioner.
Mahadeo & Ors. v. Smt. Sovan Devi & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that an inter-departmental communication is not a formal allotment and failure to take possession within six months under the Rajasthan Rules results in deemed cancellation, setting aside the High Court's order directing possession of land to the disabled ex-serviceman's widow.