Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

S.P. Mani and Mohan Dairy v. Dr. Snehalatha Elangovan

16 Sep 2022 · Surya Kant; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that mere bald averments that a partner was in charge and responsible for the firm suffice to proceed under Section 138 read with Section 141 NI Act, and quashing of complaint under Section 482 CrPC is not warranted without unimpeachable evidence to the contrary.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability partnership firm

Vijay Kumar Goyal v. Neena Rani

16 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that higher stamp duty under the Punjab Stamp Act is not leviable where agreements do not evidence delivery of possession, allowing the appeal and setting aside orders imposing deficient stamp duty and penalty.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance stamp duty Indian Stamp Act possession

Nitu Kumar v. Gulveer

16 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari · 2022 INSC 972

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder case, emphasizing that the seriousness of the offence and the accused's complicity must be considered before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC murder gravity of offence

Nitu Kumar v. Gulveer

16 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity to consider the seriousness of the offence and the accused's role before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC murder gravity of offence

Sudha & Ors. v. Jaiprakash Associates Limited

16 Sep 2022 · Surya Kant; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellants were not entitled to refund as the complaint was premature and there was no deficiency in service, affirming the contractual grace period for possession under the allotment terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 possession delay refund claim standard terms and conditions

Sudha & Ors. v. Jaiprakash Associates Limited

16 Sep 2022 · Surya Kant; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a buyer under a real estate allotment cannot claim refund before expiry of the contractual possession period plus grace period, dismissing the premature consumer complaint for deficiency in service.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 possession delay refund claim standard terms and conditions

Sudhamayee Pattnaik v. Bibhu Prasad Sahoo

16 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari · 2022 INSC 971

The Supreme Court held that subsequent purchasers cannot be impleaded as defendants against the plaintiffs' wishes on defendants' application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, affirming the plaintiffs' status as dominus litis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC impleadment of parties dominus litis subsequent purchasers

Sudhamayee Pattnaik v. Bibhu Prasad Sahoo

16 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that subsequent purchasers cannot be impleaded as defendants against the plaintiffs' wishes under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, affirming the plaintiffs' status as dominus litis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC impleadment of parties dominus litis subsequent purchasers

Suresh Paswan v. M/s. Kla Construction Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

16 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari · 2022 INSC 973

The Supreme Court held that compensation awarded for permanent disability based on timely medical evidence cannot be negated by a delayed Medical Board report and directed that the amount already withdrawn be treated as full and final settlement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation permanent disability disability certificate Medical Board report

Suresh Paswan v. M/s. Kla Construction Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

16 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that an employer must timely request a Medical Board examination to dispute permanent disability and restored compensation awarded based on an earlier disability certificate despite a later contrary Medical Board report.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation permanent disability disability certificate Medical Board

Steel Authority of India Limited v. Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar

16 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that 'Guide Car' is not a component of Coke Oven Battery and denied Modvat credit, but quashed the penalty due to bonafide belief in classification.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Modvat credit Central Excise Rules 1944 Rule 57Q classification of goods

Pharmacy Council of India v. Rajeev College of Pharmacy

15 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2022 INSC 965

The Supreme Court held that the Pharmacy Council of India cannot impose a moratorium on opening new pharmacy colleges by executive resolution without legislative backing, as it violates the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g).

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Pharmacy Council of India moratorium fundamental right Article 19(1)(g)

Pharmacy Council of India v. Rajeev College of Pharmacy

15 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that the Pharmacy Council of India cannot impose a moratorium on opening new pharmacy colleges by executive resolutions without legislative backing, as such restrictions on the fundamental right to establish educational institutions must be imposed only by law.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Pharmacy Council of India moratorium fundamental right Article 19(1)(g)

Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

15 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a serious offence accused, emphasizing the need for reasoned consideration of offence gravity and identification at the bail stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail serious offences IPC Sections 302, 307 identification

Kanchan Kumar v. State of Bihar

14 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that manifest errors in prosecution evidence must be excluded at the discharge stage under Section 227 Cr.P.C., and discharged the accused where no prima facie case of disproportionate assets was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C. prima facie case disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

ANIL KUMAR MODI v. TARSEM KUMAR GUPTA

14 Sep 2022 · B. R. Gavai; C. T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 961

The Supreme Court upheld the respondent-plaintiff's exclusive possession rights over a common passage, holding that prior findings did not operate as res judicata on this issue.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant exclusive possession common passage easementary rights res judicata

The Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Cricket Association of Bihar

14 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court approved amendments to the BCCI Constitution refining the cooling off period and disqualification criteria for office bearers, emphasizing judicial oversight and preventing concentration of power.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant BCCI Constitution cooling off period office bearers amendments

The Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Cricket Association of Bihar

14 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli · (2018) 9 SCC 624

The Supreme Court approved amendments to the BCCI Constitution refining cooling off periods and disqualification criteria for office bearers, balancing governance integrity with autonomy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant BCCI Constitution cooling off period office bearers amendments

Kavi Arora v. Securities & Exchange Board of India

14 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that SEBI must disclose all documents relied upon at the inquiry stage to the noticee but is not required to furnish the preliminary opinion under Rule 3, dismissing the petition challenging SEBI's adjudication procedure.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Adjudication Rules 1995 Show Cause Notice Duty of disclosure Natural justice

R.D. Kaushal v. Union of India

14 Sep 2022 · B.R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2022 INSC 962

The Supreme Court upheld the binding effect of an unchallenged tribunal order merging AFLE and DFLE cadres retrospectively for terminal benefits and pension calculation, directing payment accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant cadre merger Assistant Foreign Language Examiner Deputy Foreign Language Examiner Research and Analysis Wing