Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Balram Singh v. Kelo Devi

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that a suit for permanent injunction cannot be decreed on the basis of an unregistered agreement to sell when specific performance is barred, allowing the appeal and restoring the trial Court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unregistered agreement to sell permanent injunction specific performance Registration Act

Inspector of Panchayats and District Collector, Salem v. S. Arichandran

23 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where a disciplinary inquiry is vitiated by breach of natural justice, the matter must be remitted for fresh inquiry rather than direct reinstatement, and set aside the High Court's reinstatement order accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice misappropriation reinstatement

Harpal Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

23 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation amounts for land acquisition in Punjab appeals, denied interest due to delay, and ordered payment of enhanced compensation with solatium within three months.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement solatium statutory benefits

Narayan & Ors. v. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and increasing the interest rate to 7.5%, modifying the High Court's award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects compensation multiplier method

Narayan & Ors. v. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and increasing the interest rate to 7.5%, allowing the appeal of the claimants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects compensation enhancement rate of interest

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Tata Communications Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that BSNL's revised infrastructure charges cannot be applied retrospectively from 2009 but allowed a notional 10% annual increase to be charged prospectively from 2013.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant infrastructure charges retrospective effect telecom service providers interconnection agreements

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Tata Communications Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that BSNL's revised infrastructure charges circular cannot be applied retrospectively but allowed a notional annual increase prospectively from 2013, modifying the Tribunal's orders accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant infrastructure charges retrospective applicability telecom service providers interconnection agreements

Gopi @ Goverdhannath v. Sri Ballabh Vyas

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar · 2022 INSC 1000
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of tenants who malafidely denied the landlord's title supported by a registered sale deed and affirmed the landlord's bona fide requirement under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant eviction registered sale deed malafide denial of title Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960

Gopi @ Goverdhannath v. Sri Ballabh Vyas

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of tenants who mala fide denied the landlord's title established by a registered sale deed, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and concurrent findings of lower courts.

property appeal_dismissed Significant eviction registered sale deed mala fide denial of title Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960

D. Swamy v. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of ex post facto Environmental Clearance and dismissed the appeal seeking closure of a bio-medical waste treatment facility operating with valid consent despite lack of prior clearance.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance EIA Notification 2006 ex post facto clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

D. Swamy v. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of ex post facto Environmental Clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act and dismissed the appeal seeking closure of a Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility operating with valid consent despite lack of prior clearance.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant Environmental Clearance Ex post facto clearance Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 Environment (Protection) Act 1986

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD v. AJAY BHATIA

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that execution of a possession decree must be confined to the specifically identified suit property with proper demarcation, and mesne profits are payable from lawful termination of tenancy until possession is relinquished.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession decree mesne profits execution of decree demarcation of suit property

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD v. AJAY BHATIA

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that execution of a possession decree must be confined to the specifically described suit property, directing fresh demarcation and computation of mesne profits from lawful tenancy termination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession decree mesne profits execution of decree immovable property

K. Priyadharshini v. M/s Gammon India Limited

22 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding future prospects at 40% and upheld Income Tax Returns as valid evidence for calculating the deceased's income.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects Income Tax Return

Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings against Doshi Holdings as a co-borrower under the loan agreements despite no direct loan disbursement to it, distinguishing pledge from financial debt.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process financial debt pledge

Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings against Doshi Holdings as a co-borrower under the loan agreements, distinguishing pledgor status from financial debtor liability under the IBC.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process financial debt pledge

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...

The Supreme Court upheld its 2017 final compensation order under Article 142, dismissing claims for increased compensation based on actual landholding, holding that the settlement is binding and not subject to modification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 142 Constitution Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award Project Affected Families Resettlement and Rehabilitation

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking enhancement of compensation beyond the fixed Rs 60 lakhs per family determined in its 2017 order as a full and final settlement under Article 142.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal resettlement and rehabilitation project affected families Article 142 Constitution

Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that an insolvency application admitted under Section 7 of the IBC can be withdrawn before constitution of the Committee of Creditors, and directed the NCLT to consider the pending settlement application accordingly.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 IBC Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors

M/s. DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY LIMITED v. OSCAR INVESTMENTS LIMITED

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K.M. Joseph
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held respondents and associated entities guilty of contempt for violating orders restraining alienation of shares, emphasizing strict compliance with court undertakings to protect enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.

civil contempt_found_and_proceedings_initiated Significant Foreign Arbitral Award enforcement Contempt of Court Shareholding status quo Pledge and encumbrance of shares