Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

M/s. Fashion World v. Banshidhar Multi Builders Pvt. Ltd.

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal setting aside orders striking off its defence for non-payment of GST after deposit of the amount and directed payment of rent with periodic enhancements as per the lease.

civil appeal_allowed Significant M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 Section 13(6) tenant defence GST liability

Sarup Singh @ Ram Sarup v. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd.

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying 40% future prospects, appropriate deductions, and fixed interest at 7.5% per annum, clarifying principles for loss of dependency and consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects

M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

17 Oct 2022 · B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative enactment rescinding earlier tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant promissory estoppel tax exemption CGST Act, 2017 Office Memorandum 2003

M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

17 Oct 2022 · B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative rescission of tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant promissory estoppel tax exemption CGST Act, 2017 Office Memorandum 2003

Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana

17 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as per the Reference Court's award not challenged by the State, setting aside the High Court's reduction of compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Reference Court

Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana

17 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as accepted by the State, setting aside the High Court's order reducing compensation below that amount.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Reference Court

Manoj Kumar Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors.

17 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; V. Ramasubramanian · 2022 INSC 1104

The Supreme Court held that a public servant can file a private complaint for defamation without following the special procedure under Section 199(4) CrPC, and dismissed appeals challenging the summoning orders in a defamation case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant defamation Section 199 CrPC special procedure public servant

Manoj Kumar Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors.

17 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that public servants can file defamation complaints individually under Section 199(6) CrPC without following the special procedure under Section 199(4), and summoning orders based on such complaints should be upheld if the allegations constitute an offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant defamation Section 199 CrPC special procedure public servant

Talalkena Gowdra Parameshwarappa v. The Branch Manager

16 Oct 2022 · Nagarathna J.

The Supreme Court clarified the correct approach to assess compensation for permanent disability in motor accident claims, enhancing the award to Rs.11,67,405 based on the actual impact on earning capacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permanent disability loss of earning capacity compensation assessment

Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar

14 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court decree holding that concurrent findings on execution of a promissory note cannot be disturbed on second appeal merely due to non-examination of attesting witness when other evidence proves execution and consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promissory note execution of document concurrent findings Section 100 CPC

Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar

14 Oct 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court restored the trial court decree holding that concurrent findings on execution of a promissory note cannot be upset in second appeal merely due to non-examination of attesting witness when other evidence proves execution and consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promissory note execution of negotiable instrument Section 100 CPC Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act

Roopwati & Ors. v. Ram Kishan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2022 INSC 1089

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim by applying the correct age multiplier and granting future prospects with increased interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation multiplier future prospects

Roopwati & Ors. v. Ram Kishan & Ors.

14 Oct 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award in a motor accident claim by correctly applying the multiplier based on the deceased's actual age and allowing future prospects.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim compensation multiplier future prospects

M/s Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd v. State of U.P

14 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that mandatory payment of 80% estimated compensation before possession under Section 17(3A) is a pre-condition for absolute vesting of land, and Section 11A applies to acquisitions under Section 17, causing lapse if no award is passed within two years when payment is not made.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17(3A) Section 11A compensation

M/s Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd v. State of U.P

14 Oct 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that mandatory payment of 80% estimated compensation before possession under Section 17(3A) is essential for absolute vesting of land, and non-compliance leads to lapse of acquisition under Section 11A, protecting landowners' rights in urgent land acquisitions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 17(3A) Section 11A compensation

Kesar Bai v. Genda Lal

14 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a party cannot claim title both by Sale Deed and adverse possession simultaneously and set aside the decree granting permanent injunction based on adverse possession when title by Sale Deed was negated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession registered Sale Deed permanent injunction title claim

Kesar Bai v. Genda Lal

14 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a plaintiff cannot claim title by adverse possession after failing to prove ownership by Sale Deed, and thus is not entitled to permanent injunction protecting possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession sale deed permanent injunction title claim

Kerala Land Reforms & Development Co-operative Society Limited v. The District Registrar (General)

14 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court's ruling that remission of stamp duty under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 is available only if the society or its officers/members would have been liable to pay such duty, dismissing claims for remission on sale deeds executed by members in their own capacity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant remission of stamp duty cooperative societies Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 SRO No. 75/1960

Kerala Land Reforms & Development Co-operative Society Limited v. The District Registrar (General)

14 Oct 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that remission of stamp duty under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 is available only if the society or its members are liable to pay such duty, dismissing appeals seeking remission on sale deeds executed by members or the society.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant remission of stamp duty cooperative societies Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 SRO 75/1960

Sunita Burman v. The Commissioner, M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

14 Oct 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a work charged employee who was not regularized and did not opt for the National Pension Scheme is not entitled to family pension or retiral benefits from the Housing Board.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant work charged employee family pension regularization of service National Pension Scheme