Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...

The Supreme Court upheld its 2017 final compensation order under Article 142, dismissing claims for increased compensation based on actual landholding, holding that the settlement is binding and not subject to modification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 142 Constitution Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award Project Affected Families Resettlement and Rehabilitation

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

22 Sep 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hima Kohli; Pamidighantam Sri Nara...
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking enhancement of compensation beyond the fixed Rs 60 lakhs per family determined in its 2017 order as a full and final settlement under Article 142.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal resettlement and rehabilitation project affected families Article 142 Constitution

Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd.

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that an insolvency application admitted under Section 7 of the IBC can be withdrawn before constitution of the Committee of Creditors, and directed the NCLT to consider the pending settlement application accordingly.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 IBC Section 12A IBC Committee of Creditors

M/s. DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY LIMITED v. OSCAR INVESTMENTS LIMITED

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held respondents and associated entities guilty of contempt for violating orders restraining alienation of shares, emphasizing strict compliance with court undertakings to protect enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.

civil contempt_found_and_proceedings_initiated Significant Foreign Arbitral Award enforcement Contempt of Court Shareholding status quo Pledge and encumbrance of shares

LRS. & ORS v. SARASWATI & ORS

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court restored the First Appellate Court's finding of valid adoption and ownership, holding that the High Court erred in entertaining a Second Appeal without a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Adoption

LRS. & ORS v. SARASWATI & ORS

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court restored the First Appellate Court's finding of valid adoption and ownership, holding that the High Court erred in entertaining a Second Appeal without a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Adoption

NKD Maritime Limited v. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai

22 Sep 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a vessel sold under Admiralty jurisdiction vests free of prior encumbrances, but the purchaser is liable for port dues and anchorage charges accruing from the date of sale sanction and possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Admiralty sale vessel sale encumbrances anchorage charges

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Kendriya Karamchari Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti

22 Sep 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court directed NOIDA to allot flats to 844 verified members of a cooperative society, settling long-pending land ceiling disputes and clarifying that land transfers violating Section 154 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act do not automatically vest in the State without statutory declaration.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 154 U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act land ceiling laws cooperative society land holdings NOIDA land allotment

Vinay Prakash Singh v. Sameer Gehlaut

22 Sep 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that custody undergone in connection with another case cannot be set off against a sentence in a contempt petition, and the imprisonment term commences from the date of the sentencing order.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Section 428 CrPC Custody Set off detention

Tata Motors Limited v. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority & Others

21 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court directed the transfer of central sales tax paid to the wrong State to the correct State in inter-state sales, emphasizing the non-retention of tax by an unauthorized State despite the absence of statutory provisions at the time of transaction.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 22(1B) inter-state sales tax refund

Tata Motors Limited v. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority & Others

21 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court directed the transfer of central sales tax paid to the wrong State on inter-state sales prior to the insertion of Section 22(1B), clarifying the remedy for such tax payments despite the Appellate Authority's lack of power at the time.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 22(1B) inter-state sale tax refund

HAR NARAINI DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA

20 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, ruling it governs agricultural land succession in Delhi and is not overridden by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act 1954 Hindu Succession Act 1956 Article 254 Constitution Ninth Schedule

HAR NARAINI DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA

20 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, ruling that it governs succession to agricultural land despite the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that its provisions are constitutionally protected under the Ninth Schedule.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Ninth Schedule Article 254 repugnancy

Harbhajan Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

20 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence of Haryana to enact the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014, holding that the Punjab Reorganisation Act and Inter-State Corporation Act provisions are transitional and do not oust State legislative powers over religious institutions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 Inter-State Corporation Act, 1957

State of Karnataka v. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla

20 Sep 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal in a forest land dispute, remanding the matter for fresh trial with directions to afford adequate opportunity to lead evidence and consider relevant survey reports.

civil appeal_allowed Significant forest land survey number renumbering Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Section 482 CrPC

The State of Maharashtra v. Greatship (India) Limited

20 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 991

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a tax assessment order is not maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy of appeal exists, and the petitioner must exhaust that remedy before approaching the High Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition statutory remedy assessment order

The State of Maharashtra v. Greatship (India) Limited

20 Sep 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked to bypass the statutory appeal remedy against an assessment order under the MVAT and CST Acts, and set aside the High Court's order entertaining such writ petition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition statutory remedy appeal

Ethel Lourdes D’Souza Lobo v. Lucio Neville Jude De Souza

19 Sep 2022 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court held that rights and obligations of a successful bidder in licitation proceedings under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code devolve upon heirs, and failure to pay bid amount before death does not extinguish such rights absent a demand for payment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Portuguese Civil Procedure Code Inventory proceedings Licitation Owelty money

Ethel Lourdes D’Souza Lobo v. Lucio Neville Jude De Souza

19 Sep 2022 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court held that rights and obligations of a successful bidder in inventory licitation proceedings under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code are heritable and pass to heirs even if the bid amount remains unpaid without formal demand, dismissing the appeal for reauction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Portuguese Civil Procedure Code Inventory proceedings Licitation Owelty money

Sumathy v. Babu

19 Sep 2022 · M. R. Shah; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including a 25% addition for future prospects on the deceased's income to ensure just loss of dependency award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency motor accident claim future prospects compensation