Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Haribhau @ Bhausaheb Dinkar Kharuse & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

· Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1266

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, affirming that members of an unlawful assembly sharing a common object are vicariously liable for offences committed by the group.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly vicarious liability murder

Jane Kaushik v. Union of India

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1248

The Supreme Court held that both State and private establishments have positive constitutional and statutory obligations to prevent discrimination against transgender persons and provide reasonable accommodation, directing enforcement of the 2019 Act and awarding relief to the petitioner.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant transgender rights discrimination reasonable accommodation fundamental rights

K.S. Manjunath and Others v. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa Batil and Others

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1298
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a suit for specific performance is not maintainable without challenging the validity of termination of an agreement to sell, and subsequent purchasers with notice of a subsisting agreement cannot claim bona fide purchaser status.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell termination of contract unilateral termination

Raj Pal Singh v. Rajveer & Ors.

· K. Vinod Chandran; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1442

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case, emphasizing that where two views are possible on evidence, acquittal should not be disturbed without compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Acquittal Appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Reasonable doubt

Jayantibhai Chaturbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat

· Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1443

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and enhanced sentence of a doctor for rape under Section 376(2)(d) IPC despite the victim and her husband turning hostile, relying on corroborative medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC hostile witness FIR evidence

Shaik Shabuddin v. State of Telangana

· Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1449

The Supreme Court affirmed rape and murder convictions but set aside SC/ST Act convictions and modified life sentence to 25 years for one accused, emphasizing knowledge of caste and admissibility of confession and recovery under Section 27 Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SC/ST Act Section 302 IPC Section 376D IPC Section 27 Evidence Act

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. DAYAMOY MAHATO

· Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1418

The Supreme Court held that Section 436-A CrPC does not apply to offences punishable with death, balanced the right to liberty under Article 21 against national security concerns in bail matters involving terrorism charges, and issued directions to expedite trials and ensure fairness under reverse burden statutes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 436-A CrPC Article 21 Constitution bail reverse burden of proof

Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Government of India & Ors.

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2026 INSC 97
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that lack of menstrual hygiene facilities in schools violates fundamental rights under Articles 14, 21, and 21A, directing the State to provide free sanitary pads and separate toilets to ensure substantive equality in education for adolescent girls.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant right to education menstrual hygiene management Article 14 equality Article 21 right to life

Sanjay Paliwal and Another v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd

· Aravind Kumar; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 61

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a suit for mandatory injunction due to disputed title and possession, holding such injunction without possession claim barred under Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mandatory injunction Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act title and possession dispute Section 100 CPC

Shrikrishna v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

· K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 45
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC in a group fight case, reduced the sentence considering the appellant's age and time served, and dismissed the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 Part II IPC murder Section 302 IPC

Gulfisha Fatima v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

· Aravind Kumar; N.V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 2
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the statutory bail restrictions under UAPA, dismissing bail pleas of accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case, while clarifying the constitutional and statutory framework governing bail and prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Article 21 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 43D(5) terrorist act

Divjot Sekhon v. State of Punjab and Others

· Sanjay Kumar · 2026 INSC 26
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that altering sports quota admission criteria mid-process to include achievements from Classes IX and X was arbitrary and unlawful, directing adjustment of admissions and emphasizing transparency and fairness in policy formulation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant sports quota MBBS/BDS admission midstream policy change Article 14

Ashish Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 May 3235 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 81

The Supreme Court held that statutory recruitment rules prevail over inconsistent advertisement qualifications and directed appointment of the appellant as Psychologist, rejecting the requirement of both graduation and training qualification together.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment rules advertisement qualification Psychologist post Janjatiya Vikas Shikshan Aur Kermchariverg Sewa Niyamawali, 1991

Ashish Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 May 3235 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that statutory recruitment rules prevail over contradictory advertisement qualifications and directed appointment of a candidate denied on incorrect qualification grounds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement qualification criteria Janjatiya Vikas Shikshan Aur Kermchariverg Sewa Niyamawali, 1991 Psychologist post

NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD. & ANR. v. B. GURAPPA NAIDU & ORS.

12 Sep 2026 · Aravind Kumar; N.V. Anjaria · 2026 INSC 434
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Article 227 by modifying the Executing Court's valuation of land compensation, affirming the Executing Court's determination of Rs. 1,000 per square foot as the correct guideline value under the Karnataka Government notification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction guideline value Karnataka Government notification 17.04.2007

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Terrascope Ventures Limited

13 Jun 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 245
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that diversion of preferential allotment proceeds for undisclosed purposes violates SEBI regulations and cannot be ratified by shareholders, restoring penalties imposed on the company and its directors.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI Act, 1992 PFUTP Regulations, 2003 Preferential allotment Diversion of funds

NEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. REKHA CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS

21 May 2026 · Aravind Kumar; Prasanna B. Varale · 2026 INSC 177

The Supreme Court held that penalty for delay in payment under Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees' Compensation Act is a personal liability of the employer and cannot be imposed on the insurer, who is liable only for compensation and interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(b) penalty liability insurance indemnity

Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir v. Saba Wani

30 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 439
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the closure of the Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme but directed appointment of candidates in select panels subject to acquiring minimum qualifications under the RTE Act, balancing vested rights and constitutional mandates for quality education.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme Closure Order Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 National Council for Teacher Education

Pawan Khera v. State of Assam

30 Apr 2026 · J.K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 437
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant accused of exhibiting allegedly forged documents in politically charged press conferences, emphasizing the need to balance personal liberty with investigation interests and rejecting custodial interrogation absent compelling necessity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Article 21 personal liberty Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India

29 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the creation or expansion of criminal offences relating to hate speech is exclusively a legislative function, reaffirming the doctrine of separation of powers and emphasizing enforcement of existing laws while allowing judicial oversight through continuing mandamus.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant hate speech judicial law-making separation of powers legislative domain