Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Muppidi Lakshmi Narayana Reddy & Ors. v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

· Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 562
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against husband’s relatives in a dowry case due to vague allegations and absence of specific involvement, emphasizing caution against misuse of legal provisions in matrimonial disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings dowry harassment Section 498A IPC

Amruddin Ansari v. Afajal Ali

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 566

The Supreme Court held that after dismissal of a suit under Order IX Rule 2 or 3 and rejection of restoration application under Rule 4, a fresh suit is maintainable and not barred by res judicata.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order IX Rule 4 CPC fresh suit maintainability restoration of suit res judicata

├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ v. │ Investigation,3 it was observed as under: - │

· Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 477

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail in serious economic offences involving evasion of process and non-bailable warrants is an extraordinary remedy to be granted sparingly, setting aside High Court orders that ignored mandatory bail conditions and accused conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail economic offences Section 447 Companies Act Section 212(6) Companies Act

STATE (NCT) OF DELHI v. RAJEEV SHARMA

· BELA M. TRIVEDI; PRASANNA B. VARALE · 2025 INSC 456

The Supreme Court held that offences prescribing only maximum imprisonment without a minimum sentence do not qualify for extended detention under Section 167(2)(a)(i) Cr.P.C., entitling the accused to default bail after 60 days.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Section 167(2) CrPC minimum sentence Official Secrets Act

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Pankaj Babulal Kotecha

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 792

The Supreme Court allowed MCGM's appeal, holding that a century-old lake transformed into a functional recreational park need not be restored, balancing environmental protection with sustainable urban development and public welfare.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant public trust doctrine environmental protection recreational park water body restoration

Bindu Kapurea v. Subhashish Panda

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 784

The Supreme Court held the DDA guilty of criminal contempt for unauthorized tree felling in the Delhi Ridge, ordered remedial ecological restoration, disciplinary action, and emphasized strict compliance with environmental and judicial safeguards.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant contempt of court Delhi Ridge tree felling environmental protection

Ravinder Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab

· B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 727

The Supreme Court directed consolidation of multiple FIRs within each State by merging subsequent FIRs with the earliest FIR, rejecting transfer across States, and clarified procedural aspects of investigation, trial, and bail in such consolidated cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant clubbing of FIRs consolidation of criminal cases multiple FIRs special enactments

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. SMS Limited

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 693
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the dispute resolution clauses in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s Concession Agreements do not constitute valid arbitration agreements under the Arbitration Act but prescribe mediation, setting aside conflicting High Court rulings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement dispute resolution clause mediation Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Hanumantharaju B v. M Akram Pasha

· Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 682

The Supreme Court held that pension cannot be deducted from salary for compensation calculation in motor accident claims, accepted a higher disability assessment, mandated addition of future prospects, and enhanced the compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation calculation disability assessment pension deduction

Krishan Kumar v. State of Haryana

· Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 638
Cites 1 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court held that compensation for lands acquired in adjacent villages Kukrola and Fazalwas must be equitable, upheld the belting method for valuation, and enhanced Kukrola's inner belt compensation to match Fazalwas at INR 1.21 crore per acre.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation belting method development cut

DAIVSHALA & ORS v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR

· Manoj Misra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 904

The Supreme Court held that a fatal accident occurring to an employee while commuting to work arises out of and in the course of employment under the Employees’ Compensation Act, applying the clarificatory and retrospective Section 51E of the ESI Act by analogy.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 accident arising out of and in the course of employment commuting accident

K. Purushottam Reddy v. Union of India

· Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 894

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional freeze on delimitation in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana until after the 2026 census, dismissing claims of discrimination based on the distinct constitutional regime governing Jammu and Kashmir as a Union Territory.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Delimitation Article 170 Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir

Kum. Shubha @ Shubhashankar v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

· M. M. Sundresh · 2025 INSC 830
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld life convictions for murder based on circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the importance of motive, admissibility of call records, and the constitutional ethos of reformation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence eyewitness testimony call detail records Section 302 IPC

Partha Das v. State of Tripura

· J.K. Maheshwari J. · 2025 INSC 1049
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that executive orders cancelling an ongoing recruitment process governed by statutory rules without legislative amendment are illegal, affirming the principle that administrative instructions cannot override statutory provisions and upholding candidates' legitimate expectation of fair recruitment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Tripura State Rifles Act New Recruitment Policy executive instructions statutory rules

Mepung Tadar Bage v. President of India

· J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 1047

The Supreme Court held that the alleged lapses by a member of Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission in a question paper leak case did not amount to misbehaviour under Article 317, and dismissed the reference for her removal.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 317 Constitution of India Public Service Commission misbehaviour removal of constitutional member

Vijay Krishnaswami v. Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)

· J.K. Maheshwari · 2025 INSC 1048

The Supreme Court quashed prosecution under Section 276C(1) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with binding departmental guidelines and after grant of immunity from penalty by the Settlement Commission, holding such prosecution an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 276C(1) Income Tax Act prosecution sanction Settlement Commission immunity Section 245C application

Competition Commission of India v. Kerala Film Exhibitors Federation

· Manoj Misra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1167
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that forwarding the DG report and calling for replies suffices as notice for penalty under the Competition Act, and set aside the appellate tribunal's order quashing penalties on office-bearers for lack of separate notice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Section 27 penalty Section 48 liability Director General report

Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar v. Union of India

· Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1145

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of rescission of Portuguese-era land grants under the special Dadra and Nagar Haveli law, rejecting waiver claims and new grounds raised late, and affirmed the High Court’s interference with lower courts’ findings.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Alvara Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli emphyteusis land grant rescission

Shanti Devi v. Jagan Devi & Ors.

· J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1105
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a suit for possession based on a sale deed void ab initio is governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and dismissed the appeal affirming the suit's maintainability within limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 59 Article 65 Sale deed

Deep Nursing Home and another v. Manmeet Singh Mattewal and others

· Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 1094

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that no medical negligence was proved against the doctor and nursing home in delivery and post-delivery care, and that the NCDRC erred in deciding antenatal negligence beyond pleadings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence consumer protection antenatal care postpartum hemorrhage