Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Ratnank Mishra & Others v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

19 Dec 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1477

The Supreme Court held that similarly appointed ad-hoc employees denied regularization without reasonable justification suffer unconstitutional discrimination and directed their reinstatement and regularization with consequential benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularization ad-hoc appointment Article 14 equality

Syed Shahnawaz Ali v. State of Madhya Pradesh

19 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1484

The Supreme Court held that criminal revision proceedings do not abate on death of the revisionist and allowed the victim's legal heir to assist in continuing the revision, restoring the petition for adjudication on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal revision abatement substitution revisional jurisdiction

Bhagyashree Bisi v. Animesh Padhee

18 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1464

The Supreme Court set aside a divorce decree on desertion and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142, directing a lump sum alimony payment to settle all claims.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce desertion mutual consent Article 142

Kiran v. The State of Karnataka

18 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1453

The Supreme Court held that Sessions Courts cannot impose life imprisonment without remission or deny statutory set-off, confirming the conviction but modifying the sentence to life imprisonment with remission and set-off benefits under the CrPC.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant life imprisonment remission set-off Section 428 CrPC

Manoj @ Munna v. The State of Chhattisgarh

18 Dec 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1466

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, holding that conviction solely on the last seen together theory without a complete chain of circumstantial evidence is unsustainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

State of Karnataka v. Gandhi Jeevan Collective Farming Co-operative Society Limited

18 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1461
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that leases for agricultural use of forest land without prior Central Government approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 are illegal, upheld eviction of unauthorized occupants, and directed restoration of forest land.

environmental/forest law appeal_allowed Significant Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Section 2 forest land lease

Rajesh Upadhayay v. State of Bihar

18 Dec 2025 · Manmohan; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1468

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's suspension of life sentences and bail granted to murder convicts, emphasizing that suspension of sentence in serious offences under Section 302 IPC is an exceptional relief requiring gross error in trial judgment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence Section 302 IPC life imprisonment instigation

M/S. Carborandum Universal Ltd v. ESI Corporation

18 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1455
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that Section 45A of the Employees State Insurance Act can be invoked only when records are not produced or inspection is obstructed, and set aside the contribution demand made under Section 45A where the employer had produced records and cooperated.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 45A Section 77(1A)(b) limitation

Siddhant Mahajan and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

18 Dec 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1458
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that only the Central Government can lower NEET qualifying percentiles for BDS admissions, regularized admissions under State-sanctioned relaxation up to 15 percentile for 2016-17, and struck down admissions beyond that as illegal.

education appeal_allowed Significant NEET BDS admissions Dental Council of India Dentists Act 1948

M/S. SURGUJA BRICKS INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

18 Dec 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1456

The Supreme Court held that experience gained as a partner in a joint venture must be proportionately considered for tender eligibility unless explicitly excluded, and disqualification on this ground was arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant joint venture experience tender eligibility criteria prime contractor arbitrariness

Radhika T. v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

18 Dec 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1462

The Supreme Court held that vacancies arising during the validity of a Rank List must be filled by applying communal rotation simultaneously, and a candidate’s mere position in the Rank List does not entitle appointment if the vacancy falls to another category under rotation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Rank List validity Communal rotation Reservation Cochin University of Science and Technology Act, 1986

Baburam Gautam and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

18 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1493
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to quash criminal proceedings and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 and Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act following a comprehensive settlement.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Article 142 Constitution of India Section 13B Hindu Marriage Act quashing criminal proceedings

Jatinder Kumar v. Jeewan Lata

18 Dec 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1463
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dissolved a long-separated marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution due to irretrievable breakdown and awarded permanent alimony as a lump sum settlement.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India divorce permanent alimony

State of Telangana v. Mir Jaffar Ali Khan (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 1465
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that 102 acres in Survey No. 201/1 is private Arazi-Makta land of Salar Jung-III, affirmed the FSO's jurisdiction to admit the claim and exclude the land from reserved forest notifications, and dismissed the State's appeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Telangana Forest Act, 1967 Arazi-Makta Abolition of Jagirs Regulation Forest Settlement Officer jurisdiction

Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board v. Penjarla Vijay Kumar & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 1452

The Supreme Court held that driving licences expired and renewed after a gap do not satisfy the statutory requirement of continuous possession for recruitment eligibility under the Motor Vehicles Act as amended in 2019.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 Driving licence renewal Continuous licence possession

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna Murari Sharma

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1500

The Supreme Court held that gross delay in raising an industrial dispute disentitles full back wages but allows compensation, permitting the employer to raise delay before the Labour Court even if the reference order was not challenged under Article 226.

labor appeal_allowed Significant industrial dispute delay in raising dispute back wages illegal termination

Phool Singh v. Randheer Singh

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1492
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that non-impleadment of legal heirs of a deceased respondent causes abatement only against that respondent and not the entire civil revision petition, allowing belated impleadment to ensure proper adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil revision petition abatement legal heirs impleadment

Srinibas Goradia v. Arvind Kumar Sahu & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1467

The Supreme Court held that the dominant nature of an employee's duties, not designation, determines 'workman' status under the Industrial Disputes Act, reinstating the cashier terminated illegally without supervisory authority.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(s) Section 25-F

Obalappa v. Pawan Kumar Bhihani

17 Dec 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1450

The Supreme Court held that the respondents failed to establish title and proper identification of the property, invalidated the rectification deed and unproved survey, and restored the trial court's dismissal of the suit for permanent injunction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent injunction property identification rectification deed survey evidence

Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited v. M/s Tecpro Systems Limited

17 Dec 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1447

The Supreme Court held that the referral court must only prima facie satisfy itself about the existence of an arbitration agreement and that detailed jurisdictional issues, including whether an individual consortium member can invoke arbitration, are to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act consortium member capacity to invoke arbitration