Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

29 Apr 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 429
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for filing insolvency petitions under Section 7 of the IBC runs from the date of default and that admission of debt by the Resolution Professional does not extend limitation under the Limitation Act, resulting in dismissal of time-barred petitions.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC Limitation period Section 18 Limitation Act

Reliance Eminent Trading and Commercial Private Limited v. Delhi Development Authority

29 Apr 2026 · J. K. Maheshwari; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2026 INSC 436
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed summary judgment for refund of sale consideration paid for a commercial plot where land acquisition lapsed, holding possession is not a prerequisite for refund and setting aside the registered Conveyance Deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC land acquisition lapse refund of sale consideration

Bonatrans India Pvt. Ltd. v. Bonatrans Employees Union

29 Apr 2026 · Dipankar Datta; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2026 INSC 445

The Supreme Court held that in labour disputes under the MRTU & PULP Act, the burden lies on the union to prove employees are 'workmen' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, and directed framing and deciding this as a preliminary issue before proceeding further.

labor appeal_allowed Significant burden of proof workman Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 MRTU & PULP Act

R. IYYAPPAN v. UNION OF INDIA

29 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 431

The Supreme Court held that the respondents must regularise daily-wage labourers by creating permanent posts as directed by the Tribunal, setting aside a scheme providing only temporary engagement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularisation daily-wage employees permanent posts Central Administrative Tribunal

Lucknow Public School, Eldico and Anr v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

28 Apr 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 422
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory obligation of neighbourhood schools to admit students selected by the State under the RTE Act without delay, reinforcing the constitutional right to free and compulsory education.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Education Neighbourhood School Section 12 RTE Act Admission under RTE

Sadachari Singh Tomar v. Union of India

28 Apr 2026 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 427

The Supreme Court upheld ICAR's lawful curtailment of the appellant's tenure and reversion to a suitable post, holding that Article 311 does not apply and that administrative action was neither arbitrary nor stigmatic.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 311 Constitution curtailment of tenure administrative discretion judicial review

State Bank of India & Ors. v. Doha Bank Q.P.S.C. & Anr.

28 Apr 2026 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Alok Aradhe · 2026 INSC 423
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that corporate guarantees executed by a corporate debtor constitute financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and recognized the appellants as financial creditors, setting aside the concurrent orders of NCLT and NCLAT rejecting their claims.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant corporate guarantee financial debt Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 financial creditor

Sadek Ali @ Md. Sadek Ali and Anr. v. The State of Assam and Anr.

28 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 421

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to procedural lapses, unreliable eyewitnesses, and inept investigation undermining the prosecution's case in a brutal murder trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR delay eyewitness credibility Section 161 Cr.P.C. forensic evidence

FOUNDATION v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 441

The Supreme Court directed final compliance by defaulting States and Union Territories in appointing Nodal Officers for effective implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, endorsed the Union of India's reservation policy for persons with disabilities, and entrusted National Law Universities with monitoring enforcement under judicial oversight.

constitutional other Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Nodal Officers National Law Universities Persons with Benchmark Disabilities

New Delhi Nature Society v. Director Horticulture

27 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2026 INSC 419

The Supreme Court upheld the scientific and lawful translocation of surplus deer from A.N. Jha Deer Park to tiger reserves, directing strict adherence to regulatory and welfare guidelines while permitting limited retention subject to Central Zoo Authority approval.

environmental/wildlife conservation appeal_dismissed Significant wildlife translocation carrying capacity Central Zoo Authority A.N. Jha Deer Park

AMAN SINGH & ANR. v. STATE OF BIHAR

27 Apr 2026 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta; Vijay Bishnoi · 2026 INSC 424
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court stayed the death sentence and issued comprehensive directions to ensure early, structured consideration of mitigating circumstances and effective legal representation in capital punishment cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty mitigating circumstances aggravating circumstances legal representation

Anand Jakkappa Pujari @Gaddadar v. The State of Karnataka

27 Apr 2026 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2026 INSC 417

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and discovery at their instance under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory discovery statement Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

State of Punjab v. Sukhwinder Singh @ Gora

24 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 411
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside High Court bail orders in commercial quantity NDPS cases for failure to record mandatory satisfaction under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), emphasizing that the right to speedy trial cannot override statutory bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37(1)(b)(ii) commercial quantity bail

HOME CARE RETAIL MARTS PVT. LTD. v. HARESH N. SANGHAVI

24 Apr 2026 · Manoj Misra; Manmohan · 2026 INSC 415
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful party, may seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at the post-award stage before enforcement, overruling contrary High Court decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act interim relief post-award unsuccessful party arbitral award enforcement

Sivaramanair v. State of Kerala

24 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 412

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the husband's family members in a dowry harassment and bigamy case due to lack of specific allegations of active involvement, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of legal process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 494 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings

A.P. STATE WAKF BOARD v. JANAKI BUSAPPA

24 Apr 2026 · M.M. Sundresh; Augustine George Masih · 2026 INSC 413
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service inam land attached to a mosque is Wakf property not alienable, and plaintiffs failed to prove valid title or possession, restoring the Tribunal's dismissal of their suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wakf property service inam title and possession burden of proof

Challani Ginning and Pressing Factory v. Kamal

23 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 426

The Supreme Court held that third-party objections claiming joint family property in execution proceedings must be supported by prima facie evidence and cannot be entertained if raised belatedly to stall recovery, setting aside the High Court's order allowing such objection.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance execution proceedings Order XXI CPC third party objection

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LTD. v. SHUBH GAUTAM

23 Apr 2026 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ALOK ARADHE · 2026 INSC 410
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that initiation of insolvency proceedings by a decree holder against a solvent company, bypassing execution remedies, amounts to misuse of the IBC and set aside the admission of the Section 7 petition.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 petition financial creditor financial debt

Adalat Yadav v. State of Bihar

22 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2026 INSC 403
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder and related offences based on the unimpeachable testimony of a single injured eyewitness, emphasizing quality of evidence over quantity and rejecting challenges based on delay in FIR and minor discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole eyewitness testimony sterling witness delay in FIR conflict between medical and ocular evidence

The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu v. S. Raja

22 Apr 2026 · Sanjay Kumar; K. Vinod Chandran · 2026 INSC 407

The Supreme Court upheld the vacating of interim status quo, dismissed premature challenges to the enquiry, emphasized protection of third-party rights, and rejected delayed contempt proceedings in a prolonged land dispute involving Tamil Nadu Government and private parties.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant status quo order land allotment illegal land transactions third-party rights